142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17244283)
1. Laser nerve-sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a feasibility study.
Gianduzzo TR; Chang CM; El-Shazly M; Mustajab A; Moon DA; Eden CG
BJU Int; 2007 Apr; 99(4):875-9. PubMed ID: 17244283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Laser robotically assisted nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: a pilot study of technical feasibility in the canine model.
Gianduzzo T; Colombo JR; Haber GP; Hafron J; Magi-Galluzzi C; Aron M; Gill IS; Kaouk JH
BJU Int; 2008 Aug; 102(5):598-602. PubMed ID: 18694410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Nerve-sparing laparoscopic radical cystectomy: technique and initial outcomes.
Lane BR; Finelli A; Moinzadeh A; Sharp DS; Ukimura O; Kaouk JH; Gill IS
Urology; 2006 Oct; 68(4):778-83. PubMed ID: 17070352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Anatomic nerve-sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: comparison of retrograde and antegrade techniques.
Rassweiler J; Wagner AA; Moazin M; Gözen AS; Teber D; Frede T; Su LM
Urology; 2006 Sep; 68(3):587-91; discussion 591-2. PubMed ID: 17010729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of a flexible carbon dioxide laser fiber for precise dissection of the neurovascular bundle during robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.
Cheetham PJ; Truesdale MD; Lee DJ; Landman JM; Badani KK
J Endourol; 2010 Jul; 24(7):1091-6. PubMed ID: 20575698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intraoperative frozen section analysis during nerve sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: feasibility study.
Fromont G; Baumert H; Cathelineau X; Rozet F; Validire P; Vallancien G
J Urol; 2003 Nov; 170(5):1843-6. PubMed ID: 14532789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bilateral vs unilateral laparoscopic intrafascial nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: evaluation of surgical and functional outcomes in 457 patients.
Greco F; Hoda MR; Wagner S; Reichelt O; Inferrera A; Magno C; Fornara P
BJU Int; 2011 Aug; 108(4):583-7. PubMed ID: 21091973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Curtain dissection of the lateral prostatic fascia and potency after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a veil of mystery.
Chabert CC; Merrilees DA; Neill MG; Eden CG
BJU Int; 2008 May; 101(10):1285-8. PubMed ID: 18419701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Significance of neurovascular bundle formation observed on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging regarding postoperative erectile function after nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Lee SE; Hong SK; Han JH; Han BK; Yu JH; Jeong SJ; Byun SS; Lee HJ
Urology; 2007 Mar; 69(3):510-4. PubMed ID: 17382155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Significance of electrostimulation in detecting neurovascular bundle during radical prostatectomy.
Tsujimura A; Miyagawa Y; Takao T; Matsumiya K; Nakayama M; Tsujimoto Y; Takaha N; Nishimura K; Nonomura N; Takada T; Fujioka H; Kurokawa K; Aozasa K; Okuyama A
Int J Urol; 2006 Jul; 13(7):926-31. PubMed ID: 16882057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Lateral pedicle control during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: refined technique.
Gill IS; Ukimura O; Rubinstein M; Finelli A; Moinzadeh A; Singh D; Kaouk J; Miki T; Desai M
Urology; 2005 Jan; 65(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 15667856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Nerve-sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy at Siriraj Hospital.
Srinualnad S; Nualyong C
J Med Assoc Thai; 2007 Apr; 90(4):730-6. PubMed ID: 17487128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Feasibility study for robotic radical prostatectomy cautery-free neurovascular bundle preservation.
Ahlering TE; Eichel L; Chou D; Skarecky DW
Urology; 2005 May; 65(5):994-7. PubMed ID: 15882740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. KTP laser nerve sparing radical prostatectomy: comparison of ultrasonic and cold scissor dissection on cavernous nerve function.
Gianduzzo TR; Colombo JR; Haber GP; Magi-Galluzzi C; Dall'Oglio MF; Ulchaker J; Gill IS
J Urol; 2009 Jun; 181(6):2760-6. PubMed ID: 19375744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of preoperative endorectal MRI stage classification on neurovascular bundle sparing aggressiveness and the radical prostatectomy positive margin rate.
Brown JA; Rodin DM; Harisinghani M; Dahl DM
Urol Oncol; 2009; 27(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 18640062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Salvage robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: initial results and early report of outcomes.
Boris RS; Bhandari A; Krane LS; Eun D; Kaul S; Peabody JO
BJU Int; 2009 Apr; 103(7):952-6. PubMed ID: 19076132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Retrospective analysis of the distance between the neurovascular bundle and prostate cancer foci in radical prostatectomy specimens: its clinical implication in nerve-sparing surgery.
Inoue S; Shiina H; Hiraoka T; Mitsui Y; Sumura M; Urakami S; Igawa M
BJU Int; 2009 Oct; 104(8):1085-90. PubMed ID: 19388988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: current techniques.
Levinson AW; Su LM
Curr Opin Urol; 2007 Mar; 17(2):98-103. PubMed ID: 17285018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Early release of the neurovascular bundles and optical loupe magnification lead to improved and earlier return of potency following radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Chuang MS; O'Connor RC; Laven BA; Orvieto MA; Brendler CB
J Urol; 2005 Feb; 173(2):537-9. PubMed ID: 15643241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy: 'curtain dissection' of the neurovascular bundle.
Lunacek A; Schwentner C; Fritsch H; Bartsch G; Strasser H
BJU Int; 2005 Jun; 95(9):1226-31. PubMed ID: 15892806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
