693 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17238257)
1. Solvated interaction energy (SIE) for scoring protein-ligand binding affinities. 1. Exploring the parameter space.
Naïm M; Bhat S; Rankin KN; Dennis S; Chowdhury SF; Siddiqi I; Drabik P; Sulea T; Bayly CI; Jakalian A; Purisima EO
J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(1):122-33. PubMed ID: 17238257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Solvated interaction energy (SIE) for scoring protein-ligand binding affinities. 2. Benchmark in the CSAR-2010 scoring exercise.
Sulea T; Cui Q; Purisima EO
J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Sep; 51(9):2066-81. PubMed ID: 21714553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Estimating protein-ligand binding free energy: atomic solvation parameters for partition coefficient and solvation free energy calculation.
Pei J; Wang Q; Zhou J; Lai L
Proteins; 2004 Dec; 57(4):651-64. PubMed ID: 15390269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. What determines the van der Waals coefficient beta in the LIE (linear interaction energy) method to estimate binding free energies using molecular dynamics simulations?
Wang W; Wang J; Kollman PA
Proteins; 1999 Feb; 34(3):395-402. PubMed ID: 10024025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Absolute and relative binding free energy calculations of the interaction of biotin and its analogs with streptavidin using molecular dynamics/free energy perturbation approaches.
Miyamoto S; Kollman PA
Proteins; 1993 Jul; 16(3):226-45. PubMed ID: 8346190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prediction of ligand binding affinity and orientation of xenoestrogens to the estrogen receptor by molecular dynamics simulations and the linear interaction energy method.
van Lipzig MM; ter Laak AM; Jongejan A; Vermeulen NP; Wamelink M; Geerke D; Meerman JH
J Med Chem; 2004 Feb; 47(4):1018-30. PubMed ID: 14761204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prediction of ligand-receptor binding thermodynamics by free energy force field three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship analysis: applications to a set of glucose analogue inhibitors of glycogen phosphorylase.
Venkatarangan P; Hopfinger AJ
J Med Chem; 1999 Jun; 42(12):2169-79. PubMed ID: 10377222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Examining methods for calculations of binding free energies: LRA, LIE, PDLD-LRA, and PDLD/S-LRA calculations of ligands binding to an HIV protease.
Sham YY; Chu ZT; Tao H; Warshel A
Proteins; 2000 Jun; 39(4):393-407. PubMed ID: 10813821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Continuum solvation models in the linear interaction energy method.
Carlsson J; Andér M; Nervall M; Aqvist J
J Phys Chem B; 2006 Jun; 110(24):12034-41. PubMed ID: 16800513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Linear interaction energy models for beta-secretase (BACE) inhibitors: Role of van der Waals, electrostatic, and continuum-solvation terms.
Tounge BA; Rajamani R; Baxter EW; Reitz AB; Reynolds CH
J Mol Graph Model; 2006 May; 24(6):475-84. PubMed ID: 16293430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Application of the frozen atom approximation to the GB/SA continuum model for solvation free energy.
Guvench O; Weiser J; Shenkin P; Kolossváry I; Still WC
J Comput Chem; 2002 Jan; 23(2):214-21. PubMed ID: 11924735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An all atom energy based computational protocol for predicting binding affinities of protein-ligand complexes.
Jain T; Jayaram B
FEBS Lett; 2005 Dec; 579(29):6659-66. PubMed ID: 16307743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of end-point continuum-solvation methods for the calculation of protein-ligand binding free energies.
Genheden S; Ryde U
Proteins; 2012 May; 80(5):1326-42. PubMed ID: 22274991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Universal solvation model based on solute electron density and on a continuum model of the solvent defined by the bulk dielectric constant and atomic surface tensions.
Marenich AV; Cramer CJ; Truhlar DG
J Phys Chem B; 2009 May; 113(18):6378-96. PubMed ID: 19366259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Calculation of the free energy of polarization: quantifying the effect of explicitly treating electronic polarization on the transferability of force-field parameters.
Geerke DP; van Gunsteren WF
J Phys Chem B; 2007 Jun; 111(23):6425-36. PubMed ID: 17508737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. PEARLS: program for energetic analysis of receptor-ligand system.
Han LY; Lin HH; Li ZR; Zheng CJ; Cao ZW; Xie B; Chen YZ
J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(1):445-50. PubMed ID: 16426079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. On the nonpolar hydration free energy of proteins: surface area and continuum solvent models for the solute-solvent interaction energy.
Levy RM; Zhang LY; Gallicchio E; Felts AK
J Am Chem Soc; 2003 Aug; 125(31):9523-30. PubMed ID: 12889983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The consequences of scoring docked ligand conformations using free energy correlations.
Spyrakis F; Amadasi A; Fornabaio M; Abraham DJ; Mozzarelli A; Kellogg GE; Cozzini P
Eur J Med Chem; 2007 Jul; 42(7):921-33. PubMed ID: 17346861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Aqueous solvation free energies of ions and ion-water clusters based on an accurate value for the absolute aqueous solvation free energy of the proton.
Kelly CP; Cramer CJ; Truhlar DG
J Phys Chem B; 2006 Aug; 110(32):16066-81. PubMed ID: 16898764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessing scoring functions for protein-ligand interactions.
Ferrara P; Gohlke H; Price DJ; Klebe G; Brooks CL
J Med Chem; 2004 Jun; 47(12):3032-47. PubMed ID: 15163185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
