These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

374 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17236413)

  • 1. The conditions for speciation through intraspecific competition.
    Bürger R; Schneider KA; Willensdorfer M
    Evolution; 2006 Nov; 60(11):2185-206. PubMed ID: 17236413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intraspecific competitive divergence and convergence under assortative mating.
    Bürger R; Schneider KA
    Am Nat; 2006 Feb; 167(2):190-205. PubMed ID: 16670980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does competitive divergence occur if assortative mating is costly?
    Schneider KA; Bürger R
    J Evol Biol; 2006 Mar; 19(2):570-88. PubMed ID: 16599933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adaptive speciation when assortative mating is based on female preference for male marker traits.
    Doebeli M
    J Evol Biol; 2005 Nov; 18(6):1587-600. PubMed ID: 16313470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An analytically tractable model for competitive speciation.
    Pennings PS; Kopp M; Meszéna G; Dieckmann U; Hermisson J
    Am Nat; 2008 Jan; 171(1):E44-71. PubMed ID: 18171142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Additive genetic variation under intraspecific competition and stabilizing selection: a two-locus study.
    Bürger R
    Theor Popul Biol; 2002 Mar; 61(2):197-213. PubMed ID: 11969390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The evolution of genetic architecture under frequency-dependent disruptive selection.
    Kopp M; Hermisson J
    Evolution; 2006 Aug; 60(8):1537-50. PubMed ID: 17017055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Competitive divergence in non-random mating populations.
    Schneider KA
    Theor Popul Biol; 2005 Aug; 68(2):105-18. PubMed ID: 15967471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-term evolution of polygenic traits under frequency-dependent intraspecific competition.
    Schneider KA
    Theor Popul Biol; 2007 May; 71(3):342-66. PubMed ID: 17275867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A model for the evolution of assortative mating.
    de Cara MA; Barton NH; Kirkpatrick M
    Am Nat; 2008 May; 171(5):580-96. PubMed ID: 18419568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The shape of the competition and carrying capacity kernels affects the likelihood of disruptive selection.
    Baptestini EM; de Aguiar MA; Bolnick DI; Araújo MS
    J Theor Biol; 2009 Jul; 259(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 19285511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On a genetic model of intraspecific competition and stabilizing selection.
    Bürger R
    Am Nat; 2002 Nov; 160(5):661-82. PubMed ID: 18707515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speciation through competition: a critical review.
    Polechová J; Barton NH
    Evolution; 2005 Jun; 59(6):1194-210. PubMed ID: 16050097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evolution of dominance under frequency-dependent intraspecific competition in an assortatively mating population.
    Peischl S; Schneider KA
    Evolution; 2010 Feb; 64(2):561-82. PubMed ID: 19780814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How do natural and sexual selection contribute to sympatric speciation?
    Gourbiere S
    J Evol Biol; 2004 Nov; 17(6):1297-309. PubMed ID: 15525414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can intraspecific competition drive disruptive selection? An experimental test in natural populations of sticklebacks.
    Bolnick DI
    Evolution; 2004 Mar; 58(3):608-18. PubMed ID: 15119444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fluctuating population dynamics promotes the evolution of phenotypic plasticity.
    Svanbäck R; Pineda-Krch M; Doebeli M
    Am Nat; 2009 Aug; 174(2):176-89. PubMed ID: 19519278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sympatric speciation by sexual selection alone is unlikely.
    Arnegard ME; Kondrashov AS
    Evolution; 2004 Feb; 58(2):222-37. PubMed ID: 15068341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimization under frequency-dependent selection.
    Matessi C; Schneider KA
    Theor Popul Biol; 2009 Aug; 76(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 19285995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of genetic architecture on the evolution of assortative mating under frequency-dependent disruptive selection.
    Rettelbach A; Hermisson J; Dieckmann U; Kopp M
    Theor Popul Biol; 2011 May; 79(3):82-96. PubMed ID: 21192962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.