These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17241136)

  • 1. Resisting recently acted-on cues: compatibility of Go/NoGo responses to response history modulates (frontal P3) event-related potentials.
    Freitas AL; Azizian A; Leung HC; Squires NK
    Psychophysiology; 2007 Jan; 44(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 17241136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Response priming in the Go/NoGo task: the N2 reflects neither inhibition nor conflict.
    Smith JL; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Feb; 118(2):343-55. PubMed ID: 17140848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative analysis of event-related potentials during Go/NoGo and CPT: decomposition of electrophysiological markers of response inhibition and sustained attention.
    Kirmizi-Alsan E; Bayraktaroglu Z; Gurvit H; Keskin YH; Emre M; Demiralp T
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1104(1):114-28. PubMed ID: 16824492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of pre-stimulus processing on subsequent events in a warned Go/NoGo paradigm: response preparation, execution and inhibition.
    Smith JL; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Aug; 61(2):121-33. PubMed ID: 16214250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of stimulus-response compatibility in mediating expert performance in baseball players.
    Nakamoto H; Mori S
    Brain Res; 2008 Jan; 1189():179-88. PubMed ID: 18048011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neurophysiological markers of alert responding during goal-directed behavior: a high-density electrical mapping study.
    Dockree PM; Kelly SP; Robertson IH; Reilly RB; Foxe JJ
    Neuroimage; 2005 Sep; 27(3):587-601. PubMed ID: 16024257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. When 'go' and 'nogo' are equally frequent: ERP components and cortical tomography.
    Lavric A; Pizzagalli DA; Forstmeier S
    Eur J Neurosci; 2004 Nov; 20(9):2483-8. PubMed ID: 15525290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A study on the neural mechanism of inhibition of return by the event-related potential in the Go/NoGo task.
    Tian Y; Yao D
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Oct; 79(2):171-8. PubMed ID: 18524452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Event-related potentials for response inhibition in Parkinson's disease.
    Bokura H; Yamaguchi S; Kobayashi S
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(6):967-75. PubMed ID: 15716167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Isolating event-related potential components associated with voluntary control of visuo-spatial attention.
    McDonald JJ; Green JJ
    Brain Res; 2008 Aug; 1227():96-109. PubMed ID: 18621037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. N2 event-related potential correlates of response inhibition in an auditory Go/Nogo task.
    Kaiser S; Weiss O; Hill H; Markela-Lerenc J; Kiefer M; Weisbrod M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Aug; 61(2):279-82. PubMed ID: 16298004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Source analysis of the N2 in a cued Go/NoGo task.
    Bekker EM; Kenemans JL; Verbaten MN
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Feb; 22(2):221-31. PubMed ID: 15653295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Age-related differences in processing irrelevant information: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Vallesi A; Stuss DT; McIntosh AR; Picton TW
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jan; 47(2):577-86. PubMed ID: 19022270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Conflict and inhibition in the cued-Go/NoGo task.
    Randall WM; Smith JL
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2011 Dec; 122(12):2400-7. PubMed ID: 21715225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of cue information on response production and inhibition measured by event-related potentials.
    Géczy I; Czigler I; Balázs L
    Acta Physiol Hung; 1999; 86(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 10755168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Task switching and novelty processing activate a common neural network for cognitive control.
    Barcelo F; Escera C; Corral MJ; Periáñez JA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Oct; 18(10):1734-48. PubMed ID: 17014377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Emotional context modulates response inhibition: neural and behavioral data.
    Albert J; López-Martín S; Carretié L
    Neuroimage; 2010 Jan; 49(1):914-21. PubMed ID: 19716425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of characteristics of target cues on task interference from prospective memory.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Jackson T; Yang H
    Neuroreport; 2009 Jan; 20(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 18978643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Juicy fruit and creepy crawlies: an electrophysiological study of the implicit Go/NoGo association task.
    Banfield JF; van der Lugt AH; Münte TF
    Neuroimage; 2006 Jul; 31(4):1841-9. PubMed ID: 16581266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Anxiety, cognitive self-evaluation and performance: ERP correlates.
    Righi S; Mecacci L; Viggiano MP
    J Anxiety Disord; 2009 Dec; 23(8):1132-8. PubMed ID: 19695828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.