These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17234027)

  • 1. Benefits of and barriers to involving users in medical device technology development and evaluation.
    Shah SG; Robinson I
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2007; 23(1):131-7. PubMed ID: 17234027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. User involvement in healthcare technology development and assessment: structured literature review.
    Shah SG; Robinson I
    Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv; 2006; 19(6-7):500-15. PubMed ID: 17100220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Developing medical device technologies from users' perspectives: a theoretical framework for involving users in the development process.
    Shah SG; Robinson I; AlShawi S
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Oct; 25(4):514-21. PubMed ID: 19845981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of the user within the medical device design and development process: medical device manufacturers' perspectives.
    Money AG; Barnett J; Kuljis J; Craven MP; Martin JL; Young T
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2011 Feb; 11():15. PubMed ID: 21356097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Developing more desirable products for stroke survivors.
    Stehle C; Albrecht-Buehler C
    Top Stroke Rehabil; 2008; 15(2):109-17. PubMed ID: 18430675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Design and implementation of a portal for the medical equipment market: MEDICOM.
    Palamas S; Kalivas D; Panou-Diamandi O; Zeelenberg C; van Nimwegen C
    J Med Internet Res; 2001; 3(4):E32. PubMed ID: 11772547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The user testing toolset: a decision support system to aid the evaluation of assistive technology products.
    Woodcock A; Fielden S; Bartlett R
    Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():1381-6. PubMed ID: 22316911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A user-centred approach to requirements elicitation in medical device development: a case study from an industry perspective.
    Martin JL; Clark DJ; Morgan SP; Crowe JA; Murphy E
    Appl Ergon; 2012 Jan; 43(1):184-90. PubMed ID: 21636072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Telemedicine for the Medicare population: pediatric, obstetric, and clinician-indirect home interventions.
    Hersh WR; Wallace JA; Patterson PK; Shapiro SE; Kraemer DF; Eilers GM; Chan BK; Greenlick MR; Helfand M
    Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ); 2001 Aug; (24 Suppl):1-32. PubMed ID: 11569328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. User-centred health design: reflections on D4D's experiences and challenges.
    Moody L
    J Med Eng Technol; 2014; 39(7):395-403. PubMed ID: 26453037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Converging, pervasive technologies: chronic and emerging issues and policy adequacy.
    Seelman KD
    Assist Technol; 2008; 20(3):126-37; quiz 138. PubMed ID: 18939653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using the ICF in economic analyses of Assistive Technology systems: methodological implications of a user standpoint.
    Schraner I; De Jonge D; Layton N; Bringolf J; Molenda A
    Disabil Rehabil; 2008; 30(12-13):916-26. PubMed ID: 18484387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A framework for the conceptual modelling of assistive technology device outcomes.
    Fuhrer MJ; Jutai JW; Scherer MJ; DeRuyter F
    Disabil Rehabil; 2003 Nov; 25(22):1243-51. PubMed ID: 14617441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Issues and challenges of involving users in medical device development.
    Bridgelal Ram M; Grocott PR; Weir HC
    Health Expect; 2008 Mar; 11(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 18275403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0): the development of the Taiwanese version.
    Mao HF; Chen WY; Yao G; Huang SL; Lin CC; Huang WN
    Clin Rehabil; 2010 May; 24(5):412-21. PubMed ID: 20442253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Integrating the results of user research into medical device development: insights from a case study.
    Martin JL; Barnett J
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2012 Jul; 12():74. PubMed ID: 22812565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Toward the development of consumer-based criteria for the evaluation of assistive devices.
    Batavia AI; Hammer GS
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1990; 27(4):425-36. PubMed ID: 2089152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Enhancing public involvement in assistive technology design research.
    Williamson T; Kenney L; Barker AT; Cooper G; Good T; Healey J; Heller B; Howard D; Matthews M; Prenton S; Ryan J; Smith C
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2015 May; 10(3):258-65. PubMed ID: 24738715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. User-centered methods for designing patient-centric self-help tools.
    Arsand E; Demiris G
    Inform Health Soc Care; 2008 Sep; 33(3):158-69. PubMed ID: 18850399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Health technology assessment of medical devices: What is different? An overview of three European projects.
    Schnell-Inderst P; Mayer J; Lauterberg J; Hunger T; Arvandi M; Conrads-Frank A; Nachtnebel A; Wild C; Siebert U
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2015; 109(4-5):309-18. PubMed ID: 26354131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.