390 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17234921)
1. Stem cell debate. Scientists protest 'misrepresentation' as Senate vote looms.
Holden C
Science; 2007 Jan; 315(5810):315-6. PubMed ID: 17234921
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomedical research. A first step in relaxing restrictions on stem cell research.
Holden C
Science; 2009 Mar; 323(5920):1412-3. PubMed ID: 19286523
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Research ethics. The NIH draft guidelines on human stem cell research.
Majumder MA; Cohen CB
Science; 2009 Jun; 324(5935):1648-9. PubMed ID: 19556488
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Stem cells. Ethics questions add to concerns about NIH lines.
Vogel G; Holden C
Science; 2008 Aug; 321(5890):756-7. PubMed ID: 18687929
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Audio interview: expanding federal funding for embryonic stem-cell research. Interview by Rachel Gotbaum.
Hatch OG
N Engl J Med; 2007 May; 356(18):e18. PubMed ID: 17452439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Who said murder?
New Sci; 2006 Jul 29-Aug 4; 191(2562):3. PubMed ID: 17115485
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The moral, ethical, and legal controversy surrounding pluripotent stem cell research.
Doody K
Loyola Law Rev; 2002; 48(2):267-326. PubMed ID: 15156885
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Obama executive order. For Congress and NIH, headaches ahead on stem cells.
Holden C
Science; 2009 Mar; 323(5921):1552-3. PubMed ID: 19299595
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The once and future debate on human embryonic stem cell research.
Latham SR
Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2009; 9 Suppl():483-94. PubMed ID: 19757716
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Stem cell research. Senate prepares to vote at last on a trio of stem cell bills.
Holden C
Science; 2006 Jul; 313(5783):26-7. PubMed ID: 16825539
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Stem cells. Deriving 'controversy-free' ES cells is controversial.
Vogel G
Science; 2005 Oct; 310(5747):416-7. PubMed ID: 16239442
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Obama transition. A fresh start for embryonic stem cells.
Holden C
Science; 2008 Dec; 322(5908):1619. PubMed ID: 19074316
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Resurrection of a stem-cell funding barrier--Dickey-Wicker in court.
Annas GJ
N Engl J Med; 2010 Oct; 363(18):1687-9. PubMed ID: 20979467
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. House challenges Bush's limits on embryonic-stem-cell research.
Brainard J
Chron High Educ; 2005 Jun; 51(39):A17. PubMed ID: 16018100
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Cell biology. A seismic shift for stem cell research.
Holden C; Vogel G
Science; 2008 Feb; 319(5863):560-3. PubMed ID: 18239100
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Embryonic stem cell research controversy: focus on the private sector and international sphere.
Kim S
Hastings Womens Law J; 2003; 14(1):89-108. PubMed ID: 16032810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Perspectives on human stem cell research.
Jung KW
J Cell Physiol; 2009 Sep; 220(3):535-7. PubMed ID: 19384875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bush vetoes bill to loosen policy on stem-cell research.
Kean S
Chron High Educ; 2006 Jul; 52(47):A17. PubMed ID: 17115488
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomedical policy. Draft stem cell guidelines please many, disappoint some.
Holden C; Kaiser J
Science; 2009 Apr; 324(5926):446. PubMed ID: 19390007
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Stem cell research debate shifting to the courts.
Vick KR
J Biolaw Bus; 2006; 9(1):56-7. PubMed ID: 17111530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
