109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17243180)
1. A protein-specifically adapted scoring function for the reranking of docking solutions.
Müller W; Sticht H
Proteins; 2007 Apr; 67(1):98-111. PubMed ID: 17243180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Complex-type-dependent scoring functions in protein-protein docking.
Li CH; Ma XH; Shen LZ; Chang S; Chen WZ; Wang CX
Biophys Chem; 2007 Aug; 129(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 17540496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Refinement of unbound protein docking studies using biological knowledge.
Heuser P; Baù D; Benkert P; Schomburg D
Proteins; 2005 Dec; 61(4):1059-67. PubMed ID: 16208723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of protein docking predictions using Hex 3.1 in CAPRI rounds 1 and 2.
Ritchie DW
Proteins; 2003 Jul; 52(1):98-106. PubMed ID: 12784374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. DrugScore(CSD)-knowledge-based scoring function derived from small molecule crystal data with superior recognition rate of near-native ligand poses and better affinity prediction.
Velec HF; Gohlke H; Klebe G
J Med Chem; 2005 Oct; 48(20):6296-303. PubMed ID: 16190756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. pyDock: electrostatics and desolvation for effective scoring of rigid-body protein-protein docking.
Cheng TM; Blundell TL; Fernandez-Recio J
Proteins; 2007 Aug; 68(2):503-15. PubMed ID: 17444519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of blind predictions of protein-protein interactions: current status of docking methods.
Méndez R; Leplae R; De Maria L; Wodak SJ
Proteins; 2003 Jul; 52(1):51-67. PubMed ID: 12784368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Complementarity of hydrophobic properties in ATP-protein binding: a new criterion to rank docking solutions.
Pyrkov TV; Kosinsky YA; Arseniev AS; Priestle JP; Jacoby E; Efremov RG
Proteins; 2007 Feb; 66(2):388-98. PubMed ID: 17094116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Steering protein-ligand docking with quantitative NMR chemical shift perturbations.
González-Ruiz D; Gohlke H
J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Oct; 49(10):2260-71. PubMed ID: 19795907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predicting protein complex geometries with a neural network.
Chae MH; Krull F; Lorenzen S; Knapp EW
Proteins; 2010 Mar; 78(4):1026-39. PubMed ID: 19938153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A novel shape complementarity scoring function for protein-protein docking.
Chen R; Weng Z
Proteins; 2003 May; 51(3):397-408. PubMed ID: 12696051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Automated docking of ligands to antibodies: methods and applications.
Sotriffer CA; Flader W; Winger RH; Rode BM; Liedl KR; Varga JM
Methods; 2000 Mar; 20(3):280-91. PubMed ID: 10694451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Maximum common binding modes (MCBM): consensus docking scoring using multiple ligand information and interaction fingerprints.
Renner S; Derksen S; Radestock S; Mörchen F
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Feb; 48(2):319-32. PubMed ID: 18211051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. HADDOCK: a protein-protein docking approach based on biochemical or biophysical information.
Dominguez C; Boelens R; Bonvin AM
J Am Chem Soc; 2003 Feb; 125(7):1731-7. PubMed ID: 12580598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How different from random are docking predictions when ranked by scoring functions?
Feliu E; Oliva B
Proteins; 2010 Dec; 78(16):3376-85. PubMed ID: 20848549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Structural artifacts in protein-ligand X-ray structures: implications for the development of docking scoring functions.
Søndergaard CR; Garrett AE; Carstensen T; Pollastri G; Nielsen JE
J Med Chem; 2009 Sep; 52(18):5673-84. PubMed ID: 19711919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimizing the signal-to-noise ratio of scoring functions for protein--ligand docking.
Seifert MH
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Mar; 48(3):602-12. PubMed ID: 18293951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Docking and scoring protein complexes: CAPRI 3rd Edition.
Lensink MF; Méndez R; Wodak SJ
Proteins; 2007 Dec; 69(4):704-18. PubMed ID: 17918726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative assessment of scoring functions on a diverse test set.
Cheng T; Li X; Li Y; Liu Z; Wang R
J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Apr; 49(4):1079-93. PubMed ID: 19358517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A flexible approach to induced fit docking.
Nabuurs SB; Wagener M; de Vlieg J
J Med Chem; 2007 Dec; 50(26):6507-18. PubMed ID: 18031000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
