343 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17245532)
61. Color-encoded semiautomatic analysis of multi-slice first-pass magnetic resonance perfusion: comparison to tetrofosmin single photon emission computed tomography perfusion and X-ray angiography.
Thiele H; Plein S; Breeuwer M; Ridgway JP; Higgins D; Thorley PJ; Schuler G; Sivananthan MU
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2004 Oct; 20(5):371-84; discussion 385-7. PubMed ID: 15765860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. [SPECT, coronary angio-CT, invasive coronary angiography and fusion images in stable coronary disease].
Pizzi MN; Aguadé-Bruix S; Roque A; Cuéllar-Calabria H; Romero-Farina G; García del Blanco B; Castell-Conesa J; García-Dorado D; Candell-Riera J
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol; 2015; 34(3):173-80. PubMed ID: 25555322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. The impact of transmission-emission misregistration on the interpretation of SPET/CT myocardial perfusion studies and the value of misregistration correction.
Apostolopoulos DJ; Gąsowska M; Savvopoulos CA; Skouras T; Spyridonidis T; Andrejczuk A; Vassilakos PJ
Hell J Nucl Med; 2015; 18(2):114-21. PubMed ID: 26187210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Correlation between severity of coronary artery stenosis and perfusion defect assessed by SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging.
Zaman MM; Haque SS; Siddique MA; Banerjee S; Ahmed CM; Sharma AK; Rahman MF; Haque MH; Joarder AI; Sultan AU; Fatema K
Mymensingh Med J; 2010 Oct; 19(4):608-13. PubMed ID: 20956907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. [Comparison of coronary angiography with myocardial perfusion imaging in assessment of functionally relevant coronary artery lesion].
Peng ZH; Huang JY; Pu H; Bai L; Chen JY; Li G; Huang J
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 2010 Jul; 38(7):601-5. PubMed ID: 21055281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Initial experience with X-ray CT based attenuation correction in myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging using a combined SPECT/CT system.
Utsunomiya D; Tomiguchi S; Shiraishi S; Yamada K; Honda T; Kawanaka K; Kojima A; Awai K; Yamashita Y
Ann Nucl Med; 2005 Sep; 19(6):485-9. PubMed ID: 16248385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Automated quantitative Rb-82 3D PET/CT myocardial perfusion imaging: normal limits and correlation with invasive coronary angiography.
Nakazato R; Berman DS; Dey D; Le Meunier L; Hayes SW; Fermin JS; Cheng VY; Thomson LE; Friedman JD; Germano G; Slomka PJ
J Nucl Cardiol; 2012 Apr; 19(2):265-76. PubMed ID: 22203445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Three-dimensional Fusion of Myocardial Perfusion SPECT and Invasive Coronary Angiography Guides Coronary Revascularization.
Xu Z; Tang H; Malhotra S; Dong M; Zhao C; Ye Z; Zhou Y; Xu S; Li D; Wang C; Zhou W
J Nucl Cardiol; 2022 Dec; 29(6):3267-3277. PubMed ID: 35194752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Regadenoson-stress myocardial CT perfusion and single-photon emission CT: rationale, design, and acquisition methods of a prospective, multicenter, multivendor comparison.
Cury RC; Kitt TM; Feaheny K; Akin J; George RT
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2014; 8(1):2-12. PubMed ID: 24314823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Incremental value of pharmacological stress cardiac dual-energy CT over coronary CT angiography alone for the assessment of coronary artery disease in a high-risk population.
De Cecco CN; Harris BS; Schoepf UJ; Silverman JR; McWhite CB; Krazinski AW; Bayer RR; Meinel FG
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Jul; 203(1):W70-7. PubMed ID: 24951230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. The diagnostic accuracy of 64-detector cardiac computed tomography compared with stress nuclear imaging in patients undergoing invasive cardiac catheterization.
Hamirani YS; Isma'eel H; Larijani V; Drury P; Lim W; Bevinal M; Saeed A; Ahmadi N; Karlsberg RP; Budoff MJ
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010; 34(5):645-51. PubMed ID: 20861764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Direct comparison of rest and adenosine stress myocardial perfusion CT with rest and stress SPECT.
Okada DR; Ghoshhajra BB; Blankstein R; Rocha-Filho JA; Shturman LD; Rogers IS; Bezerra HG; Sarwar A; Gewirtz H; Hoffmann U; Mamuya WS; Brady TJ; Cury RC
J Nucl Cardiol; 2010; 17(1):27-37. PubMed ID: 19936863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Comprehensive cardiac assessment with multislice computed tomography: evaluation of left ventricular function and perfusion in addition to coronary anatomy in patients with previous myocardial infarction.
Henneman MM; Schuijf JD; Jukema JW; Lamb HJ; de Roos A; Dibbets P; Stokkel MP; van der Wall EE; Bax JJ
Heart; 2006 Dec; 92(12):1779-83. PubMed ID: 16740917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Attenuation correction of myocardial SPECT perfusion images with low-dose CT: evaluation of the method by comparison with perfusion PET.
Fricke E; Fricke H; Weise R; Kammeier A; Hagedorn R; Lotz N; Lindner O; Tschoepe D; Burchert W
J Nucl Med; 2005 May; 46(5):736-44. PubMed ID: 15872344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. CT myocardial perfusion and coronary CT angiography: Influence of coronary calcium on a stress-rest protocol.
Ladeiras-Lopes R; Bettencourt N; Ferreira N; Sampaio F; Pires-Morais G; Santos L; Melica B; Rodrigues A; Braga P; Leite-Moreira A; Silva-Cardoso J; Gama V
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(3):215-20. PubMed ID: 26869367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Image fusion of coronary CT angiography and cardiac perfusion MRI: a pilot study.
Stolzmann P; Alkadhi H; Scheffel H; Hennemuth A; Kuehnel C; Baumueller S; Kozerke S; Falk V; Marincek B; Donati OF
Eur Radiol; 2010 May; 20(5):1174-9. PubMed ID: 20204639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Combined CT coronary angiography and stress myocardial perfusion imaging for hemodynamically significant stenoses in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: a comparison with fractional flow reserve.
Ko BS; Cameron JD; Leung M; Meredith IT; Leong DP; Antonis PR; Crossett M; Troupis J; Harper R; Malaiapan Y; Seneviratne SK
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Nov; 5(11):1097-111. PubMed ID: 23153909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Noncalcified atherosclerotic plaque burden at coronary CT angiography: a better predictor of ischemia at stress myocardial perfusion imaging than calcium score and stenosis severity.
Bauer RW; Thilo C; Chiaramida SA; Vogl TJ; Costello P; Schoepf UJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Aug; 193(2):410-8. PubMed ID: 19620437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Myocardial perfusion analysis in cardiac computed tomography angiographic images at rest.
Xiong G; Kola D; Heo R; Elmore K; Cho I; Min JK
Med Image Anal; 2015 Aug; 24(1):77-89. PubMed ID: 26073787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of stress SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging for detection of coronary artery disease in the distribution of first-order branch vessels, using an anatomical matching of angiographic and perfusion data.
Schwartz JG; Johnson RB; Aepfelbacher FC; Parker JA; Chen L; Azar RR; Parker RA; Danias PG
Nucl Med Commun; 2003 May; 24(5):543-9. PubMed ID: 12717072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
