These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17243595)

  • 21. Marginal microleakage of a sealant applied to permanent enamel: evaluation of 3 application protocols.
    Asselin ME; Fortin D; Sitbon Y; Rompré PH
    Pediatr Dent; 2008; 30(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 18402096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Shear bond strength of composite bonded with three adhesives to Er,Cr:YSGG laser-prepared enamel.
    Türkmen C; Sazak-Oveçoğlu H; Günday M; Güngör G; Durkan M; Oksüz M
    Quintessence Int; 2010 Jun; 41(6):e119-24. PubMed ID: 20490385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Use of one-bottle adhesive as an intermediate bonding layer to reduce sealant microleakage on saliva-contaminated enamel.
    Hebling J; Feigal RJ
    Am J Dent; 2000 Aug; 13(4):187-91. PubMed ID: 11763928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An in vitro comparison of microleakage of two self-etched adhesive and the one-bottle adhesive used in pit and fissure sealant with or without saliva contamination.
    Bassir L; Khanehmasjedi M; Nasr E; Kaviani A
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(6):806-10. PubMed ID: 23649068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of adhesive agent and fissure morphology on the in vitro microleakage and penetrability of pit and fissure sealants.
    Marks D; Owens BM; Johnson WW
    Quintessence Int; 2009 Oct; 40(9):763-72. PubMed ID: 19862403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Use of a self-etching adhesive on previously etched intact enamel and its effect on sealant microleakage and tag formation.
    Celiberti P; Lussi A
    J Dent; 2005 Feb; 33(2):163-71. PubMed ID: 15683898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. In Vitro Evaluation of Different Protocols for Preventing Microleakage of Fissure Sealants Placed Following Saliva Contamination.
    Şimşek H; Yazıcı AR; Güngör HC
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2020 Aug; 44(4):240-248. PubMed ID: 33167017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Microleakage of different amalgams bonded with dual cure resin cements.
    Lombard R; du Preez IC; Oberholzer TG
    SADJ; 2007 Mar; 62(2):056, 058-61. PubMed ID: 17624174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of different preparation techniques on the microleakage of compomer and resin fissure sealants.
    Eronat N; Bardakçi Y; Sipahi M
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2003; 70(3):250-3. PubMed ID: 14998210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of the influence of three different temperatures on microleakage of two self-etch and one total-etch adhesives.
    Akbarian S; Sharafeddin F; Akbarian G
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 Mar; 16(3):178-82. PubMed ID: 26057914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effect of different enamel surface treatments on the microleakage of fissure sealants.
    Baygin O; Korkmaz FM; Tüzüner T; Tanriver M
    Lasers Med Sci; 2012 Jan; 27(1):153-60. PubMed ID: 21476043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Bond strength of self-etching primers to enamel and dentin of primary teeth.
    Agostini FG; Kaaden C; Powers JM
    Pediatr Dent; 2001; 23(6):481-6. PubMed ID: 11800447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Microleakage and penetration of a hydrophilic sealant and a conventional resin-based sealant as a function of preparation techniques: a laboratory study.
    Khogli AE; Cauwels R; Vercruysse C; Verbeeck R; Martens L
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2013 Jan; 23(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 22276649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Microleakage at sealant/enamel interface of primary teeth: effect of Er:YAG laser ablation of pits and fissures.
    Borsatto MC; Corona SA; Ramos RP; Liporaci JL; Pécora JD; Palma-Dibb RG
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2004; 71(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 15587098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Microleakage and bond strength of sealant to primary enamel comparing air abrasion and acid etch techniques.
    Knobloch LA; Meyer T; Kerby RE; Johnston W
    Pediatr Dent; 2005; 27(6):463-9. PubMed ID: 16532886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effectiveness of pit and fissure sealants bonded with different adhesive systems: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
    Erbas Unverdi G; Atac SA; Cehreli ZC
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Sep; 21(7):2235-2243. PubMed ID: 27900529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Performance of a conventional sealant and a flowable composite on minimally invasive prepared fissures.
    Francescut P; Lussi A
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(5):543-50. PubMed ID: 17024941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Microleakage of a self-adhesive class V composite on primary and permanent dentitions.
    Shafiei L; Mojiri P; Ghahraman Y; Rakhshan V
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 May; 14(3):461-7. PubMed ID: 24171990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. In vitro evaluation of different techniques of enamel preparation for pit and fissure sealing.
    Courson F; Renda AM; Attal JP; Bouter D; Ruse D; Degrange M
    J Adhes Dent; 2003; 5(4):313-21. PubMed ID: 15008338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of radiotherapy on the microleakage of adhesive systems.
    Bulucu B; Avsar A; Demiryürek EO; Yesilyurt C
    J Adhes Dent; 2009 Aug; 11(4):305-9. PubMed ID: 19701512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.