These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17234012)

  • 21. Gender equality in the work of local research ethics committees in Europe: a study of practice in five countries.
    Moerman CJ; Haafkens JA; Söderström M; Rásky E; Maguire P; Maschewsky-Schneider U; Norstedt M; Hahn D; Reinerth H; McKevitt N
    J Med Ethics; 2007 Feb; 33(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 17264199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Challenges and proposed solutions in making clinical research on COVID-19 ethical: a status quo analysis across German research ethics committees.
    Faust A; Sierawska A; Krüger K; Wisgalla A; Hasford J; Strech D
    BMC Med Ethics; 2021 Jul; 22(1):96. PubMed ID: 34281535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Monitoring of health research by ethics committees.
    Douglass AJ; Jarvis A; Bloore S
    N Z Med J; 1998 Mar; 111(1061):79-81. PubMed ID: 9549558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Inconsistency and institutional review boards.
    Goldman J; Katz MD
    JAMA; 1982 Jul; 248(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 7045428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Multicentre trials review process by research ethics committees in Spain: where do they stand before implementing the new European regulation?
    Dal-Ré R; Ortega R; Morejón E
    J Med Ethics; 2005 Jun; 31(6):344-50. PubMed ID: 15923484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Acceptability of donor funding for clinical trials in the UK: a qualitative empirical ethics study using focus groups to elicit the views of research patient public involvement group members, research ethics committee chairs and clinical researchers.
    Shearman K; Masters A; Nutt D; Bowman S; Draper H
    BMJ Open; 2022 Jun; 12(6):e055208. PubMed ID: 35715186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Do research ethics committees identify process errors in applications for ethical approval?
    Angell E; Dixon-Woods M
    J Med Ethics; 2009 Feb; 35(2):130-2. PubMed ID: 19181888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Can we do better? Researchers' experiences with ethical review boards on projects with later life as a focus.
    Pachana NA; Liddle J; Peel NM; Beattie E; Juang C; Knight BG
    J Alzheimers Dis; 2015; 43(3):701-7. PubMed ID: 25374104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Ethics committees and achievement of good clinical practice.
    Glasa J; Holomán J; Klepanec J; Soltés L
    Therapie; 1996; 51(4):369-72. PubMed ID: 8953810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Doing accountability: a discourse analysis of research ethics committee letters.
    O'Reilly M; Dixon-Woods M; Angell E; Ashcroft R; Bryman A
    Sociol Health Illn; 2009 Mar; 31(2):246-61. PubMed ID: 18983419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Public involvement could usefully inform ethical review, but rarely does: what are the implications?
    Staley K; Elliott J
    Res Involv Engagem; 2017; 3():30. PubMed ID: 29238613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of Research Ethics Committees: Criteria for the Ethical Quality of the Review Process.
    Scherzinger G; Bobbert M
    Account Res; 2017; 24(3):152-176. PubMed ID: 28005408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The role of research ethics committees after the approval of clinical trial protocols in the EU and the USA: a descriptive content analysis of international and regional normative documents.
    Cox S; Solbakk JH; Bernabe RDLC
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2021 Jun; 37(6):1061-1069. PubMed ID: 33734933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. What is the role of the research ethics committee? Paternalism, inducements, and harm in research ethics.
    Garrard E; Dawson A
    J Med Ethics; 2005 Jul; 31(7):419-23. PubMed ID: 15994364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Payment of research participants: current practice and policies of Irish research ethics committees.
    Roche E; King R; Mohan HM; Gavin B; McNicholas F
    J Med Ethics; 2013 Sep; 39(9):591-3. PubMed ID: 23204324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Health researchers' views of ethics committee functioning in New Zealand.
    Paul C
    N Z Med J; 2000 Jun; 113(1111):210-4. PubMed ID: 10909934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [What does the Danish population know about the scientific ethics committees?].
    Holm S; Rossel P
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1996 Jul; 158(31):4383-4. PubMed ID: 8759993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Biomedical Research Ethics Committees in sub-Saharan Africa: a collective review of their structure, functioning, and outcomes.
    Silaigwana B; Wassenaar D
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2015 Apr; 10(2):169-84. PubMed ID: 25819759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Ethical review procedures in international internet-based intervention studies.
    Looijmans A; Spahrkäs SS; Sanderman R; Hagedoorn M
    Internet Interv; 2022 Apr; 28():100487. PubMed ID: 35646602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A study of warning letters issued to institutional review boards by the United States Food and Drug Administration.
    Bramstedt KA; Kassimatis K
    Clin Invest Med; 2004 Dec; 27(6):316-23. PubMed ID: 15675112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.