These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17239188)

  • 1. The Near Mallett Unit Foveal Suppression Test: a cross-sectional study to establish test norms and relationship with other optometric tests.
    Tang ST; Evans BJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 Jan; 27(1):31-43. PubMed ID: 17239188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Mallett Fixation Disparity Test: influence of test instructions and relationship with symptoms.
    Karania R; Evans BJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2006 Sep; 26(5):507-22. PubMed ID: 16918777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fixation disparity and near visual acuity.
    Jenkins TC; Abd-Manan F; Pardhan S
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1995 Jan; 15(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 7724221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Distance and near readings of associated heterophoria taken on 500 patients.
    Pickwell LD; Kaye NA; Jenkins TC
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1991 Oct; 11(4):291-6. PubMed ID: 1771065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The development of crowding and interocular interactions in a resolution acuity task.
    Masgoret X; Asper L; Alexander J; Suttle C
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Dec; 52(13):9452-6. PubMed ID: 22058333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does an iPad fixation disparity test give equivalent results to the Mallett near fixation disparity test?
    Parmar KR; Dickinson C; Evans BJW
    J Optom; 2019; 12(4):222-231. PubMed ID: 31501055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Double-masked randomised placebo-controlled trial of the effect of prismatic corrections on rate of reading and the relationship with symptoms.
    O'Leary CI; Evans BJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2006 Nov; 26(6):555-65. PubMed ID: 17040419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Testing distance stereoacuity with the Frisby-Davis 2 (FD2) test.
    Holmes JM; Fawcett SL
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Jan; 139(1):193-5. PubMed ID: 15652852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of associated heterophoria measurements using the Mallett test for near vision and the Sheedy Disparometer.
    Pickwell LD; Gilchrist JM; Hesler J
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1988; 8(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 3419825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is the aligning prism measured with the Mallett unit correlated with fusional vergence reserves?
    Conway ML; Thomas J; Subramanian A
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(8):e42832. PubMed ID: 22905174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Statistical normal values of visual parameters that characterize binocular function in children.
    Jiménez R; Pérez MA; García JA; González MD
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2004 Nov; 24(6):528-42. PubMed ID: 15491481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Habitual vs optimal distance visual acuity.
    Pointer JS
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Sep; 28(5):457-66. PubMed ID: 18761483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Objective vs subjective measurements of dark vergence.
    Jaschinski W; Jainta S; Hoormann J; Walper N
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 Jan; 27(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 17239194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is there a need for binocular vision evaluation in low vision?
    Rundström MM; Eperjesi F
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1995 Sep; 15(5):525-8. PubMed ID: 8524587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using a dichoptic moving window presentation technique to investigate binocular advantages during reading.
    Nikolova M; Jainta S; Blythe HI; Liversedge SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Feb; 43(2):265-280. PubMed ID: 27819454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Do prism corrections according to H.-J. Haase affect ocular prevalence?].
    Schroth V; Jaschinski W
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2007 Jan; 224(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 17260317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The prism that aligns fixation disparity does not predict the self-selected prism.
    Otto JM; Bach M; Kommerell G
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Nov; 28(6):550-7. PubMed ID: 19076557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of selected variables on monocular, interocular, and binocular visual acuity.
    Pointer JS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Feb; 85(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 18296931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Pattern Glare Test: a review and determination of normative values.
    Evans BJ; Stevenson SJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Jul; 28(4):295-309. PubMed ID: 18565084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Binocular contrast sensitivity testing for low vision patients.
    Eldred KB; Jose RT
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1991 Oct; 62(10):766-9. PubMed ID: 1813502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.