These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17238337)

  • 1. The feasibility of digital pen and paper technology for vital sign data capture in acute care settings.
    Dykes PC; Benoit A; Chang F; Gallagher J; Li Q; Spurr C; McGrath EJ; Kilroy SM; Prater M
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2006; 2006():229-33. PubMed ID: 17238337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The digital pen and paper. Evaluation and acceptance of a new data acquisition device in clinical settings.
    Despont-Gros C; Landau R; Rutschmann O; Simon J; Lovis C
    Methods Inf Med; 2005; 44(3):359-68. PubMed ID: 16113758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nurses' perceptions of an electronic patient record from a patient safety perspective: a qualitative study.
    Stevenson JE; Nilsson G
    J Adv Nurs; 2012 Mar; 68(3):667-76. PubMed ID: 21781148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A graphical ICU workstation.
    Higgins SB; Jiang K; Swindell BB; Bernard GR
    Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care; 1991; ():783-7. PubMed ID: 1807712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of OLD@HOME virtual health record staff opinions of the system and satisfaction with work.
    Engström M; Scandurra I; Ljunggren B; Lindqvist R; Koch S; Carlsson M
    Telemed J E Health; 2009 Jan; 15(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 19199848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Examining nursing vital signs documentation workflow: barriers and opportunities in general internal medicine units.
    Yeung MS; Lapinsky SE; Granton JT; Doran DM; Cafazzo JA
    J Clin Nurs; 2012 Apr; 21(7-8):975-82. PubMed ID: 22243491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Understanding the dynamics of information technology implementation: a study of clinical information systems.
    Paré G; Elam JJ
    Medinfo; 1995; 8 Pt 1():544. PubMed ID: 8591258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Usability testing of digital pen and paper system in nursing documentation.
    Yen PY; Gorman P
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2005; 2005():844-8. PubMed ID: 16779159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. No paper, but the same routines: a qualitative exploration of experiences in two Norwegian hospitals deprived of the paper based medical record.
    Lium JT; Tjora A; Faxvaag A
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2008 Jan; 8():2. PubMed ID: 18186935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating physician satisfaction regarding user interactions with an electronic medical record system.
    Sittig DF; Kuperman GJ; Fiskio J
    Proc AMIA Symp; 1999; ():400-4. PubMed ID: 10566389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Physician clinical communication systems--an Australian perspective.
    Soliman F; Soar J
    J Med Syst; 1997 Apr; 21(2):99-106. PubMed ID: 9297618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Survey of nurse perceptions regarding the utilization of bedside computers.
    Willson D
    Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care; 1994; ():553-7. PubMed ID: 7949989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Examining the symptom experience of hospitalized patients using a pen-based computer.
    Reilly CA
    Proc AMIA Symp; 1999; ():364-8. PubMed ID: 10566382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Survey says: care, communication enhanced by IT. Nurses report ups and downs of current systems.
    Sensmeier J
    Nurs Manage; 2006 Oct; Suppl():2, 4, 6 passim. PubMed ID: 17016162
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electronic documentation on a psychiatric unit.
    Tiessen B; Doan K; Benoit L
    Can Nurse; 2001 Nov; 97(10):27-9. PubMed ID: 11765435
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The digital pen and paper technology: implementation and use in an existing clinical information system.
    Despont-Gros C; Bœuf C; Geissbuhler A; Lovis C
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2005; 116():328-33. PubMed ID: 16160280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Nursing personnel attitudes prior to the introduction of informatic tools and contemporary vision of a hospital information system].
    Vereecke PJ
    Rech Soins Infirm; 1996 Sep; (46):83-93. PubMed ID: 16737037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Issues to consider before investing in bedside terminal systems.
    Blank M; Bauer A
    Hosp Technol Ser; 1991 Dec; 10(30):1-17. PubMed ID: 10116019
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perceived ease of use and usefulness of bedside-computer systems.
    Dillon TW; McDowell D; Salimian F; Conklin D
    Comput Nurs; 1998; 16(3):151-6. PubMed ID: 9611866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Paper-based versus computer-based records in the emergency department: staff preferences, expectations, and concerns.
    Ayatollahi H; Bath PA; Goodacre S
    Health Informatics J; 2009 Sep; 15(3):199-211. PubMed ID: 19713395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.