These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17242694)

  • 1. Cost-effectiveness analysis of cetuximab/irinotecan vs active/best supportive care for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer patients who have failed previous chemotherapy treatment.
    Starling N; Tilden D; White J; Cunningham D
    Br J Cancer; 2007 Jan; 96(2):206-12. PubMed ID: 17242694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Systematic review and economic evaluation of bevacizumab and cetuximab for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Tappenden P; Jones R; Paisley S; Carroll C
    Health Technol Assess; 2007 Mar; 11(12):1-128, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 17346499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of irinotecan, oxaliplatin and raltitrexed for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: systematic review and economic evaluation.
    Hind D; Tappenden P; Tumur I; Eggington S; Sutcliffe P; Ryan A
    Health Technol Assess; 2008 May; 12(15):iii-ix, xi-162. PubMed ID: 18462574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cetuximab (mono- or combination chemotherapy), bevacizumab (combination with non-oxaliplatin chemotherapy) and panitumumab (monotherapy) for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer after first-line chemotherapy (review of technology appraisal No.150 and part review of technology appraisal No. 118): a systematic review and economic model.
    Hoyle M; Crathorne L; Peters J; Jones-Hughes T; Cooper C; Napier M; Tappenden P; Hyde C
    Health Technol Assess; 2013 Apr; 17(14):1-237. PubMed ID: 23547747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost-effectiveness of cetuximab, cetuximab plus irinotecan, and panitumumab for third and further lines of treatment for KRAS wild-type patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Hoyle M; Peters J; Crathorne L; Jones-Hughes T; Cooper C; Napier M; Hyde C
    Value Health; 2013; 16(2):288-96. PubMed ID: 23538180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prospective cost-effectiveness analysis of cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer: evaluation of National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group CO.17 trial.
    Mittmann N; Au HJ; Tu D; O'Callaghan CJ; Isogai PK; Karapetis CS; Zalcberg JR; Evans WK; Moore MJ; Siddiqui J; Findlay B; Colwell B; Simes J; Gibbs P; Links M; Tebbutt NC; Jonker DJ; ;
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Sep; 101(17):1182-92. PubMed ID: 19666851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost-effectiveness of targeted therapy with cetuximab in patients with K-ras wild-type colorectal cancer presenting with initially unresectable metastases limited to the liver in a German setting.
    Asseburg C; Frank M; Köhne CH; Hartmann JT; Griebsch I; Mohr A; Osowski U; Schulten J; Mittendorf T
    Clin Ther; 2011 Apr; 33(4):482-97. PubMed ID: 21635994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost-effectiveness of cetuximab in combination with irinotecan compared with current care in metastatic colorectal cancer after failure on irinotecan--a Belgian analysis.
    Annemans L; Van Cutsem E; Humblet Y; Van Laethem JL; Bleiberg H
    Acta Clin Belg; 2007; 62(6):419-25. PubMed ID: 18351186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the Cost-effectiveness of Doublet Therapy in Metastatic BRAF Variant Colorectal Cancer.
    Patel KK; Stein S; Lacy J; O'Hara M; Huntington SF
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Jan; 4(1):e2033441. PubMed ID: 33433598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cetuximab (review of technology appraisal no. 176) and panitumumab (partial review of technology appraisal no. 240) for previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
    Huxley N; Crathorne L; Varley-Campbell J; Tikhonova I; Snowsill T; Briscoe S; Peters J; Bond M; Napier M; Hoyle M
    Health Technol Assess; 2017 Jun; 21(38):1-294. PubMed ID: 28682222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cetuximab monotherapy and cetuximab plus irinotecan in irinotecan-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Cunningham D; Humblet Y; Siena S; Khayat D; Bleiberg H; Santoro A; Bets D; Mueser M; Harstrick A; Verslype C; Chau I; Van Cutsem E
    N Engl J Med; 2004 Jul; 351(4):337-45. PubMed ID: 15269313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Irinotecan in second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: improved survival and cost-effect compared with infusional 5-FU.
    Iveson TJ; Hickish T; Schmitt C; Van Cutsem E
    Eur J Cancer; 1999 Dec; 35(13):1796-804. PubMed ID: 10673994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cetuximab in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: a model-based cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Norum J
    J Chemother; 2006 Oct; 18(5):532-7. PubMed ID: 17127231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Randomized phase II trial of cetuximab, bevacizumab, and irinotecan compared with cetuximab and bevacizumab alone in irinotecan-refractory colorectal cancer: the BOND-2 study.
    Saltz LB; Lenz HJ; Kindler HL; Hochster HS; Wadler S; Hoff PM; Kemeny NE; Hollywood EM; Gonen M; Quinones M; Morse M; Chen HX
    J Clin Oncol; 2007 Oct; 25(29):4557-61. PubMed ID: 17876013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. EPIC: phase III trial of cetuximab plus irinotecan after fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin failure in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Sobrero AF; Maurel J; Fehrenbacher L; Scheithauer W; Abubakr YA; Lutz MP; Vega-Villegas ME; Eng C; Steinhauer EU; Prausova J; Lenz HJ; Borg C; Middleton G; Kröning H; Luppi G; Kisker O; Zubel A; Langer C; Kopit J; Burris HA
    J Clin Oncol; 2008 May; 26(14):2311-9. PubMed ID: 18390971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cetuximab for the treatment of recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.
    Greenhalgh J; Bagust A; Boland A; Fleeman N; McLeod C; Dundar Y; Proudlove C; Shaw R
    Health Technol Assess; 2009 Oct; 13 Suppl 3():49-54. PubMed ID: 19846029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sensitivity to previous irinotecan treatment does not predict the efficacy of combination chemotherapy with cetuximab plus irinotecan for wild-type KRAS metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Shitara K; Ura T; Matsuo K; Takahari D; Yokota T; Yuki S; Yoshida M; Utsunomiya S; Sato Y; Yamaura H; Kato M; Inaba Y; Tajika M; Kawai H; Yamazaki K; Komatsu Y; Muro K
    Eur J Cancer; 2011 Dec; 47(18):2673-80. PubMed ID: 21652203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Chemotherapy of metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Prescrire Int; 2010 Oct; 19(109):219-24. PubMed ID: 21180382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cost-effectiveness of KRAS testing in metastatic colorectal cancer patients in the United States and Germany.
    Vijayaraghavan A; Efrusy MB; Göke B; Kirchner T; Santas CC; Goldberg RM
    Int J Cancer; 2012 Jul; 131(2):438-45. PubMed ID: 21898389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.