These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17237045)

  • 1. Genomic characterization of multiple clinical phenotypes of cancer using multivariate linear regression models.
    Matsui S; Ito M; Nishiyama H; Uno H; Kotani H; Watanabe J; Guilford P; Reeve A; Fukushima M; Ogawa O
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Mar; 23(6):732-8. PubMed ID: 17237045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Penalized Cox regression analysis in the high-dimensional and low-sample size settings, with applications to microarray gene expression data.
    Gui J; Li H
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 21(13):3001-8. PubMed ID: 15814556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Independent component analysis-based penalized discriminant method for tumor classification using gene expression data.
    Huang DS; Zheng CH
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Aug; 22(15):1855-62. PubMed ID: 16709589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Gene selection in cancer classification using sparse logistic regression with Bayesian regularization.
    Cawley GC; Talbot NL
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Oct; 22(19):2348-55. PubMed ID: 16844704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A supervised approach for identifying discriminating genotype patterns and its application to breast cancer data.
    Yosef N; Yakhini Z; Tsalenko A; Kristensen V; Børresen-Dale AL; Ruppin E; Sharan R
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Jan; 23(2):e91-8. PubMed ID: 17237111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clustering threshold gradient descent regularization: with applications to microarray studies.
    Ma S; Huang J
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Feb; 23(4):466-72. PubMed ID: 17182700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clustering expressed genes on the basis of their association with a quantitative phenotype.
    Jia Z; Xu S
    Genet Res; 2005 Dec; 86(3):193-207. PubMed ID: 16454859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Structured polychotomous machine diagnosis of multiple cancer types using gene expression.
    Koo JY; Sohn I; Kim S; Lee JW
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Apr; 22(8):950-8. PubMed ID: 16452113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Classification of intramural metastases and lymph node metastases of esophageal cancer from gene expression based on boosting and projective adaptive resonance theory.
    Takahashi H; Aoyagi K; Nakanishi Y; Sasaki H; Yoshida T; Honda H
    J Biosci Bioeng; 2006 Jul; 102(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 16952836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predicting survival from microarray data--a comparative study.
    Bøvelstad HM; Nygård S; Størvold HL; Aldrin M; Borgan Ø; Frigessi A; Lingjaerde OC
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Aug; 23(16):2080-7. PubMed ID: 17553857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Identification of differentially expressed gene categories in microarray studies using nonparametric multivariate analysis.
    Nettleton D; Recknor J; Reecy JM
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Jan; 24(2):192-201. PubMed ID: 18042553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Identification of aberrant chromosomal regions from gene expression microarray studies applied to human breast cancer.
    Buness A; Kuner R; Ruschhaupt M; Poustka A; Sültmann H; Tresch A
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Sep; 23(17):2273-80. PubMed ID: 17599933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Annotation-based distance measures for patient subgroup discovery in clinical microarray studies.
    Lottaz C; Toedling J; Spang R
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Sep; 23(17):2256-64. PubMed ID: 17586546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. FM-test: a fuzzy-set-theory-based approach to differential gene expression data analysis.
    Liang LR; Lu S; Wang X; Lu Y; Mandal V; Patacsil D; Kumar D
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Dec; 7 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S7. PubMed ID: 17217525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantitative trait associated microarray gene expression data analysis.
    Qu Y; Xu S
    Mol Biol Evol; 2006 Aug; 23(8):1558-73. PubMed ID: 16731570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Gene selection via the BAHSIC family of algorithms.
    Song L; Bedo J; Borgwardt KM; Gretton A; Smola A
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Jul; 23(13):i490-8. PubMed ID: 17646335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Network-constrained regularization and variable selection for analysis of genomic data.
    Li C; Li H
    Bioinformatics; 2008 May; 24(9):1175-82. PubMed ID: 18310618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Statistical assessment of functional categories of genes deregulated in pathological conditions by using microarray data.
    Maglietta R; Piepoli A; Catalano D; Licciulli F; Carella M; Liuni S; Pesole G; Perri F; Ancona N
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Aug; 23(16):2063-72. PubMed ID: 17540679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dependence network modeling for biomarker identification.
    Qiu P; Wang ZJ; Liu KJ; Hu ZZ; Wu CH
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Jan; 23(2):198-206. PubMed ID: 17077095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Constructing the gene regulation-level representation of microarray data for cancer classification.
    Wong HS; Wang HQ
    J Biomed Inform; 2008 Feb; 41(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 17499026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.