These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17235702)

  • 1. The validity of phallometric assessment with rapists: comments on Looman & Marshall (2005).
    Lalumière ML; Rice ME
    Sex Abuse; 2007 Mar; 19(1):61-8; Discussion 69-72. PubMed ID: 17235702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sexual preference for child and aggressive stimuli: comparison of rapists and child molesters using auditory and visual stimuli.
    Miner MH; West MA; Day DM
    Behav Res Ther; 1995 Jun; 33(5):545-51. PubMed ID: 7598675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rapists and child molesters: psychometric comparisons.
    Hillbrand M; Foster H; Hirt M
    Arch Sex Behav; 1990 Feb; 19(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 2327896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sexual arousal in rapists as measured by two stimulus sets.
    Looman J
    Sex Abuse; 2000 Oct; 12(4):235-48. PubMed ID: 11027109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validity of physiological measures of pedophilic sexual arousal in a sexual offender population: a critique of Hall, Proctor, and Nelson.
    Quinsey VL; Laws DR
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 1990 Dec; 58(6):886-91. PubMed ID: 2292642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cognitive schemas and sexual offending: differences between rapists, pedophilic and nonpedophilic child molesters, and nonsexual offenders.
    Sigre-Leirós V; Carvalho J; Nobre P
    Child Abuse Negl; 2015 Feb; 40():81-92. PubMed ID: 25455215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validity in Phallometric Testing for Sexual Interests in Children: A Meta-Analytic Review.
    McPhail IV; Hermann CA; Fernane S; Fernandez YM; Nunes KL; Cantor JM
    Assessment; 2019 Apr; 26(3):535-551. PubMed ID: 28454493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sexual arousal to female children in gynephilic men.
    Lykins AD; Cantor JM; Kuban ME; Blak T; Dickey R; Klassen PE; Blanchard R
    Sex Abuse; 2010 Sep; 22(3):279-89. PubMed ID: 20562410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Phallometric comparison of pedophilic interest in nonadmitting sexual offenders against stepdaughters, biological daughters, other biologically related girls, and unrelated girls.
    Blanchard R; Kuban ME; Blak T; Cantor JM; Klassen P; Dickey R
    Sex Abuse; 2006 Jan; 18(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 16598663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inhibiting Sexual Arousal to Children: Correlates and Its Influence on the Validity of Penile Plethysmography.
    Babchishin KM; Curry SD; Fedoroff JP; Bradford J; Seto MC
    Arch Sex Behav; 2017 Apr; 46(3):671-684. PubMed ID: 28265778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Are rapists differentially aroused by coercive sex in phallometric assessments?
    Lalumière ML; Quinsey VL; Harris GT; Rice ME; Trautrimas C
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2003 Jun; 989():211-24; discussion 236-46. PubMed ID: 12839900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The relationship of deviant sexual arousal and psychopathy in incest offenders, extrafamilial child molesters, and rapists.
    Firestone P; Bradford JM; Greenberg DM; Serran GA
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2000; 28(3):303-8. PubMed ID: 11055527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sexualization and lifestyle impulsivity: clinically valid discriminators in sexual offenders.
    Eher R; Neuwirth W; Fruehwald S; Frottier P
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2003 Aug; 47(4):452-67. PubMed ID: 12971185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differentiation of homicidal child molesters, nonhomicidal child molesters, and nonoffenders by phallometry.
    Firestone P; Bradford JM; Greenberg DM; Nunes KL
    Am J Psychiatry; 2000 Nov; 157(11):1847-50. PubMed ID: 11058484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Identifying schemas in child molesters, rapists, and violent offenders.
    Milner RJ; Webster SD
    Sex Abuse; 2005 Oct; 17(4):425-39. PubMed ID: 16341603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measurement of risk of sexual violence through phallometric testing.
    Howes RJ
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2009 Apr; 11 Suppl 1():S368-9. PubMed ID: 19362036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Penile responses of rapists and nonrapists to rape stimuli involving physical violence or humiliation.
    Proulx J; Aubut J; McKibben A; Côté M
    Arch Sex Behav; 1994 Jun; 23(3):295-310. PubMed ID: 8024442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of modified versions of the Static-99 and the Sex Offender Risk Appraisal Guide.
    Nunes KL; Firestone P; Bradford JM; Greenberg DM; Broom I
    Sex Abuse; 2002 Jul; 14(3):253-69. PubMed ID: 12087686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validity of phallometric measures with sex offenders: comments on the Quinsey, Laws, and Hall debate.
    Schouten PG; Simon WT
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 1992 Oct; 60(5):812-4. PubMed ID: 1401400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sensitivity and Specificity of the Phallometric Test for Hebephilia.
    Cantor JM; McPhail IV
    J Sex Med; 2015 Sep; 12(9):1940-50. PubMed ID: 26272778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.