These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17240559)

  • 1. Fake! Part I. By Caveman.
    J Cell Sci; 2006 Dec; 119(Pt 23):4791-2. PubMed ID: 17240559
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Scientific misconduct.
    Sundaram M; Rosenthal DI; Hodler J
    Skeletal Radiol; 2007 Mar; 36(3):179. PubMed ID: 17205322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Control of research ethics standards by the scientific community is not sufficient].
    Persson A
    Lakartidningen; 2007 Aug 8-21; 104(32-33):2244-7. PubMed ID: 17822203
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Pillory after scientific fraud--will it help?].
    Blaas HG; Salvesen KA; Eik-Nes SH
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Nov; 126(22):2982-3. PubMed ID: 17117200
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [This is not our medical ethic].
    Harboe M
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Sep; 126(17):2283. PubMed ID: 16967071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Gillberg's research must tolerate scrutiny].
    Brante T
    Lakartidningen; 2003 Feb; 100(9):736-7. PubMed ID: 12674566
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Journals should set a new standard in transparency.
    Dellavalle RP; Lundahl K; Freeman SR; Schilling LM
    Nature; 2007 Jan; 445(7126):364. PubMed ID: 17251958
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fake bird fossil highlights the problem of illegal trading.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 2000 Apr; 404(6779):696. PubMed ID: 10783860
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Scientific misconduct.
    Balaji SM
    Indian J Dent Res; 2015; 26(1):1. PubMed ID: 25961605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Peer review and scientific misconduct: bad authors and trusting reviewers.
    Malay DS
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2009; 48(3):283-4. PubMed ID: 19423027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Does the Scientific Committee have power to suppress scientific misconduct?].
    Josephson S
    Lakartidningen; 2003 Oct; 100(42):3350-1. PubMed ID: 14619052
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Research misconduct? What misconduct?
    Kondro W; Hebert PC
    CMAJ; 2007 Mar; 176(7):905, 907. PubMed ID: 17389430
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Publication ethics.
    Hays JC
    Public Health Nurs; 2009; 26(3):205-6. PubMed ID: 19386055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Peer review of research institutions. Evaluation or facilitation].
    Almind G
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2003 Jan; 165(4):327-9. PubMed ID: 12599794
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Peer review: the best of the blemished?
    Alpert JS
    Am J Med; 2007 Apr; 120(4):287-8. PubMed ID: 17398217
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A statement on ethics from the HEART group.
    HEART Group
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 May; 71(6):859-61. PubMed ID: 18412086
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [When the editor makes an error].
    Hem E
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2008 Oct; 128(20):2303. PubMed ID: 19096482
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Statement on Ethics From the HEART Group.
    HEART Group
    Circ Res; 2008 May; 102(9):e104-5. PubMed ID: 18467635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The response to an allegation of scientific misconduct in the Bucci et al. article on DIMP exposure in mink.
    Calonge N
    Reprod Toxicol; 2006 Oct; 22(3):553; author reply 555. PubMed ID: 16677800
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Research ethics on the pensum list].
    Haug C
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2008 May; 128(10):1161. PubMed ID: 18480861
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.