These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17240796)

  • 1. Can we reduce the incidence of multiple pregnancy following ART?
    Dastidar SG
    J Indian Med Assoc; 2006 Aug; 104(8):422. PubMed ID: 17240796
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Multiple pregnancies after ART: problems and possible solutions].
    Shebl O; Ebner T; Sommergruber M; Sir A; Urdl W; Tews G
    Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 2007; 47(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 17272931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Addressing the growing problem of multiple gestations created by assisted reproductive therapies.
    Nakhuda GS; Sauer MV
    Semin Perinatol; 2005 Oct; 29(5):355-62. PubMed ID: 16360495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. ART: iatrogenic multiple pregnancy?
    Verberg MF; Macklon NS; Heijnen EM; Fauser BC
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Feb; 21(1):129-43. PubMed ID: 17074535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multiple pregnancies: a plea for informed caution.
    Barri PN
    Hum Reprod Update; 2005; 11(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 15618292
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multiple births from assisted reproductive technologies: a challenge that must be met.
    Adamson D; Baker V
    Fertil Steril; 2004 Mar; 81(3):517-22, discussion 526. PubMed ID: 15037394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multifetal pregnancy reduction in assisted reproductive technologies: a license to kill?
    Khanijou S
    DePaul J Health Care Law; 2005; 8(2):403-30. PubMed ID: 16538758
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The relative contribution of assisted reproductive technologies and ovulation induction to multiple births in the United States 5 years after the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology/American Society for Reproductive Medicine recommendation to limit the number of embryos transferred.
    Dickey RP
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Dec; 88(6):1554-61. PubMed ID: 17481621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Epidemic of plurality and contributions of assisted reproductive technology therein.
    Kapoor M; Pal L
    Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet; 2009 May; 151C(2):128-35. PubMed ID: 19378330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Low tolerance for complications.
    Donoso P; Devroey P
    Fertil Steril; 2013 Aug; 100(2):299-301. PubMed ID: 23806852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assisted conception. III--problems with assisted conception.
    Braude P; Rowell P
    BMJ; 2003 Oct; 327(7420):920-3. PubMed ID: 14563758
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assisted reproductive technologies and the pitfalls of unregulated biomedical innovation.
    Noah L
    Fla Law Rev; 2003 Apr; 55(2):603-65. PubMed ID: 15212032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Infertility and the desire for multiple births.
    D'Alton M
    Fertil Steril; 2004 Mar; 81(3):523-5, discussion 526. PubMed ID: 15037395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of legislation on outcomes of assisted reproduction technology: lessons from the 2004 Italian law.
    La Sala GB; Villani MT; Nicoli A; Valli B; Iannotti F; Blickstein I
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Apr; 89(4):854-9. PubMed ID: 17681340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2003 results from the Canadian ART Register.
    Gunby J; Daya S;
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Sep; 88(3):550-9. PubMed ID: 17303133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Against the obligation of single embryo transfer].
    Merviel P; Lourdel E; Cabry R; Grenier N; Sanguinet P; Henry I; Brasseur F; Copin H
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2007 May; 35(5):474-9. PubMed ID: 17398139
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assisted reproductive technology practice patterns and the impact of embryo transfer guidelines in the United States.
    Stern JE; Cedars MI; Jain T; Klein NA; Beaird CM; Grainger DA; Gibbons WE;
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Aug; 88(2):275-82. PubMed ID: 17445805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Parental imprinting related to Assisted Reproductive Technologies].
    Fauque P; Jouannet P; Jammes H
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2008 Nov; 36(11):1139-46. PubMed ID: 18922729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Infertility, assisted reproductive technology, and adverse pregnancy outcomes: executive summary of a National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop.
    Reddy UM; Wapner RJ; Rebar RW; Tasca RJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Apr; 109(4):967-77. PubMed ID: 17400861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assisted reproductive technology (ART) in the upstate: reducing the risks of multiple births.
    Miller PB; Forstein DA; Usadi RS; Lessey BA; Higdon HL; Boone WR
    J S C Med Assoc; 2005 Dec; 101(11):373-7. PubMed ID: 16711617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.