146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17236126)
1. Magnification endoscopy for diagnosis of nonerosive reflux disease: a proposal of diagnostic criteria and critical analysis of observer variability.
Edebo A; Tam W; Bruno M; Van Berkel AM; Jönson C; Schoeman M; Tytgat G; Dent J; Lundell L
Endoscopy; 2007 Mar; 39(3):195-201. PubMed ID: 17236126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Potential contribution of novel imaging modalities in non-erosive reflux disease.
Gossner L
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol; 2008; 22(4):617-24. PubMed ID: 18656820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Inter- and intra-observer variability of magnification chromoendoscopy for detecting specialized intestinal metaplasia at the gastroesophageal junction.
Meining A; Rösch T; Kiesslich R; Muders M; Sax F; Heldwein W
Endoscopy; 2004 Feb; 36(2):160-4. PubMed ID: 14765313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Esophageal capsule endoscopy in patients with suspected esophageal disease: double blinded comparison with esophagogastroduodenoscopy and assessment of interobserver variability.
Delvaux M; Papanikolaou IS; Fassler I; Pohl H; Voderholzer W; Rösch T; Gay G
Endoscopy; 2008 Jan; 40(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 18058656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interobserver agreement on classifying endoscopic diagnoses of nonerosive esophagitis.
Amano Y; Ishimura N; Furuta K; Okita K; Masaharu M; Azumi T; Ose T; Koshino K; Ishihara S; Adachi K; Kinoshita Y
Endoscopy; 2006 Oct; 38(10):1032-5. PubMed ID: 17058170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A feasibility trial of narrow band imaging endoscopy in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Sharma P; Wani S; Bansal A; Hall S; Puli S; Mathur S; Rastogi A
Gastroenterology; 2007 Aug; 133(2):454-64; quiz 674. PubMed ID: 17681166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Correlation among standard endoscopy, narrow band imaging, and histopathological findings in the diagnosis of nonerosive reflux disease.
Kasap E; Zeybel M; Aşık G; Ayhan S; Yüceyar H
J Gastrointestin Liver Dis; 2011 Jun; 20(2):127-30. PubMed ID: 21725507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The utility of narrow band imaging in improving the endoscopic diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Fock KM; Teo EK; Ang TL; Tan JY; Law NM
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2009 Jan; 7(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 18852068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is conventional endoscopic identification of non-erosive reflux disease adequate?
Falk GW
Digestion; 2008; 78 Suppl 1():17-23. PubMed ID: 18832836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Microscopic esophageal mucosal injury in nonerosive reflux disease.
Dent J
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2007 Jan; 5(1):4-16. PubMed ID: 17157563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The added value of magnifying endoscopy in diagnosing patients with certain gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Wasielica-Berger J; Kemona A; Kiśluk J; Świdnicka-Siergiejko A; Rogalski P; Chwieśko A; Kostrzewska M; Dąbrowski A
Adv Med Sci; 2018 Sep; 63(2):359-366. PubMed ID: 30114679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of laryngeal examination during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for premalignancy screening: prospective study in patients with and without reflux symptoms.
Cammarota G; Galli J; Agostino S; De Corso E; Rigante M; Cianci R; Cesaro P; Nista EC; Candelli M; Gasbarrini A; Gasbarrini G
Endoscopy; 2006 Apr; 38(4):376-81. PubMed ID: 16680637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mucosal morphology in Barrett's esophagus: interobserver agreement and role of narrow band imaging.
Curvers WL; Bohmer CJ; Mallant-Hent RC; Naber AH; Ponsioen CI; Ragunath K; Singh R; Wallace MB; Wolfsen HC; Song LM; Lindeboom R; Fockens P; Bergman JJ
Endoscopy; 2008 Oct; 40(10):799-805. PubMed ID: 18828075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bowel symptoms in nonerosive gastroesophageal reflux disease: nature, prevalence, and relation to acid reflux.
Zimmerman J; Hershcovici T
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2008 Mar; 42(3):261-5. PubMed ID: 18223499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Circumferential and axial distribution of esophageal mucosal damage in reflux disease.
Edebo A; Vieth M; Tam W; Bruno M; van Berkel AM; Stolte M; Schoeman M; Tytgat G; Dent J; Lundell L
Dis Esophagus; 2007; 20(3):232-8. PubMed ID: 17509120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Catheter-free pH-metry using the Bravo capsule versus standard pH-metry in patients with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD)].
Mönkemüller K; Neumann H; Fry LC; Kolfenbach S; Malfertheiner P
Z Gastroenterol; 2009 Apr; 47(4):351-6. PubMed ID: 19358061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Nonerosive reflux disease.
Long JD; Orlando RC
Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol; 2007 Jun; 53(2):127-41. PubMed ID: 17557041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. High prevalence of reflux oesophagitis among upper endoscopies of Iranian patients.
Rezailashkajani M; Roshandel D; Shafaee S; Zali MR
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2007 Jun; 19(6):499-506. PubMed ID: 17489061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Chromoendoscopy and narrow-band imaging compared with high-resolution magnification endoscopy in Barrett's esophagus.
Curvers W; Baak L; Kiesslich R; Van Oijen A; Rabenstein T; Ragunath K; Rey JF; Scholten P; Seitz U; Ten Kate F; Fockens P; Bergman J
Gastroenterology; 2008 Mar; 134(3):670-9. PubMed ID: 18242603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Increased esophageal mucosal/submucosal blood flow in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: normalization by treatment with a proton pump inhibitor.
Mine S; Iida T; Tabata T; Okada Y; Tanaka Y
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Feb; 23(2):303-9. PubMed ID: 17725600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
