These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17248464)

  • 1. Selection in finite populations with multiple alleles I. Limits to directional selection.
    Latter BD; Novitski CE
    Genetics; 1969 Aug; 62(4):859-76. PubMed ID: 17248464
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of mutation on selection limits in finite populations with multiple alleles.
    Zeng ZB; Tachida H; Cockerham CC
    Genetics; 1989 Aug; 122(4):977-84. PubMed ID: 2759434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The components of directional and disruptive selection in heterogeneous group-structured populations.
    Ohtsuki H; Rueffler C; Wakano JY; Parvinen K; Lehmann L
    J Theor Biol; 2020 Dec; 507():110449. PubMed ID: 32814071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Phenotypic selection in natural populations: what limits directional selection?
    Kingsolver JG; Diamond SE
    Am Nat; 2011 Mar; 177(3):346-57. PubMed ID: 21460543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Selection in finite populations with multiple alleles. II. Centripetal selection, mutation, and isoallelic variation.
    Latter BD
    Genetics; 1970 Sep; 66(1):165-86. PubMed ID: 5512470
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interaction between natural selection for heterozygotes and directional selection.
    Verghese MW
    Genetics; 1974 Jan; 76(1):163-8. PubMed ID: 4818263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Recombination can evolve in large finite populations given selection on sufficient loci.
    Iles MM; Walters K; Cannings C
    Genetics; 2003 Dec; 165(4):2249-58. PubMed ID: 14704200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genetic analysis of differentiation among breeding ponds reveals a candidate gene for local adaptation in Rana arvalis.
    Richter-Boix A; Quintela M; Segelbacher G; Laurila A
    Mol Ecol; 2011 Apr; 20(8):1582-600. PubMed ID: 21332585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Selection and biased gene conversion in a multigene family: consequences of interallelic bias and threshold selection.
    Walsh JB
    Genetics; 1986 Mar; 112(3):699-716. PubMed ID: 3957008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Coevolution fails to maintain genetic variation in a host-parasite model with constant finite population size.
    MacPherson A; Keeling MJ; Otto SP
    Theor Popul Biol; 2021 Feb; 137():10-21. PubMed ID: 33340528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Selection for recombination in structured populations.
    Martin G; Otto SP; Lenormand T
    Genetics; 2006 Jan; 172(1):593-609. PubMed ID: 15944358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Response to Selection in Finite Locus Models with Nonadditive Effects.
    Esfandyari H; Henryon M; Berg P; Thomasen JR; Bijma P; Sørensen AC
    J Hered; 2017 May; 108(3):318-327. PubMed ID: 28082328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genetic variation in a heterogeneous environment. II. Temporal heterogeneity and directional selection.
    Hedrick PW
    Genetics; 1976 Sep; 84(1):145-57. PubMed ID: 992363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Haploids, polymorphisms and fluctuating selection.
    Dean AM
    Theor Popul Biol; 2018 Dec; 124():16-30. PubMed ID: 30208298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of strong directional selection on weakly selected mutations at linked sites: implication for synonymous codon usage.
    Kim Y
    Mol Biol Evol; 2004 Feb; 21(2):286-94. PubMed ID: 14660698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predicting long-term response to selection.
    Reeve JP
    Genet Res; 2000 Feb; 75(1):83-94. PubMed ID: 10740924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Geographic heterogeneity in natural selection on an MHC locus in sockeye salmon.
    Miller KM; Kaukinen KH; Beacham TD; Withler RE
    Genetica; 2001; 111(1-3):237-57. PubMed ID: 11841169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Two steps forward, one step back: the pleiotropic effects of favoured alleles.
    Otto SP
    Proc Biol Sci; 2004 Apr; 271(1540):705-14. PubMed ID: 15209104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Influence of Selection on MHC DQA and DQB Haplotypes in the Endemic New Zealand Hector's and Māui Dolphins.
    Heimeier D; Alexander A; Hamner RM; Pichler F; Baker CS
    J Hered; 2018 Oct; 109(7):744-756. PubMed ID: 30247626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genomics, environment and balancing selection in behaviourally bimodal populations: The caribou case.
    Cavedon M; Gubili C; Heppenheimer E; vonHoldt B; Mariani S; Hebblewhite M; Hegel T; Hervieux D; Serrouya R; Steenweg R; Weckworth BV; Musiani M
    Mol Ecol; 2019 Apr; 28(8):1946-1963. PubMed ID: 30714247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.