These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17247413)

  • 1. A Comparative Study of Mutation Rates in Two Ecologically Diverse Species of Drosophila.
    Dobzhansky T; Spassky B; Spassky N
    Genetics; 1952 Nov; 37(6):650-64. PubMed ID: 17247413
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Phylogeny of the Genus
    O'Grady PM; DeSalle R
    Genetics; 2018 May; 209(1):1-25. PubMed ID: 29716983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biological basis of germline mutation: comparisons of spontaneous germline mutation rates among drosophila, mouse, and human.
    Drost JB; Lee WR
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 1995; 25 Suppl 26():48-64. PubMed ID: 7789362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Metabolic pools differ among ecologically diverse Drosophila species.
    Matzkin LM; Mutsaka K; Johnson S; Markow TA
    J Insect Physiol; 2009 Dec; 55(12):1145-50. PubMed ID: 19698720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transcriptional responses of ecologically diverse Drosophila species to larval diets differing in relative sugar and protein ratios.
    Nazario-Yepiz NO; Loustalot-Laclette MR; Carpinteyro-Ponce J; Abreu-Goodger C; Markow TA
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0183007. PubMed ID: 28832647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ecological genomics of host shifts in Drosophila mojavensis.
    Matzkin LM
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2014; 781():233-47. PubMed ID: 24277303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative genetic mutation frequencies based on amino acid composition differences.
    Vieira A
    Mutat Res; 2006 Aug; 600(1-2):89-92. PubMed ID: 16806292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Inferring divergence of context-dependent substitution rates in Drosophila genomes with applications to comparative genomics.
    Chachick R; Tanay A
    Mol Biol Evol; 2012 Jul; 29(7):1769-80. PubMed ID: 22319143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interspecies Comparative Analyses Reveal Distinct Carbohydrate-Responsive Systems among Drosophila Species.
    Watanabe K; Kanaoka Y; Mizutani S; Uchiyama H; Yajima S; Watada M; Uemura T; Hattori Y
    Cell Rep; 2019 Sep; 28(10):2594-2607.e7. PubMed ID: 31484071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rates of synonymous substitution and base composition of nuclear genes in Drosophila.
    Moriyama EN; Gojobori T
    Genetics; 1992 Apr; 130(4):855-64. PubMed ID: 1582562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative evolutionary analysis of rDNA ITS regions in Drosophila.
    Schlötterer C; Hauser MT; von Haeseler A; Tautz D
    Mol Biol Evol; 1994 May; 11(3):513-22. PubMed ID: 8015444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Substitution rates in Drosophila nuclear genes: implications for translational selection.
    Dunn KA; Bielawski JP; Yang Z
    Genetics; 2001 Jan; 157(1):295-305. PubMed ID: 11139510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Induction of rapid cold hardening by cooling at ecologically relevant rates in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Kelty JD; Lee RE
    J Insect Physiol; 1999 Aug; 45(8):719-726. PubMed ID: 12770302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The mobilome of Drosophila incompta, a flower-breeding species: comparison of transposable element landscapes among generalist and specialist flies.
    Fonseca PM; Moura RD; Wallau GL; Loreto ELS
    Chromosome Res; 2019 Sep; 27(3):203-219. PubMed ID: 31119502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reproductive isolation and the period gene of Drosophila.
    Ritchie MG; Kyriacou CP
    Mol Ecol; 1994 Dec; 3(6):595-9. PubMed ID: 7834109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of lead pollution on fitness and its dependence on heterozygosity in Drosophila subobscura.
    Tanaskovic M; Novicic ZK; Kenig B; Stamenkovic-Radak M; Andjelkovic M
    J Genet; 2015 Dec; 94(4):643-9. PubMed ID: 26690519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. MUTATION RATES OF LOW DOSE LEVEL IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER.
    SHIOMI T; INAGAKI E; INAGAKI H; NAKAO Y
    J Radiat Res; 1963; 4():105-10. PubMed ID: 14193260
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Distinctive and Host-Restricted Gut Microbiota in Populations of a Cactophilic Drosophila Species.
    Martinson VG; Carpinteyro-Ponce J; Moran NA; Markow TA
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2017 Dec; 83(23):. PubMed ID: 28939605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A database of wing diversity in the Hawaiian Drosophila.
    Edwards KA; Doescher LT; Kaneshiro KY; Yamamoto D
    PLoS One; 2007 May; 2(5):e487. PubMed ID: 17534437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genome-wide comparative analysis of four Indian Drosophila species.
    Mohanty S; Khanna R
    Mol Genet Genomics; 2017 Dec; 292(6):1197-1208. PubMed ID: 28660309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.