These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17238401)

  • 21. Inpatient verbal orders and the impact of computerized provider order entry.
    Kaplan JM; Ancheta R; Jacobs BR;
    J Pediatr; 2006 Oct; 149(4):461-7. PubMed ID: 17011314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of provider-selected order indications on appropriateness of antimicrobial orders in a pediatric hospital.
    Nomura Y; Garcia M; Child J; Hurst AL; Hyman D; Poppy A; Palmer C; Ranade D; Pyle L; Parker SK
    Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2018 Feb; 75(4):213-221. PubMed ID: 29436467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The architecture of sharing. An HL7 Version 3 framework offers semantically interoperable healthcare information.
    Jones TM; Mead CN
    Healthc Inform; 2005 Nov; 22(11):35-6, 38. PubMed ID: 16355527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A guideline-derived model to facilitate the implementation of test-ordering rules within a hospital information system.
    Yasini M; Duclos C; Venot A; Lepage E; Lamy JB
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 192():719-23. PubMed ID: 23920651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Embedded guideline information without patient specificity in a commercial emergency department computerized order-entry system.
    Asaro PV; Sheldahl AL; Char DM
    Acad Emerg Med; 2006 Apr; 13(4):452-8. PubMed ID: 16531590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. HL7 Structured Product Labeling - electronic prescribing information for provider order entry decision support.
    Schadow G
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2005; 2005():1108. PubMed ID: 16779395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Computerized physician order entry and decision support improves ED analgesic ordering for renal colic.
    Netherton SJ; Lonergan K; Wang D; McRae A; Lang E
    Am J Emerg Med; 2014 Sep; 32(9):958-61. PubMed ID: 24997107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Mixed results in the safety performance of computerized physician order entry.
    Metzger J; Welebob E; Bates DW; Lipsitz S; Classen DC
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2010 Apr; 29(4):655-63. PubMed ID: 20368595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Monitoring clinical decision support in the electronic health record.
    Lam JH; Ng O
    Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2017 Aug; 74(15):1130-1133. PubMed ID: 28743777
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The use of interactive computerized order sets to improve outcomes.
    Peshek SC; Cubera K; Gleespen L
    Qual Manag Health Care; 2010; 19(3):239-47. PubMed ID: 20523262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Usability evaluation of order sets in a computerised provider order entry system.
    Chan J; Shojania KG; Easty AC; Etchells EE
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2011 Nov; 20(11):932-40. PubMed ID: 21807652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Preparation and use of preconstructed orders, order sets, and order menus in a computerized provider order entry system.
    Payne TH; Hoey PJ; Nichol P; Lovis C
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2003; 10(4):322-9. PubMed ID: 12668686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The process of development of a prioritization tool for a clinical decision support build within a computerized provider order entry system: Experiences from St Luke's Health System.
    Wolf M; Miller S; DeJong D; House JA; Dirks C; Beasley B
    Health Informatics J; 2016 Sep; 22(3):579-93. PubMed ID: 25814483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Real-time forecasting of pediatric intensive care unit length of stay using computerized provider orders.
    Levin SR; Harley ET; Fackler JC; Lehmann CU; Custer JW; France D; Zeger SL
    Crit Care Med; 2012 Nov; 40(11):3058-64. PubMed ID: 22824935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Order sets in electronic health records: principles of good practice.
    McGreevey JD
    Chest; 2013 Jan; 143(1):228-235. PubMed ID: 23276846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Computerized prescriber order entry and opportunities for medication errors: comparison to tradition paper-based order entry.
    Jozefczyk KG; Kennedy WK; Lin MJ; Achatz J; Glass MD; Eidam WS; Melroy MJ
    J Pharm Pract; 2013 Aug; 26(4):434-7. PubMed ID: 23462046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The role of computerized order sets in pediatric inpatient asthma treatment.
    Chisolm DJ; McAlearney AS; Veneris S; Fisher D; Holtzlander M; McCoy KS
    Pediatr Allergy Immunol; 2006 May; 17(3):199-206. PubMed ID: 16672007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Critical drug-drug interactions for use in electronic health records systems with computerized physician order entry: review of leading approaches.
    Classen DC; Phansalkar S; Bates DW
    J Patient Saf; 2011 Jun; 7(2):61-5. PubMed ID: 21577077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Changing patient care orders from paper to computerized provider order entry-based process.
    Brokel JM; Ward MM; Wakefield DS; Ludwig A; Schwichtenberg T; Atherton D
    Comput Inform Nurs; 2012 Aug; 30(8):417-25. PubMed ID: 22466865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Decaying relevance of clinical data towards future decisions in data-driven inpatient clinical order sets.
    Chen JH; Alagappan M; Goldstein MK; Asch SM; Altman RB
    Int J Med Inform; 2017 Jun; 102():71-79. PubMed ID: 28495350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.