BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17233564)

  • 41. Robust Significance Analysis of Microarrays by Minimum
    Shahjaman M; Kumar N; Mollah MMH; Ahmed MS; Ara Begum A; Shahinul Islam SM; Mollah MNH
    Biomed Res Int; 2017; 2017():5310198. PubMed ID: 28819626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A Distribution-Free Convolution Model for background correction of oligonucleotide microarray data.
    Chen Z; McGee M; Liu Q; Kong M; Deng Y; Scheuermann RH
    BMC Genomics; 2009 Jul; 10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S19. PubMed ID: 19594878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Optimizing microarray in experimental hypertension.
    Shannon MF; McKenzie KU; Edgley A; Rao S; Peng K; Shweta A; Schyvens CG; Anderson WP; Wilson SR; Pittelkow YE; Ohms S; Whitworth JA
    Kidney Int; 2005 Jan; 67(1):364-70. PubMed ID: 15610263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Reproducibility-optimized test statistic for ranking genes in microarray studies.
    Elo LL; Filen S; Lahesmaa R; Aittokallio T
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2008; 5(3):423-431. PubMed ID: 18670045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Computational method for reducing variance with Affymetrix microarrays.
    Welle S; Brooks AI; Thornton CA
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2002 Aug; 3():23. PubMed ID: 12204100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Determining gene expression on a single pair of microarrays.
    Reid RW; Fodor AA
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Nov; 9():489. PubMed ID: 19025600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Estimation and correction of non-specific binding in a large-scale spike-in experiment.
    Schuster EF; Blanc E; Partridge L; Thornton JM
    Genome Biol; 2007; 8(6):R126. PubMed ID: 17594493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Background correction using dinucleotide affinities improves the performance of GCRMA.
    Gharaibeh RZ; Fodor AA; Gibas CJ
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Oct; 9():452. PubMed ID: 18947404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. On the necessity of different statistical treatment for Illumina BeadChip and Affymetrix GeneChip data and its significance for biological interpretation.
    Wong WC; Loh M; Eisenhaber F
    Biol Direct; 2008 Jun; 3():23. PubMed ID: 18522715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. A cautionary note on the rank product statistic.
    Koziol JA
    FEBS Lett; 2016 Jun; 590(11):1586-91. PubMed ID: 27160968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Empirical comparison of tests for differential expression on simulated time series microarray experiments.
    Fischer EA; Friedman M; Markey MK
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2006; 2006():921. PubMed ID: 17238540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Wavelet-based detection of transcriptional activity on a novel Staphylococcus aureus tiling microarray.
    Segura V; Toledo-Arana A; Uzqueda M; Lasa I; Muñoz-Barrutia A
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Sep; 13():222. PubMed ID: 22950634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Effect of sample size and P-value filtering techniques on the detection of transcriptional changes induced in rat neuroblastoma (NG108) cells by mefloquine.
    Dow GS
    Malar J; 2003 Feb; 2():4. PubMed ID: 12675948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A Bayesian calibration model for combining different pre-processing methods in Affymetrix chips.
    Blangiardo M; Richardson S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Dec; 9():512. PubMed ID: 19046434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Improving identification of differentially expressed genes by integrative analysis of Affymetrix and Illumina arrays.
    Elo LL; Katajamaa M; Lund R; Oresic M; Lahesmaa R; Aittokallio T
    OMICS; 2006; 10(3):369-80. PubMed ID: 17069514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Fisher's combined p-value for detecting differentially expressed genes using Affymetrix expression arrays.
    Hess A; Iyer H
    BMC Genomics; 2007 Apr; 8():96. PubMed ID: 17419876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Preferred analysis methods for Affymetrix GeneChips. II. An expanded, balanced, wholly-defined spike-in dataset.
    Zhu Q; Miecznikowski JC; Halfon MS
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 May; 11():285. PubMed ID: 20507584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Two-way AIC: detection of differentially expressed genes from large scale microarray meta-dataset.
    Tsuyuzaki K; Tominaga D; Kwon Y; Miyazaki S
    BMC Genomics; 2013; 14 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S9. PubMed ID: 23445621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Should we abandon the t-test in the analysis of gene expression microarray data: a comparison of variance modeling strategies.
    Jeanmougin M; de Reynies A; Marisa L; Paccard C; Nuel G; Guedj M
    PLoS One; 2010 Sep; 5(9):e12336. PubMed ID: 20838429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Statistical evaluation of differential expression on cDNA nylon arrays with replicated experiments.
    Herwig R; Aanstad P; Clark M; Lehrach H
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2001 Dec; 29(23):E117. PubMed ID: 11726700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.