These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17248914)

  • 1. Variance in quantitative traits due to linked dominant genes and variance in heterozygosity in small populations.
    Avery PJ; Hill WG
    Genetics; 1979 Apr; 91(4):817-44. PubMed ID: 17248914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Expected influence of linkage disequilibrium on genetic variance caused by dominance and epistasis on quantitative traits.
    Hill WG; Mäki-Tanila A
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2015 Apr; 132(2):176-86. PubMed ID: 25823842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of genetic drift on variance components under a general model of epistasis.
    Barton NH; Turelli M
    Evolution; 2004 Oct; 58(10):2111-32. PubMed ID: 15562679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of epistasis on the excess of the additive and nonadditive variances after population bottlenecks.
    López-Fanjul C; Fernández A; Toro MA
    Evolution; 2002 May; 56(5):865-76. PubMed ID: 12093023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A genome scan for quantitative trait loci influencing carcass, post-natal growth and reproductive traits in commercial Angus cattle.
    McClure MC; Morsci NS; Schnabel RD; Kim JW; Yao P; Rolf MM; McKay SD; Gregg SJ; Chapple RH; Northcutt SL; Taylor JF
    Anim Genet; 2010 Dec; 41(6):597-607. PubMed ID: 20477797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of genetic drift on the variance/covariance components generated by multilocus additive x additive epistatic systems.
    López-Fanjul C; Fernández A; Toro MA
    J Theor Biol; 2006 Mar; 239(2):161-71. PubMed ID: 16242726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of identity disequilibrium and linkage on quantitative variation in finite populations.
    Tachida H; Cockerham CC
    Genet Res; 1989 Feb; 53(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 2714647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The contribution of quantitative trait loci and neutral marker loci to the genetic variances and covariances among quantitative traits in random mating populations.
    Ruiz A; Barbadilla A
    Genetics; 1995 Jan; 139(1):445-55. PubMed ID: 7705644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Testing for linkage disequilibrium in the New Zealand radiata pine breeding population.
    Kumar S; Echt C; Wilcox PL; Richardson TE
    Theor Appl Genet; 2004 Jan; 108(2):292-8. PubMed ID: 12898020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Epistasis and the temporal change in the additive variance-covariance matrix induced by drift.
    López-Fanjul C; Fernández A; Toro MA
    Evolution; 2004 Aug; 58(8):1655-63. PubMed ID: 15446420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of microsatellite loci to classify individuals by relatedness.
    Blouin MS; Parsons M; Lacaille V; Lotz S
    Mol Ecol; 1996 Jun; 5(3):393-401. PubMed ID: 8688959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of dominance, regular inbreeding and sampling design on Q(ST), an estimator of population differentiation for quantitative traits.
    Goudet J; Büchi L
    Genetics; 2006 Feb; 172(2):1337-47. PubMed ID: 16322514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A quantitative model of the relationship between phenotypic variance and heterozygosity at marker loci under partial selfing.
    David P
    Genetics; 1999 Nov; 153(3):1463-74. PubMed ID: 10545474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The variance of sample heterozygosity.
    Weir BS; Reynolds J; Dodds KG
    Theor Popul Biol; 1990 Feb; 37(1):235-53. PubMed ID: 2326765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Heterotic quantitative trait loci analysis and genomic prediction of seedling biomass-related traits in maize triple testcross populations.
    Zhang T; Jiang L; Ruan L; Qian Y; Liang S; Lin F; Lu H; Dai H; Zhao H
    Plant Methods; 2021 Jul; 17(1):85. PubMed ID: 34330310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Molecular-marker-facilitated investigations of quantitative-trait loci in maize. I. Numbers, genomic distribution and types of gene action.
    Edwards MD; Stuber CW; Wendel JF
    Genetics; 1987 May; 116(1):113-25. PubMed ID: 3596228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Heterozygosity for genes influencing a quantitative trait.
    Du FX; DeNise SK; Woodward BW
    J Anim Sci; 2002 Jun; 80(6):1478-88. PubMed ID: 12078727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Epistatic analysis of carcass characteristics in pigs reveals genomic interactions between quantitative trait loci attributable to additive and dominance genetic effects.
    Duthie C; Simm G; Doeschl-Wilson A; Kalm E; Knap PW; Roehe R
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Jul; 88(7):2219-34. PubMed ID: 20228239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficiency of selection, as measured by single nucleotide polymorphism variation, is dependent on inbreeding rate in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Demontis D; Pertoldi C; Loeschcke V; Mikkelsen K; Axelsson T; Kristensen TN
    Mol Ecol; 2009 Nov; 18(22):4551-63. PubMed ID: 19780974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genomic BLUP including additive and dominant variation in purebreds and F1 crossbreds, with an application in pigs.
    Vitezica ZG; Varona L; Elsen JM; Misztal I; Herring W; Legarra A
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jan; 48():6. PubMed ID: 26825279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.