These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17238571)

  • 1. E-health interventions as complex interventions: improving the quality of methods of assessment.
    Holbrook AM; Thabane L; Shcherbatykh IY; O'Reilly D
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2006; 2006():952. PubMed ID: 17238571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Implementation fidelity: a framework for evaluation in the health information technology field.
    Eisenstein EL; Lobach DF; Montgomery P; Kawamoto K; Anstrom KJ
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2007 Oct; ():949. PubMed ID: 18694049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using Mixed Methods in Health Information Technology Evaluation.
    Sockolow P; Dowding D; Randell R; Favela J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 225():83-7. PubMed ID: 27332167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The evaluation of telemedicine and health services research.
    Grigsby J; Brega AG; Devore PA
    Telemed J E Health; 2005 Jun; 11(3):317-28. PubMed ID: 16035929
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A new forum for health services research in critical care medicine.
    Landry MD; Rizoli M
    J Crit Care; 2001 Dec; 16(4):136-41. PubMed ID: 11815898
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Health Technology Assessment-disease management instrument reliably measured methodologic quality of health technology assessments of disease management.
    Steuten LM; Vrijhoef HJ; van Merode GG; Severens JL; Spreeuwenberg C
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Sep; 57(9):881-8. PubMed ID: 15504631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Economic evaluation in medical information technology: why the numbers don't add up.
    Eisenstein EL; Ortiz M; Anstrom KJ; Crosslin DR; Lobach DF
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2006; 2006():914. PubMed ID: 17238533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of health information systems-problems and challenges.
    Ammenwerth E; Gräber S; Herrmann G; Bürkle T; König J
    Int J Med Inform; 2003 Sep; 71(2-3):125-35. PubMed ID: 14519405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of Health Information Technology - Key Elements in the Framework.
    Lee TT
    J Nurs Res; 2016 Dec; 24(4):283-285. PubMed ID: 27846099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Evaluation Imperative.
    Nagle LM
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 225():88-92. PubMed ID: 27332168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing the quality of medical information technology economic evaluations: room for improvement.
    Eisenstein EL; Ortiz M; Anstrom KJ; Crosslin DR; Lobach DF
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2006; 2006():234-8. PubMed ID: 17238338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of health information technology: which questions for which systems? Proposal for a taxonomy.
    Grémy F; Degoulet P
    Med Inform (Lond); 1993; 18(3):185-93. PubMed ID: 8289530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating the impact of information communication technologies on complex organizational systems: a multi-disciplinary, multi-method framework.
    Westbrook JI; Braithwaite J; Iedema R; Coiera EW
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 2):1323-7. PubMed ID: 15361029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An inventory of evaluation studies of information technology in health care: trends in evaluation research 1982-2002.
    Ammenwerth E; de Keizer N
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 2):1289-94. PubMed ID: 15361022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Alberta Hip and Knee Replacement Project: a model for health technology assessment based on comparative effectiveness of clinical pathways.
    Gooch KL; Smith D; Wasylak T; Faris PD; Marshall DA; Khong H; Hibbert JE; Parker RD; Zernicke RF; Beaupre L; Pearce T; Johnston DW; Frank CB
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Apr; 25(2):113-23. PubMed ID: 19366494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation frameworks for nursing informatics.
    Currie LM
    Int J Med Inform; 2005 Dec; 74(11-12):908-16. PubMed ID: 16099711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Insights and limits of usability evaluation methods along the health information technology lifecycle.
    Marcilly R; Kushniruk AW; Beuscart-Zephir MC; Borycki EM
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 210():115-9. PubMed ID: 25991113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A methodological framework for evaluating mobile health devices.
    Kaufman DR; Starren JB
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2006; 2006():978. PubMed ID: 17238597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How to measure technology assessment: an introduction.
    Hasman A
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2014; 202():1-4. PubMed ID: 25000000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The PHM-Ethics methodology: interdisciplinary technology assessment of personal health monitoring.
    Schmidt S; Verweij M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 187():13-20. PubMed ID: 23920452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.