These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17238438)

  • 1. Paper versus electronic documentation in complex chronic illness: a comparison.
    Smith CA; Haque SN
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2006; 2006():734-8. PubMed ID: 17238438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A model for documentation of spina bifida.
    Parsch K
    Paraplegia; 1970 Aug; 8(2):82-6. PubMed ID: 4918472
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Documentation and coding of ED patient encounters: an evaluation of the accuracy of an electronic medical record.
    Silfen E
    Am J Emerg Med; 2006 Oct; 24(6):664-78. PubMed ID: 16984834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mother knows best: medical record management for patients with spina bifida during the transition from pediatric to adult care.
    Østerlund CS; Dosa NP; Arnott Smith C
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2005; 2005():580-4. PubMed ID: 16779106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of the impact on time to complete medical record using an electronic medical record versus a paper record on emergency department patients: a study.
    Perry JJ; Sutherland J; Symington C; Dorland K; Mansour M; Stiell IG
    Emerg Med J; 2014 Dec; 31(12):980-5. PubMed ID: 23975593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An analysis of the paper-based health record: information content and its implications for electronic patient records.
    Geiger G; Merrilees K; Walo R; Gordon D; Kunov H
    Medinfo; 1995; 8 Pt 1():295. PubMed ID: 8591176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of self-documentation in diabetics: electronic versus paper diaries.
    Kerkenbush NL
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2003; 2003():887. PubMed ID: 14728392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of an electronic medical record on the completeness of documentation in the anesthesia record.
    Jang J; Yu SH; Kim CB; Moon Y; Kim S
    Int J Med Inform; 2013 Aug; 82(8):702-7. PubMed ID: 23731825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Description and comparison of quality of electronic versus paper-based resident admission forms in Australian aged care facilities.
    Wang N; Yu P; Hailey D
    Int J Med Inform; 2013 May; 82(5):313-24. PubMed ID: 23254294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors influencing the quality of medical documentation when a paper-based medical records system is replaced with an electronic medical records system: an Iranian case study.
    Pourasghar F; Malekafzali H; Koch S; Fors U
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(4):445-51. PubMed ID: 18828939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Paper versus computer: feasibility of an electronic medical record in general pediatrics.
    Roukema J; Los RK; Bleeker SE; van Ginneken AM; van der Lei J; Moll HA
    Pediatrics; 2006 Jan; 117(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 16396855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing paper-based with electronic patient records: lessons learned during a study on diagnosis and procedure codes.
    Stausberg J; Koch D; Ingenerf J; Betzler M
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2003; 10(5):470-7. PubMed ID: 12807808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Randomised trial comparing the recording ability of a novel, electronic emergency documentation system with the AHA paper cardiac arrest record.
    Grigg E; Palmer A; Grigg J; Oppenheimer P; Wu T; Roesler A; Nair B; Ross B
    Emerg Med J; 2014 Oct; 31(10):833-9. PubMed ID: 23896590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing the impact of an electronic medical record on nurse documentation time.
    Hakes B; Whittington J
    Comput Inform Nurs; 2008; 26(4):234-41. PubMed ID: 18600132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Beyond multidisciplinary care: a new conceptual model for spina bifida services.
    Kinsman SL; Levey E; Ruffing V; Stone J; Warren L
    Eur J Pediatr Surg; 2000 Dec; 10 Suppl 1():35-8. PubMed ID: 11214831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Health care expenditures of children and adults with spina bifida in a privately insured U.S. population.
    Ouyang L; Grosse SD; Armour BS; Waitzman NJ
    Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2007 Jul; 79(7):552-8. PubMed ID: 17335056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nurses' perceptions of an electronic patient record from a patient safety perspective: a qualitative study.
    Stevenson JE; Nilsson G
    J Adv Nurs; 2012 Mar; 68(3):667-76. PubMed ID: 21781148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Innovations and research review: the impact of the HELP computer system on the LDS Hospital paper medical record.
    Kuperman GJ; Maack BB; Bauer K; Gardner RM
    Top Health Rec Manage; 1991 Nov; 12(2):76-85. PubMed ID: 10114768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Primary and secondary record management in electronic patient record systems.
    McLendon K
    Top Health Inf Manage; 1996 Feb; 16(3):52-7. PubMed ID: 10156201
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A study design for comparing electronic patient care report (ePCR) with paper PCR in pre-hospital care.
    Saini D; Sandhu A; Gori MM; Orthner HF
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2005; 2005():1103. PubMed ID: 16779390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.