BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1723196)

  • 21. Doppler echocardiographic assessment of the hemodynamic benefits of rate adaptive AV delay during exercise in paced patients with complete heart block.
    Sheppard RC; Ren JF; Ross J; McAllister M; Chandrasekaran K; Kutalek SP
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1993 Nov; 16(11):2157-67. PubMed ID: 7505929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Rate adaptive cardiac pacing using right ventricular venous oxygen saturation: quantification of chronotropic behavior during daily activities and maximal exercise.
    Lau CP; Tai YT; Leung WH; Leung SK; Li JP; Wong CK; Lee IS; Yerich C; Erickson M
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1994 Dec; 17(12 Pt 1):2236-46. PubMed ID: 7885930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [An intrapatient comparison of adaptation to aerobic and anaerobic exertion during 3 types of physiological cardiac stimulation in chronotropic failure of the sinus node: DDD, VVIR and DDDR].
    Occhetta E; Perucca A; Fazzari M; Pistis G; Baduini G; Trevi G
    Cardiologia; 1997 Jan; 42(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 9118155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A randomized comparison of atrial and dual-chamber pacing in 177 consecutive patients with sick sinus syndrome: echocardiographic and clinical outcome.
    Nielsen JC; Kristensen L; Andersen HR; Mortensen PT; Pedersen OL; Pedersen AK
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2003 Aug; 42(4):614-23. PubMed ID: 12932590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Usefulness of rate responsive atrial pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome.
    Hatano K; Kato R; Hayashi H; Noda S; Sotobata I; Murase M
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1989 Jan; 12(1 Pt 1):16-24. PubMed ID: 2464806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The A-R interval as exercise indicator: a new option for rate adaptation in single and dual chamber pacing.
    Ruiter JH; de Boer H; Begemann MJ; van Mechelen R
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Dec; 13(12 Pt 1):1656-65. PubMed ID: 1704519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Optimal atrioventricular delay setting determined by evoked QT interval in patients with implanted stimulus-T-driven DDDR pacemakers.
    Ishikawa T; Sugano T; Sumita S; Nakagawa T; Hanada K; Kosuge M; Kobayashi I; Kimura K; Tochikubo O; Usui T; Umemura S
    Europace; 2001 Jan; 3(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 11271951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Programming a long paced atrioventricular interval may be risky in DDDR pacing.
    Pieterse MG; den Dulk K; van Gelder BM; van Mechelen R; Wellens HJ
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1994 Feb; 17(2):252-7. PubMed ID: 7513413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Respiratory-dependent atrial pacing, management of sinus node disease.
    Rognoni G; Bolognese L; Aina F; Occhetta E; Magnani A; Rossi P
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1988 Nov; 11(11 Pt 2):1853-9. PubMed ID: 2463558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A comparison of single-lead atrial pacing with dual-chamber pacing in sick sinus syndrome.
    Nielsen JC; Thomsen PE; Højberg S; Møller M; Vesterlund T; Dalsgaard D; Mortensen LS; Nielsen T; Asklund M; Friis EV; Christensen PD; Simonsen EH; Eriksen UH; Jensen GV; Svendsen JH; Toff WD; Healey JS; Andersen HR;
    Eur Heart J; 2011 Mar; 32(6):686-96. PubMed ID: 21300730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Long-term survival of chosen atrial-based pacing modalities.
    Irwin M; Carbol B; Senaratne M; Gulamhusein S
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Nov; 19(11 Pt 2):1796-8. PubMed ID: 8945043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Chronotropic competence in patients with the sick sinus syndrome wearing AAI or DDD pacemakers].
    Goicolea de Oro A; Márquez L; López Gil M; Kallmeyer C; Chicote R; García-Cosío F
    Rev Esp Cardiol; 1993 Jun; 46(6):335-9. PubMed ID: 8316699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Importance of heart rate response during exercise in patients using atrioventricular synchronous and ventricular pacemakers.
    McMeekin JD; Lautner D; Hanson S; Gulamhusein SS
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Jan; 13(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 1689036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Incidence of atrial fibrillation and thromboembolism in a randomised trial of atrial versus dual chamber pacing in 177 patients with sick sinus syndrome.
    Kristensen L; Nielsen JC; Mortensen PT; Pedersen OL; Pedersen AK; Andersen HR
    Heart; 2004 Jun; 90(6):661-6. PubMed ID: 15145874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A double-blind study of submaximal exercise tolerance and variation in paced rate in atrial synchronous compared to activity sensor modulated ventricular pacing.
    Linde-Edelstam C; Nordlander R; Pehrsson SK; Rydén L
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Jun; 15(6):905-15. PubMed ID: 1376903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Relationship between heart rate and oxygen kinetics during constant workload exercise.
    Kay GN; Ashar MS; Bubien RS; Dailey SM
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Oct; 18(10):1853-60. PubMed ID: 8539152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cardiac output is a sensitive indicator of difference in exercise performance between single and dual sensor pacemakers.
    Leung SK; Lau CP; Tang MO
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Jan; 21(1 Pt 1):35-41. PubMed ID: 9474646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effects of rate-adaptive atrial pacing versus ventricular backup pacing on exercise capacity in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.
    Passman R; Banthia S; Galvez D; Sheldon T; Kadish A
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2009 Jan; 32(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 19140906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Influence of the pacing rate on the atrioventricular conduction time during aerobic and anaerobic exercise: basic concepts for a dromotropically controlled rate responsive pacemaker.
    Meine M; Hexamer M; Werner J; Israel CW; Mügge A; Lemke B; Barmeyer J
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Dec; 22(12):1782-91. PubMed ID: 10642132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Heart rate variability in patients suffering from structural heart disease and decreased AV-nodal conduction capacity. Insights into the formation of heart rate variability.
    Schwab JO; Eichner G; Schmitt H; Schrickel J; Yang A; Balta O; Lüderitz B; Lewalter T
    Z Kardiol; 2004 Mar; 93(3):229-33. PubMed ID: 15024591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.