107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17237454)
21. Utilities of dentin regeneration among insured and uninsured adults.
Ismail AI; Birch S; Sohn W; Lepkowski JM; Belli RF
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2004 Feb; 32(1):55-66. PubMed ID: 14961841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Preference-based quality of life in patients with Alzheimer's disease.
Karlawish JH; Zbrozek A; Kinosian B; Gregory A; Ferguson A; Glick HA
Alzheimers Dement; 2008 May; 4(3):193-202. PubMed ID: 18631968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Estimating preference scores in conventional and home nocturnal hemodialysis patients.
McFarlane PA; Pierratos A; Bayoumi AM; Redelmeier DA
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol; 2007 May; 2(3):477-83. PubMed ID: 17699454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Using preference-based measures to assess quality of life in stuttering.
Bramlett RE; Bothe AK; Franic DM
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):381-94. PubMed ID: 16671851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Assessment of respondent acceptability for preference measures in stuttering.
Franic DM; Bothe AK; Bramlett RE
J Commun Disord; 2012; 45(5):378-89. PubMed ID: 22682377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Obese versus non-obese patients with type 2 diabetes: patient-reported outcomes and utility of weight change.
Matza LS; Yurgin N; Boye KS; Malley K; Shorr JM
Curr Med Res Opin; 2007 Sep; 23(9):2051-62. PubMed ID: 17651535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Patient preference quality of life measures in dermatology.
McCombs K; Chen SC
Dermatol Ther; 2007; 20(2):102-9. PubMed ID: 17537138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Eliciting Canadian population preferences for health states using the Classification and Measurement System of Functional Health (CLAMES).
McIntosh CN; Connor Gorber S; Bernier J; Berthelot JM
Chronic Dis Can; 2007; 28(1-2):29-41. PubMed ID: 17953796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Caregivers' assessments of preference-based quality of life in Alzheimer's disease.
Karlawish JH; Zbrozek A; Kinosian B; Gregory A; Ferguson A; Low DV; Glick HA
Alzheimers Dement; 2008 May; 4(3):203-11. PubMed ID: 18631969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The construction of standard gamble utilities.
van Osch SM; Stiggelbout AM
Health Econ; 2008 Jan; 17(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 17410521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. What were they thinking when providing preference measurements for generic health states? The evidence for HUI3.
Feeny D; Furlong W; Torrance GW
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2018 Aug; 16(1):166. PubMed ID: 30111316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A model to estimate health utilities index mark 3 utility scores from WOMAC index scores in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee.
Grootendorst P; Marshall D; Pericak D; Bellamy N; Feeny D; Torrance GW
J Rheumatol; 2007 Mar; 34(3):534-42. PubMed ID: 17343301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The burden of multiple sclerosis: a community health survey.
Jones CA; Pohar SL; Warren S; Turpin KV; Warren KG
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2008 Jan; 6():1. PubMed ID: 18179687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Preferences for current health and their association with outcomes in patients with kidney disease.
Plantinga LC; Fink NE; Bass EB; Boulware LE; Meyer KB; Powe NR
Med Care; 2007 Mar; 45(3):230-7. PubMed ID: 17304080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A comparison of different strategies to collect standard gamble utilities.
Hammerschmidt T; Zeitler HP; Gulich M; Leidl R
Med Decis Making; 2004; 24(5):493-503. PubMed ID: 15358998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effect of ageing and body mass index on prostate-specific antigen levels among Chinese men in Singapore from a community-based study.
Chia SE; Lau WK; Chin CM; Tan J; Ho SH; Lee J; Cheng C
BJU Int; 2009 Jun; 103(11):1487-91. PubMed ID: 19076145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Modeling HUI 2 health state preference data using a nonparametric Bayesian method.
Kharroubi SA; McCabe C
Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(6):875-87. PubMed ID: 18971313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Assessment of respondent acceptability of preference measures: discriminatory power of graphic positioning scale versus traditional scaling measures.
Franic DM; Pathak DS
Value Health; 2003; 6(4):483-93. PubMed ID: 12859590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparing community-preference-based and direct standard gamble utility scores: evidence from elective total hip arthroplasty.
Feeny D; Blanchard C; Mahon JL; Bourne R; Rorabeck C; Stitt L; Webster-Bogaert S
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2003; 19(2):362-72. PubMed ID: 12862193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The standard gamble demonstrated lower reliability than the feeling thermometer.
Puhan MA; Guyatt GH; Montori VM; Bhandari M; Devereaux PJ; Griffith L; Goldstein R; Schünemann HJ
J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 May; 58(5):458-65. PubMed ID: 15845332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
