176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17230160)
21. Human cloning and scientific corruption: the South Korea scandal and the future of the stem cell debate.
New Atlantis; 2006; 11():113-7. PubMed ID: 16789313
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. ORI to study why cheaters cheat.
Ready T
Nat Med; 2000 Sep; 6(9):946. PubMed ID: 10973292
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Ethics: More research won't crack misconduct.
Kornfeld DS; Titus SL
Nature; 2017 Aug; 548(7665):31. PubMed ID: 28770833
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. [More and more researchers are tempted to cheat. Tougher competition concerning resource allocation and career possibilities].
Zetterström R
Lakartidningen; 2003 Mar; 100(11):920-2. PubMed ID: 15148717
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. 'Rehab' helps errant researchers return to the lab.
Cressey D
Nature; 2013 Jan; 493(7431):147. PubMed ID: 23302839
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. When conflicted becomes corrupted II--the Molette doctrine. By Caveman.
J Cell Sci; 2012 Jan; 125(Pt 1):3-5. PubMed ID: 22400129
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Stop ignoring misconduct.
Kornfeld DS; Titus SL
Nature; 2016 Sep; 537(7618):29-30. PubMed ID: 27582206
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Stem-cell brothers divide.
Cyranoski D; Check E
Nature; 2005 Nov; 438(7066):262-3. PubMed ID: 16292267
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The Scientific Misconduct Questionnaire--Revised (SMQ-R): validation and psychometric testing.
Broome ME; Pryor E; Habermann B; Pulley L; Kincaid H
Account Res; 2005; 12(4):263-80. PubMed ID: 16578917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Commentary: Perverse incentives or rotten apples?
Bouter LM
Account Res; 2015; 22(3):148-61. PubMed ID: 25635847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Industry: Shared goals score reproducible results.
Buenz E
Nature; 2016 May; 533(7601):36. PubMed ID: 27147021
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Scientific research and the human condition.
Perez Velazquez JL
Nature; 2003 Jan; 421(6918):13. PubMed ID: 12511929
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Face up to fraud.
Nature; 2012 Jan; 481(7381):237-8. PubMed ID: 22258568
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Misconduct? It's all academic..
Nature; 2007 Jan; 445(7125):240-1. PubMed ID: 17230159
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Quarrel over book leads to call for misconduct inquiry.
Dalton R
Nature; 2004 Oct; 431(7011):889. PubMed ID: 15496886
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Collateral damage: How a case of misconduct brought a leading Japanese biology institute to its knees.
Cyranoski D
Nature; 2015 Apr; 520(7549):600-3. PubMed ID: 25925457
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Chinese law aims to quell fear of failure.
Qiu J
Nature; 2007 Sep; 449(7158):12. PubMed ID: 17805265
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Second chances.
Nature; 2016 Jun; 534(7606):152. PubMed ID: 27279172
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Can't hide your lying eyes.
Wadman M
Nat Med; 2006 May; 12(5):494. PubMed ID: 16675985
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Survey reveals mixed feelings over scientific misconduct.
Abbott A; Graf P
Nature; 2003 Jul; 424(6945):117. PubMed ID: 12853915
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
