These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17238461)

  • 1. Comparing perceptions and use of a commercial electronic medical record (EMR) between primary care and subspecialty physicians.
    Allareddy V; Allareddy V; Kaelber DC
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2006; 2006():841. PubMed ID: 17238461
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of a commercial electronic medical record (EMR) by primary care physicians 5 years after implementation.
    Kaelber D; Greco P; Cebul RD
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2005; 2005():1002. PubMed ID: 16779289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attitudes of academic-based and community-based physicians regarding EMR use during outpatient encounters.
    Penrod LE; Gadd CS
    Proc AMIA Symp; 2001; ():528-32. PubMed ID: 11825244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. If electronic medical records are so great, why aren't family physicians using them?
    Loomis GA; Ries JS; Saywell RM; Thakker NR
    J Fam Pract; 2002 Jul; 51(7):636-41. PubMed ID: 12160503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electronic medical records: are physicians ready?
    Dansky KH; Gamm LD; Vasey JJ; Barsukiewicz CK
    J Healthc Manag; 1999; 44(6):440-54; discussion 454-5. PubMed ID: 10662431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A physician's perspective: deploying the EMR.
    Smith D; Newell LM
    J Healthc Inf Manag; 2002; 16(2):71-9. PubMed ID: 11941926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dichotomy between physicians' and patients' attitudes regarding EMR use during outpatient encounters.
    Gadd CS; Penrod LE
    Proc AMIA Symp; 2000; ():275-9. PubMed ID: 11079888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. AOFAS member experience with computerization of the office.
    Michelson JD; Speer JA
    Foot Ankle Int; 2005 Aug; 26(8):645-55. PubMed ID: 16115423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the implementation of an electronic medical record.
    Raman S; Harris IB; Connelly DP; Speedie SM; Daniels B
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2003; 2003():979. PubMed ID: 14728483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing user perceptions of an electronic patient record (EPR) before implementation.
    Chambers S; Spence J; Taylor D; Walji M; Valenza JA
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2007 Oct; ():896. PubMed ID: 18693996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Implementation of an electronic medical record system in previously computer-naïve primary care centres: a pilot study from Cyprus.
    Samoutis G; Soteriades ES; Kounalakis DK; Zachariadou T; Philalithis A; Lionis C
    Inform Prim Care; 2007; 15(4):207-16. PubMed ID: 18237477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Introduction of computerized medical records. A survey of primary physicians.
    Urkin J; Goldfarb D; Weintraub D
    Int J Adolesc Med Health; 2003; 15(2):153-60. PubMed ID: 12955817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An electronic medical record in primary care: impact on satisfaction, work efficiency and clinic processes.
    Joos D; Chen Q; Jirjis J; Johnson KB
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2006; 2006():394-8. PubMed ID: 17238370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. User requirements for the computerized patient record: physician opinions.
    Smith WR; Zastrow R
    Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care; 1994; ():994. PubMed ID: 7950099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Primary care clinician attitudes towards electronic clinical reminders and clinical practice guidelines.
    Gandhi TK; Sequist TD; Poon EG; Karson AS; Murff H; Fairchild DG; Kuperman GJ; Bates DW
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2003; 2003():848. PubMed ID: 14728353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measuring the success of electronic medical record implementation using electronic and survey data.
    Keshavjee K; Troyan S; Holbrook AM; VanderMolen D;
    Proc AMIA Symp; 2001; ():309-13. PubMed ID: 11825201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Physician perceptions of an Electronic Health Record-based Clinical Trial Alert system: a survey of study participants.
    Embi PJ; Jain A; Harris CM
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2005; 2005():949. PubMed ID: 16779236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing physician attitudes regarding use of an outpatient EMR: a longitudinal, multi-practice study.
    Gadd CS; Penrod LE
    Proc AMIA Symp; 2001; ():194-8. PubMed ID: 11825179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Primary care clinician attitudes towards ambulatory computerized physician order entry.
    Gandhi TK; Poon EG; Sequist TD; Johnson R; Pizziferri L; Karson AS; Bates DW
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2005; 2005():961. PubMed ID: 16779248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Physician buy-in for an EMR.
    Hier DB
    Healthc Inform; 2002 Oct; 19(10):37-40. PubMed ID: 12440304
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.