219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17243158)
1. A pair-to-pair amino acids substitution matrix and its applications for protein structure prediction.
Eyal E; Frenkel-Morgenstern M; Sobolev V; Pietrokovski S
Proteins; 2007 Apr; 67(1):142-53. PubMed ID: 17243158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. How well can we predict native contacts in proteins based on decoy structures and their energies?
Zhu J; Zhu Q; Shi Y; Liu H
Proteins; 2003 Sep; 52(4):598-608. PubMed ID: 12910459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Combining evolutionary and structural information for local protein structure prediction.
Pei J; Grishin NV
Proteins; 2004 Sep; 56(4):782-94. PubMed ID: 15281130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Analysis of covariation in an SH3 domain sequence alignment: applications in tertiary contact prediction and the design of compensating hydrophobic core substitutions.
Larson SM; Di Nardo AA; Davidson AR
J Mol Biol; 2000 Oct; 303(3):433-46. PubMed ID: 11031119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficient identification of near-native conformations in ab initio protein structure prediction using structural profiles.
Wolff K; Vendruscolo M; Porto M
Proteins; 2010 Feb; 78(2):249-58. PubMed ID: 19701942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prediction of distant residue contacts with the use of evolutionary information.
Vicatos S; Reddy BV; Kaznessis Y
Proteins; 2005 Mar; 58(4):935-49. PubMed ID: 15645442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Potential for assessing quality of protein structure based on contact number prediction.
Ishida T; Nakamura S; Shimizu K
Proteins; 2006 Sep; 64(4):940-7. PubMed ID: 16788993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. FUGUE: sequence-structure homology recognition using environment-specific substitution tables and structure-dependent gap penalties.
Shi J; Blundell TL; Mizuguchi K
J Mol Biol; 2001 Jun; 310(1):243-57. PubMed ID: 11419950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Characterizing conserved structural contacts by pair-wise relative contacts and relative packing groups.
Holmes JB; Tsai J
J Mol Biol; 2005 Dec; 354(3):706-21. PubMed ID: 16269154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A method for protein accessibility prediction based on residue types and conformational states.
Zarei R; Arab S; Sadeghi M
Comput Biol Chem; 2007 Oct; 31(5-6):384-8. PubMed ID: 17888743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fold assembly of small proteins using monte carlo simulations driven by restraints derived from multiple sequence alignments.
Ortiz AR; Kolinski A; Skolnick J
J Mol Biol; 1998 Mar; 277(2):419-48. PubMed ID: 9514747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Correlated substitution analysis and the prediction of amino acid structural contacts.
Horner DS; Pirovano W; Pesole G
Brief Bioinform; 2008 Jan; 9(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 18000015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Combination of scoring functions improves discrimination in protein-protein docking.
Murphy J; Gatchell DW; Prasad JC; Vajda S
Proteins; 2003 Dec; 53(4):840-54. PubMed ID: 14635126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A simple and fast approach to prediction of protein secondary structure from multiply aligned sequences with accuracy above 70%.
Mehta PK; Heringa J; Argos P
Protein Sci; 1995 Dec; 4(12):2517-25. PubMed ID: 8580842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A reduced protein model with accurate native-structure identification ability.
Betancourt MR
Proteins; 2003 Dec; 53(4):889-907. PubMed ID: 14635131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An introduction to protein contact prediction.
Hamilton N; Huber T
Methods Mol Biol; 2008; 453():87-104. PubMed ID: 18712298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predicting interresidue contacts using templates and pathways.
Shao Y; Bystroff C
Proteins; 2003; 53 Suppl 6():497-502. PubMed ID: 14579339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prediction of deleterious functional effects of amino acid mutations using a library of structure-based function descriptors.
Herrgard S; Cammer SA; Hoffman BT; Knutson S; Gallina M; Speir JA; Fetrow JS; Baxter SM
Proteins; 2003 Dec; 53(4):806-16. PubMed ID: 14635123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Identifying protein-protein interfacial residues in heterocomplexes using residue conservation scores.
Li JJ; Huang DS; Wang B; Chen P
Int J Biol Macromol; 2006 May; 38(3-5):241-7. PubMed ID: 16600360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Efficient comprehensive scoring of docked protein complexes using probabilistic support vector machines.
Martin O; Schomburg D
Proteins; 2008 Mar; 70(4):1367-78. PubMed ID: 17894343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
