These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17238448)

  • 21. The structure of guideline recommendations: a synthesis.
    Tu SW; Campbell J; Musen MA
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2003; 2003():679-83. PubMed ID: 14728259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Achieving reuse of computable guideline systems.
    Johnson P; Tu S; Jones N
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001; 84(Pt 1):99-103. PubMed ID: 11604714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A pattern-based analysis of clinical computer-interpretable guideline modeling languages.
    Mulyar N; van der Aalst WM; Peleg M
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2007; 14(6):781-7. PubMed ID: 17712087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Encoding and verification of a computer-interpretable guideline: a case study of pressure-ulcer management.
    Kim HY; Park HA; Cho I; Kim J; Lee J
    Health Inf Manag; 2015; 44(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 27092468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Representation primitives, process models and patient data in computer-interpretable clinical practice guidelines: a literature review of guideline representation models.
    Wang D; Peleg M; Tu SW; Boxwala AA; Greenes RA; Patel VL; Shortliffe EH
    Int J Med Inform; 2002 Dec; 68(1-3):59-70. PubMed ID: 12467791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. How updating textual clinical practice guidelines impacts clinical decision support systems: a case study with bladder cancer management.
    Bouaud J; Séroussi B; Brizon A; Culty T; Mentré F; Ravery V
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2007; 129(Pt 2):829-33. PubMed ID: 17911832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A formal approach to the analysis of clinical computer-interpretable guideline modeling languages.
    Grando MA; Glasspool D; Fox J
    Artif Intell Med; 2012 Jan; 54(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 21788121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Leveraging point-of-care clinician feedback to study barriers to guideline adherence.
    Chan AS; Shankar RD; Coleman RW; Matins SB; Hoffman BB; Goldstein MK
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2005; 2005():915. PubMed ID: 16779202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Authoring tool: acquiring sharable knowledge for Smart CDSS.
    Ali T; Hussain M; Ali Khan W; Afzal M; Lee S
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():1278-81. PubMed ID: 24109928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Assessment of a personalized and distributed patient guidance system.
    Peleg M; Shahar Y; Quaglini S; Broens T; Budasu R; Fung N; Fux A; García-Sáez G; Goldstein A; González-Ferrer A; Hermens H; Hernando ME; Jones V; Klebanov G; Klimov D; Knoppel D; Larburu N; Marcos C; Martínez-Sarriegui I; Napolitano C; Pallàs À; Palomares A; Parimbelli E; Pons B; Rigla M; Sacchi L; Shalom E; Soffer P; van Schooten B
    Int J Med Inform; 2017 May; 101():108-130. PubMed ID: 28347441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Computer-Interpretable Guideline formalisms.
    De Clercq P; Kaiser K; Hasman A
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 139():22-43. PubMed ID: 18806319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparing computer-interpretable guideline models: a case-study approach.
    Peleg M; Tu S; Bury J; Ciccarese P; Fox J; Greenes RA; Hall R; Johnson PD; Jones N; Kumar A; Miksch S; Quaglini S; Seyfang A; Shortliffe EH; Stefanelli M
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2003; 10(1):52-68. PubMed ID: 12509357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Mark-up based analysis of narrative guidelines with the Stepper tool.
    Růzicka M; Svátek V
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 101():132-6. PubMed ID: 15537215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Reminder-based or on-demand decision support systems: a preliminary study in primary care with the management of hypertension.
    Séroussi B; Bouaud J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 101():142-6. PubMed ID: 15537217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Modeling data and knowledge in the EON guideline architecture.
    Tu SW; Musen MA
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001; 84(Pt 1):280-4. PubMed ID: 11604749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Developing nursing computer interpretable guidelines: a feasibility study of heart failure guidelines in homecare.
    Topaz M; Shalom E; Masterson-Creber R; Rhadakrishnan K; Monsen KA; Bowles KH
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2013; 2013():1353-61. PubMed ID: 24551412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A multiple-scenario assessment of the effect of a continuous-care, guideline-based decision support system on clinicians' compliance to clinical guidelines.
    Shalom E; Shahar Y; Parmet Y; Lunenfeld E
    Int J Med Inform; 2015 Apr; 84(4):248-62. PubMed ID: 25649843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An interoperable clinical decision-support system for early detection of SIRS in pediatric intensive care using openEHR.
    Wulff A; Haarbrandt B; Tute E; Marschollek M; Beerbaum P; Jack T
    Artif Intell Med; 2018 Jul; 89():10-23. PubMed ID: 29753616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Identifying barriers to hypertension guideline adherence using clinician feedback at the point of care.
    Lin ND; Martins SB; Chan AS; Coleman RW; Bosworth HB; Oddone EZ; Shankar RD; Musen MA; Hoffman BB; Goldstein MK
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2006; 2006():494-8. PubMed ID: 17238390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Coupling computer-interpretable guidelines with a drug-database through a web-based system--The PRESGUID project.
    Dufour JC; Fieschi D; Fieschi M
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2004 Mar; 4():2. PubMed ID: 15053828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.