259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17238265)
1. Optimizing fragment and scaffold docking by use of molecular interaction fingerprints.
Marcou G; Rognan D
J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(1):195-207. PubMed ID: 17238265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Maximum common binding modes (MCBM): consensus docking scoring using multiple ligand information and interaction fingerprints.
Renner S; Derksen S; Radestock S; Mörchen F
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Feb; 48(2):319-32. PubMed ID: 18211051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Scaffold hopping through virtual screening using 2D and 3D similarity descriptors: ranking, voting, and consensus scoring.
Zhang Q; Muegge I
J Med Chem; 2006 Mar; 49(5):1536-48. PubMed ID: 16509572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Virtual screening to enrich a compound collection with CDK2 inhibitors using docking, scoring, and composite scoring models.
Cotesta S; Giordanetto F; Trosset JY; Crivori P; Kroemer RT; Stouten PF; Vulpetti A
Proteins; 2005 Sep; 60(4):629-43. PubMed ID: 16028223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prediction of multiple binding modes of the CDK2 inhibitors, anilinopyrazoles, using the automated docking programs GOLD, FlexX, and LigandFit: an evaluation of performance.
Sato H; Shewchuk LM; Tang J
J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(6):2552-62. PubMed ID: 17125195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions.
Warren GL; Andrews CW; Capelli AM; Clarke B; LaLonde J; Lambert MH; Lindvall M; Nevins N; Semus SF; Senger S; Tedesco G; Wall ID; Woolven JM; Peishoff CE; Head MS
J Med Chem; 2006 Oct; 49(20):5912-31. PubMed ID: 17004707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Protein structures in virtual screening: a case study with CDK2.
Thomas MP; McInnes C; Fischer PM
J Med Chem; 2006 Jan; 49(1):92-104. PubMed ID: 16392795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative evaluation of eight docking tools for docking and virtual screening accuracy.
Kellenberger E; Rodrigo J; Muller P; Rognan D
Proteins; 2004 Nov; 57(2):225-42. PubMed ID: 15340911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 2. Enrichment factors in database screening.
Halgren TA; Murphy RB; Friesner RA; Beard HS; Frye LL; Pollard WT; Banks JL
J Med Chem; 2004 Mar; 47(7):1750-9. PubMed ID: 15027866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optimizing the signal-to-noise ratio of scoring functions for protein--ligand docking.
Seifert MH
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Mar; 48(3):602-12. PubMed ID: 18293951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. New scoring functions for virtual screening from molecular dynamics simulations with a quantum-refined force-field (QRFF-MD). Application to cyclin-dependent kinase 2.
Ferrara P; Curioni A; Vangrevelinghe E; Meyer T; Mordasini T; Andreoni W; Acklin P; Jacoby E
J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(1):254-63. PubMed ID: 16426061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Surflex: fully automatic flexible molecular docking using a molecular similarity-based search engine.
Jain AN
J Med Chem; 2003 Feb; 46(4):499-511. PubMed ID: 12570372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The consequences of scoring docked ligand conformations using free energy correlations.
Spyrakis F; Amadasi A; Fornabaio M; Abraham DJ; Mozzarelli A; Kellogg GE; Cozzini P
Eur J Med Chem; 2007 Jul; 42(7):921-33. PubMed ID: 17346861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. General and targeted statistical potentials for protein-ligand interactions.
Mooij WT; Verdonk ML
Proteins; 2005 Nov; 61(2):272-87. PubMed ID: 16106379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. DrugScore(CSD)-knowledge-based scoring function derived from small molecule crystal data with superior recognition rate of near-native ligand poses and better affinity prediction.
Velec HF; Gohlke H; Klebe G
J Med Chem; 2005 Oct; 48(20):6296-303. PubMed ID: 16190756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Critical assessment of the automated AutoDock as a new docking tool for virtual screening.
Park H; Lee J; Lee S
Proteins; 2006 Nov; 65(3):549-54. PubMed ID: 16988956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Knowledge-based interaction fingerprint scoring: a simple method for improving the effectiveness of fast scoring functions.
Mpamhanga CP; Chen B; McLay IM; Willett P
J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(2):686-98. PubMed ID: 16562999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An efficient tool for identifying inhibitors based on 3D-QSAR and docking using feature-shape pharmacophore of biologically active conformation--a case study with CDK2/cyclinA.
Mascarenhas NM; Ghoshal N
Eur J Med Chem; 2008 Dec; 43(12):2807-18. PubMed ID: 18037537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cross-docking of inhibitors into CDK2 structures. 1.
Duca JS; Madison VS; Voigt JH
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Mar; 48(3):659-68. PubMed ID: 18324799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Automatic and efficient decomposition of two-dimensional structures of small molecules for fragment-based high-throughput docking.
Kolb P; Caflisch A
J Med Chem; 2006 Dec; 49(25):7384-92. PubMed ID: 17149868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
