BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17233564)

  • 21. [Comparison of statistical methods for detecting differential expression in microarray data].
    Shan WJ; Tong CF; Shi JS
    Yi Chuan; 2008 Dec; 30(12):1640-6. PubMed ID: 19073583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparative analysis of algorithms for signal quantitation from oligonucleotide microarrays.
    Barash Y; Dehan E; Krupsky M; Franklin W; Geraci M; Friedman N; Kaminski N
    Bioinformatics; 2004 Apr; 20(6):839-46. PubMed ID: 14751998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Normalization and quantification of differential expression in gene expression microarrays.
    Steinhoff C; Vingron M
    Brief Bioinform; 2006 Jun; 7(2):166-77. PubMed ID: 16772260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of algorithms for the analysis of Affymetrix microarray data as evaluated by co-expression of genes in known operons.
    Harr B; Schlötterer C
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2006 Jan; 34(2):e8. PubMed ID: 16432259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An improved nonparametric approach for detecting differentially expressed genes with replicated microarray data.
    Zhang S
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2006; 5():Article30. PubMed ID: 17402914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of small n statistical tests of differential expression applied to microarrays.
    Murie C; Woody O; Lee AY; Nadon R
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Feb; 10():45. PubMed ID: 19192265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparative analysis of microarray normalization procedures: effects on reverse engineering gene networks.
    Lim WK; Wang K; Lefebvre C; Califano A
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Jul; 23(13):i282-8. PubMed ID: 17646307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. On the identification of differentially expressed genes: improving the generalized F-statistics for Affymetrix microarray gene expression data.
    Lai Y
    Comput Biol Chem; 2006 Oct; 30(5):321-6. PubMed ID: 16979381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Quality control of Platinum Spike dataset by probe-level mixed models.
    Khamiakova T; Shkedy Z; Amaratunga D; Talloen W; Göhlmann H; Bijnens L; Kasim A
    Math Biosci; 2014 Feb; 248():1-10. PubMed ID: 24300569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Systematic order-dependent effect in expression values, variance, detection calls and differential expression in Affymetrix GeneChips.
    Bjork KE; Kafadar K
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Nov; 23(21):2873-80. PubMed ID: 17897972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Robust detection and genotyping of single feature polymorphisms from gene expression data.
    Wang M; Hu X; Li G; Leach LJ; Potokina E; Druka A; Waugh R; Kearsey MJ; Luo Z
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2009 Mar; 5(3):e1000317. PubMed ID: 19282978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. MOST: detecting cancer differential gene expression.
    Lian H
    Biostatistics; 2008 Jul; 9(3):411-8. PubMed ID: 18048648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Work efficiency: a new criterion for comprehensive comparison and evaluation of statistical methods in large-scale identification of differentially expressed genes.
    Tan YD
    Genomics; 2011 Nov; 98(5):390-9. PubMed ID: 21741470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Unbiased characterization of high-density oligonucleotide microarrays using probe-level statistics.
    Aimone JB; Gage FH
    J Neurosci Methods; 2004 May; 135(1-2):27-33. PubMed ID: 15020086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Detecting differential gene expression with a semiparametric hierarchical mixture method.
    Newton MA; Noueiry A; Sarkar D; Ahlquist P
    Biostatistics; 2004 Apr; 5(2):155-76. PubMed ID: 15054023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Arrow plot: a new graphical tool for selecting up and down regulated genes and genes differentially expressed on sample subgroups.
    Silva-Fortes C; Amaral Turkman MA; Sousa L
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Jun; 13():147. PubMed ID: 22734592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Large scale real-time PCR validation on gene expression measurements from two commercial long-oligonucleotide microarrays.
    Wang Y; Barbacioru C; Hyland F; Xiao W; Hunkapiller KL; Blake J; Chan F; Gonzalez C; Zhang L; Samaha RR
    BMC Genomics; 2006 Mar; 7():59. PubMed ID: 16551369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Improving identification of differentially expressed genes in microarray studies using information from public databases.
    Kim RD; Park PJ
    Genome Biol; 2004; 5(9):R70. PubMed ID: 15345054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Putative null distributions corresponding to tests of differential expression in the Golden Spike dataset are intensity dependent.
    Gaile DP; Miecznikowski JC
    BMC Genomics; 2007 Apr; 8():105. PubMed ID: 17445265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An investigation on performance of Significance Analysis of Microarray (SAM) for the comparisons of several treatments with one control in the presence of small-variance genes.
    Lin D; Shkedy Z; Burzykowski T; Ion R; Göhlmann HW; Bondt AD; Perer T; Geerts T; Van den Wyngaert I; Bijnens L
    Biom J; 2008 Oct; 50(5):801-23. PubMed ID: 18932139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.