These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

402 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17239619)

  • 1. Analysis of a large fMRI cohort: Statistical and methodological issues for group analyses.
    Thirion B; Pinel P; Mériaux S; Roche A; Dehaene S; Poline JB
    Neuroimage; 2007 Mar; 35(1):105-20. PubMed ID: 17239619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of spatial smoothing on fMRI group inferences.
    Mikl M; Marecek R; Hlustík P; Pavlicová M; Drastich A; Chlebus P; Brázdil M; Krupa P
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 May; 26(4):490-503. PubMed ID: 18060720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation and optimization of fMRI single-subject processing pipelines with NPAIRS and second-level CVA.
    Zhang J; Anderson JR; Liang L; Pulapura SK; Gatewood L; Rottenberg DA; Strother SC
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Feb; 27(2):264-78. PubMed ID: 18849131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A method for generating reproducible evidence in fMRI studies.
    Liou M; Su HR; Lee JD; Aston JA; Tsai AC; Cheng PE
    Neuroimage; 2006 Jan; 29(2):383-95. PubMed ID: 16226893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mixed-effects and fMRI studies.
    Friston KJ; Stephan KE; Lund TE; Morcom A; Kiebel S
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jan; 24(1):244-52. PubMed ID: 15588616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Structural analysis of fMRI data revisited: improving the sensitivity and reliability of fMRI group studies.
    Thirion B; Pinel P; Tucholka A; Roche A; Ciuciu P; Mangin JF; Poline JB
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Sep; 26(9):1256-69. PubMed ID: 17896597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Test-retest reliability of fMRI activation during prosaccades and antisaccades.
    Raemaekers M; Vink M; Zandbelt B; van Wezel RJ; Kahn RS; Ramsey NF
    Neuroimage; 2007 Jul; 36(3):532-42. PubMed ID: 17499525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Detecting activations in PET and fMRI: levels of inference and power.
    Friston KJ; Holmes A; Poline JB; Price CJ; Frith CD
    Neuroimage; 1996 Dec; 4(3 Pt 1):223-35. PubMed ID: 9345513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comment on the severity of the effects of non-white noise in fMRI time-series.
    Smith AT; Singh KD; Balsters JH
    Neuroimage; 2007 Jun; 36(2):282-8. PubMed ID: 17098446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Voxel-based homogeneity probability maps of gray matter in groups: assessing the reliability of functional effects.
    Momenan R; Rawlings R; Fong G; Knutson B; Hommer D
    Neuroimage; 2004 Mar; 21(3):965-72. PubMed ID: 15006663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Classical and Bayesian inference in neuroimaging: applications.
    Friston KJ; Glaser DE; Henson RN; Kiebel S; Phillips C; Ashburner J
    Neuroimage; 2002 Jun; 16(2):484-512. PubMed ID: 12030833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spatial registration of multichannel multi-subject fNIRS data to MNI space without MRI.
    Singh AK; Okamoto M; Dan H; Jurcak V; Dan I
    Neuroimage; 2005 Oct; 27(4):842-51. PubMed ID: 15979346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Non-normality and transformations of random fields, with an application to voxel-based morphometry.
    Viviani R; Beschoner P; Ehrhard K; Schmitz B; Thöne J
    Neuroimage; 2007 Mar; 35(1):121-30. PubMed ID: 17222566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An evaluation of thresholding techniques in fMRI analysis.
    Logan BR; Rowe DB
    Neuroimage; 2004 May; 22(1):95-108. PubMed ID: 15110000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantifying inter-subject agreement in brain-imaging analyses.
    Wong DK; Grosenick L; Uy ET; Perreau Guimaraes M; Carvalhaes CG; Desain P; Suppes P
    Neuroimage; 2008 Feb; 39(3):1051-63. PubMed ID: 18023210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analyzing fMRI experiments with structural adaptive smoothing procedures.
    Tabelow K; Polzehl J; Voss HU; Spokoiny V
    Neuroimage; 2006 Oct; 33(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 16891126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Within-subject variation in BOLD-fMRI signal changes across repeated measurements: quantification and implications for sample size.
    Zandbelt BB; Gladwin TE; Raemaekers M; van Buuren M; Neggers SF; Kahn RS; Ramsey NF; Vink M
    Neuroimage; 2008 Aug; 42(1):196-206. PubMed ID: 18538585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An empirical comparison of surface-based and volume-based group studies in neuroimaging.
    Tucholka A; Fritsch V; Poline JB; Thirion B
    Neuroimage; 2012 Nov; 63(3):1443-53. PubMed ID: 22732555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Independent vector analysis (IVA): multivariate approach for fMRI group study.
    Lee JH; Lee TW; Jolesz FA; Yoo SS
    Neuroimage; 2008 Mar; 40(1):86-109. PubMed ID: 18165105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modeling state-related fMRI activity using change-point theory.
    Lindquist MA; Waugh C; Wager TD
    Neuroimage; 2007 Apr; 35(3):1125-41. PubMed ID: 17360198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.