These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17237022)

  • 1. The effect of microbiological containment systems on dexterity.
    Sawyer J; Bennett A; Haines V; Elton E; Crago K; Speight S
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Mar; 4(3):166-73. PubMed ID: 17237022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing the level of dexterity offered by latex and nitrile SafeSkin gloves.
    Sawyer J; Bennett A
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Apr; 50(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 16357028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Elimination of mouse allergens in the working environment: assessment of individually ventilated cage systems and ventilated cabinets in the containment of mouse allergens.
    Gordon S; Fisher SW; Raymond RH
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2001 Aug; 108(2):288-94. PubMed ID: 11496249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of Protective Gloves for Use with Airfed Suits.
    Millard CE; Vaughan NP
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2015 Oct; 59(8):1022-33. PubMed ID: 26272645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Wearing the wrong size latex surgical gloves impairs manual dexterity.
    Drabek T; Boucek CD; Buffington CW
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2010 Mar; 7(3):152-5. PubMed ID: 20017056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Latex gloves and manual dexterity. A study of 50 Midwest dentists.
    Neiburger EJ
    N Y State Dent J; 1992 Jan; 58(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 1531254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of various thicknesses of chemical protective gloves on manual dexterity.
    Bensel CK
    Ergonomics; 1993 Jun; 36(6):687-96. PubMed ID: 8513775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the operator protection factors offered by positive pressure air suits against airborne microbiological challenge.
    Steward JA; Lever MS
    Viruses; 2012 Aug; 4(8):1202-11. PubMed ID: 23012620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of performance of three different types of respiratory protection devices.
    Lawrence RB; Duling MG; Calvert CA; Coffey CC
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2006 Sep; 3(9):465-74. PubMed ID: 16857645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microbiological safety cabinets: selection, installation, testing and use.
    Kennedy DA; Collins CH
    Br J Biomed Sci; 2000; 57(4):330-7. PubMed ID: 11204866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Open fronted safety cabinets in ventilated laboratories.
    Clark RP; Osborne RW; Pressey DC; Grover F; Keddie JR; Thomas C
    J Appl Bacteriol; 1990 Sep; 69(3):338-58. PubMed ID: 2246141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improving the biosafety of cell sorting by adaptation of a cell sorting system to a biosafety cabinet.
    Lennartz K; Lu M; Flasshove M; Moritz T; Kirstein U
    Cytometry A; 2005 Aug; 66(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 15973698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evolution of microbiological safety cabinets.
    Collins CH; Kennedy DA
    Br J Biomed Sci; 1999; 56(3):161-9. PubMed ID: 10824323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Wearing ambidextrous vinyl gloves does not impair manual dexterity.
    Drabek T; Boucek CD; Buffington CW
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2013; 10(6):307-11. PubMed ID: 23548060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Simulated workplace protection factors for half-facepiece respiratory protective devices.
    Duling MG; Lawrence RB; Slaven JE; Coffey CC
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Jun; 4(6):420-31. PubMed ID: 17474032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of double-gloving on manual dexterity and tactile sensation of surgeons.
    Fry DE; Harris WE; Kohnke EN; Twomey CL
    J Am Coll Surg; 2010 Mar; 210(3):325-30. PubMed ID: 20193896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Performance of open-fronted microbiological safety cabinets: the value of operator protection tests during routine servicing.
    Osborne R; Durkin T; Shannon H; Dornan E; Hughes C
    J Appl Microbiol; 1999 Jun; 86(6):962-70. PubMed ID: 10389245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. International Society for Analytical Cytology biosafety standard for sorting of unfixed cells.
    Schmid I; Lambert C; Ambrozak D; Marti GE; Moss DM; Perfetto SP;
    Cytometry A; 2007 Jun; 71(6):414-37. PubMed ID: 17385740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preparing cytotoxic agents in an isolator.
    Favier M; Hansel S; Bressolle F
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1993 Nov; 50(11):2335-9. PubMed ID: 8266957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Design modifications of a class II biological safety cabinet and user guidelines for enhancing safety.
    Stimpfel TM; Gershey EL
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1991 Jan; 52(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 1996536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.