These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17238499)

  • 1. Effect of e-mail versus postal reminders for mammogram screening.
    Chaudhry R; Cabanela R; Rahman A; McMurtry E; Leutink D; Scheitel S; Naessens JM
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2006; 2006():879. PubMed ID: 17238499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. SMS text pre-notification and delivery of reminder e-mails to increase response rates to postal questionnaires in the SUSPEND trial: a factorial design, randomised controlled trial.
    Starr K; McPherson G; Forrest M; Cotton SC
    Trials; 2015 Jul; 16():295. PubMed ID: 26152519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electronic reminders did not improve postal questionnaire response rates or response times: a randomized controlled trial.
    Man MS; Tilbrook HE; Jayakody S; Hewitt CE; Cox H; Cross B; Torgerson DJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Sep; 64(9):1001-4. PubMed ID: 21292441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A randomized intervention to improve ongoing participation in mammography.
    Barr JK; Franks AL; Lee NC; Antonucci DM; Rifkind S; Schachter M
    Am J Manag Care; 2001 Sep; 7(9):887-94. PubMed ID: 11570022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effectiveness of computer reminders versus postal reminders for improving quality assessment for point-of-care testing in primary care: a randomized controlled trial.
    Siersma V; Kousgaard MB; Reventlow S; Ertmann R; Felding P; Waldorff FB
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2015 Feb; 21(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 24953533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of reminder methods in selected adolescents with records in an immunization registry.
    Morris J; Wang W; Wang L; Peddecord KM; Sawyer MH
    J Adolesc Health; 2015 May; 56(5 Suppl):S27-32. PubMed ID: 25863551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A randomized trial found online questionnaires supplemented by postal reminders generated a cost-effective and generalizable sample but don't forget the reminders.
    Loban A; Mandefield L; Hind D; Bradburn M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Dec; 92():116-125. PubMed ID: 28844786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of patient and physician reminders on use of screening mammography in a health maintenance organization. Results of a randomized controlled trial.
    Burack RC; Gimotty PA; George J; Simon MS; Dews P; Moncrease A
    Cancer; 1996 Oct; 78(8):1708-21. PubMed ID: 8859184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of mailed reminders and tailored messages on mammography screening.
    McCaul KD; Wold KS
    J Community Health; 2002 Jun; 27(3):181-90. PubMed ID: 12027268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of two types of sms-texts on the uptake of screening mammogram: a randomized controlled trial.
    Lakkis NA; Atfeh AM; El-Zein YR; Mahmassani DM; Hamadeh GN
    Prev Med; 2011 Oct; 53(4-5):325-7. PubMed ID: 21871480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effectiveness of a secure email reminder system for colorectal cancer screening.
    Muller D; Logan J; Dorr D; Mosen D
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2009 Nov; 2009():457-61. PubMed ID: 20351899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Increasing follow-up questionnaire response rates in a randomized controlled trial of telehealth for depression: three embedded controlled studies.
    Edwards L; Salisbury C; Horspool K; Foster A; Garner K; Montgomery AA
    Trials; 2016 Feb; 17(1):107. PubMed ID: 26912230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. E-mail invitations to general practitioners were as effective as postal invitations and were more efficient.
    Treweek S; Barnett K; Maclennan G; Bonetti D; Eccles MP; Francis JJ; Jones C; Pitts NB; Ricketts IW; Weal M; Sullivan F
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Jul; 65(7):793-7. PubMed ID: 22306007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improving follow-up survey completion rates through pilot interventions in the All of Us Research Program: Results from a non-randomized intervention study.
    Cronin RM; Feng X; Able A; Sutherland S; Givens B; Johnston R; Depry C; Le Blanc KW; Caro O; Mapes B; Denny J; Couper MP; Chen Q; Prabhu Das I
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(10):e0308995. PubMed ID: 39405295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can postal prompts from general practitioners improve the uptake of breast screening? A randomised controlled trial in one east London general practice.
    O'Connor AM; Griffiths CJ; Underwood MR; Eldridge S
    J Med Screen; 1998; 5(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 9575461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cancer Screening Reminders: Addressing the Spectrum of Patient Preferences.
    Brandzel SD; Bowles EJA; Wieneke A; Bradford SC; Kimbel K; Gao H; Buist DS
    Perm J; 2017; 21():17-051. PubMed ID: 29035189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A randomized trial of electronic reminders showed a reduction in the time to respond to postal questionnaires.
    Ashby R; Turner G; Cross B; Mitchell N; Torgerson D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Feb; 64(2):208-12. PubMed ID: 20554428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing Web and Mail Protocols for Administering Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Surveys.
    Fowler FJ; Brenner PS; Hargraves JL; Cleary PD
    Med Care; 2021 Oct; 59(10):907-912. PubMed ID: 34334736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Web-based proactive system to improve breast cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial.
    Chaudhry R; Scheitel SM; McMurtry EK; Leutink DJ; Cabanela RL; Naessens JM; Rahman AS; Davis LA; Stroebel RJ
    Arch Intern Med; 2007 Mar; 167(6):606-11. PubMed ID: 17389293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electronic mail was not better than postal mail for surveying residents and faculty.
    Akl EA; Maroun N; Klocke RA; Montori V; Schünemann HJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Apr; 58(4):425-9. PubMed ID: 15862729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.