These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17244145)

  • 1. The use of CVD diamond burs for ultraconservative cavity preparations: a report of two cases.
    Carvalho CA; Fagundes TC; Barata TJ; Trava-Airoldi VJ; Navarro MF
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2007; 19(1):19-28; discussion 29. PubMed ID: 17244145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Oscillating procedures in the preparation technic (I)].
    Hugo B
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1999; 109(2):140-60. PubMed ID: 10078043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of tooth preparation on pressure measured in the pulp chamber: a laboratory study.
    Evans CD; Wilson PR
    Int J Prosthodont; 1999; 12(5):439-43. PubMed ID: 10709526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cutting characteristics of dental diamond burs made with CVD technology.
    Lima LM; Motisuki C; dos Santos-Pinto L; dos Santos-Pinto A; Corat EJ
    Braz Oral Res; 2006; 20(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 16878210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ultrasonic versus high-speed cavity preparation: analysis of increases in pulpal temperature and time to complete preparation.
    Vanderlei AD; Borges AL; Cavalcanti BN; Rode SM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Aug; 100(2):107-9. PubMed ID: 18672127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Principles of proximal cavity preparation and finishing with ultrasonic diamond tips.
    Krejci I; Dietschi D; Lutz FU
    Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 1998 Apr; 10(3):295-8; quiz 300. PubMed ID: 9655063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vitro comparison of the cutting efficiency and temperature production of ten different rotary cutting instruments. Part II: electric handpiece and comparison with turbine.
    Ercoli C; Rotella M; Funkenbusch PD; Russell S; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 May; 101(5):319-31. PubMed ID: 19410066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficacy of two methods for restorative materials' removal in primary teeth.
    Bittar DG; Murakami C; Hesse D; Imparato JC; Mendes FM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Sep; 12(5):372-8. PubMed ID: 22269199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of CVDentUS diamond tips for ultrasound in cavity preparation.
    Predebon JC; Flório FM; Basting RT
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Jul; 7(3):50-8. PubMed ID: 16820807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of tooth preparation burs and luting cement types on the marginal fit of extracoronal restorations.
    Ayad MF
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):145-51. PubMed ID: 19054303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of dentin cavity surface finishing on micro-tensile bond strength of adhesives.
    Cardoso MV; Coutinho E; Ermis RB; Poitevin A; Van Landuyt K; De Munck J; Carvalho RC; Van Meerbeek B
    Dent Mater; 2008 Apr; 24(4):492-501. PubMed ID: 17675225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing cutting efficiencies of diamond burs using a high-speed electric handpiece.
    Chung EM; Sung EC; Wu B; Caputo AA
    Gen Dent; 2006; 54(4):254-7. PubMed ID: 16903197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Enamel subsurface damage due to tooth preparation with diamonds.
    Xu HH; Kelly JR; Jahanmir S; Thompson VP; Rekow ED
    J Dent Res; 1997 Oct; 76(10):1698-706. PubMed ID: 9326903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of two ultrasonic cleaning units for deterioration of cutting edges and debris removal on dental burs.
    Villaseñor A; Hill SD; Seale NS
    Pediatr Dent; 1992; 14(5):326-30. PubMed ID: 1338932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing the cutting efficiency of different burs on zirconia substrate.
    Peters OA; Du D; Ho MY; Chu R; Moule A
    Aust Endod J; 2019 Dec; 45(3):289-297. PubMed ID: 30983118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of ultrasonic instruments on the quality of preparation margins and bonding to dentin.
    Ellis R; Bennani V; Purton D; Chandler N; Lowe B
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2012 Aug; 24(4):278-85. PubMed ID: 22863135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ultrasonic chemical vapor deposition-coated tip versus high- and low-speed carbide burs for apicoectomy: time required for resection and scanning electron microscopy analysis of the root-end surfaces.
    Bernardes RA; de Souza Junior JV; Duarte MA; de Moraes IG; Bramante CM
    J Endod; 2009 Feb; 35(2):265-8. PubMed ID: 19166787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative cutting effectiveness of an ultrasonic diamond tip and a high-speed diamond bur.
    Lima LM; Motisuki C; Corat EJ; Santos-Pinto L
    Minerva Stomatol; 2009 Mar; 58(3):93-8. PubMed ID: 19357615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficiency of the polymer bur SmartPrep compared with conventional tungsten carbide bud bur in dentin caries excavation.
    Dammaschke T; Rodenberg TN; Schäfer E; Ott KH
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(2):256-60. PubMed ID: 16827030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cutting efficiency of three diamond bur grit sizes.
    Siegel SC; von Fraunhofer JA
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2000 Dec; 131(12):1706-10. PubMed ID: 11143734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.