These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17249006)

  • 1. An experimental comparison of selection alternatives to plateaued response.
    Brown WP; Bell AE
    Genetics; 1980 Feb; 94(2):477-96. PubMed ID: 17249006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reciprocal Recurrent Selection Compared to within-Strain Selection for Increasing Rate of Egg Lay of Tribolium under Optimal and Stress Conditions.
    Orozco F; Bell AE
    Genetics; 1974 May; 77(1):143-61. PubMed ID: 17248651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genetic correlation and heritabilities for purebred and crossbred performance in poultry egg production traits.
    Wei M; van der Werf JH
    J Anim Sci; 1995 Aug; 73(8):2220-6. PubMed ID: 8567456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genomic selection of purebred animals for crossbred performance in the presence of dominant gene action.
    Zeng J; Toosi A; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Apr; 45(1):11. PubMed ID: 23621868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of crossbred and purebred selection for a heterotic trait in highly selected populations of Tribolium.
    McNew RW; Bell AE
    J Hered; 1976; 67(5):275-83. PubMed ID: 1010928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimizing genomic reference populations to improve crossbred performance.
    Wientjes YCJ; Bijma P; Calus MPL
    Genet Sel Evol; 2020 Nov; 52(1):65. PubMed ID: 33158416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Purebred and Crossbred Genomic Evaluation and Mate Allocation Strategies To Exploit Dominance in Pig Crossbreeding Schemes.
    González-Diéguez D; Tusell L; Bouquet A; Legarra A; Vitezica ZG
    G3 (Bethesda); 2020 Aug; 10(8):2829-2841. PubMed ID: 32554752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reciprocal recurrent selection for 21-day litter weight of crossbred gilts. II. Reproductive performance of purebred females producing purebred and two-way cross litters and performance of purebred and crossbred pigs.
    Young LD; Omtvedt IT; Whatley JA; Johnson RK
    J Anim Sci; 1983 Dec; 57(6):1431-9. PubMed ID: 6674283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of Predicted Genomic Breeding Values in Purebred and Crossbred Pigs.
    Hidalgo AM; Bastiaansen JW; Lopes MS; Harlizius B; Groenen MA; de Koning DJ
    G3 (Bethesda); 2015 May; 5(8):1575-83. PubMed ID: 26019187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reciprocal recurrent selection for 21-day litter weight of crossbred gilts. I. Selection applied and genetic change in reproduction of crossbred gilts.
    Young LD; Omtvedt IT; Whatley JA; Johnson RK
    J Anim Sci; 1983 Dec; 57(6):1418-30. PubMed ID: 6674282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A bivariate genomic model with additive, dominance and inbreeding depression effects for sire line and three-way crossbred pigs.
    Christensen OF; Nielsen B; Su G; Xiang T; Madsen P; Ostersen T; Velander I; Strathe AB
    Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Aug; 51(1):45. PubMed ID: 31426753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Maximizing crossbred performance through purebred genomic selection.
    Esfandyari H; Sørensen AC; Bijma P
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Mar; 47(1):16. PubMed ID: 25887297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Marker-assisted selection for commercial crossbred performance.
    Dekkers JC
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Sep; 85(9):2104-14. PubMed ID: 17504955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genomic prediction of crossbred performance based on purebred Landrace and Yorkshire data using a dominance model.
    Esfandyari H; Bijma P; Henryon M; Christensen OF; Sørensen AC
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jun; 48(1):40. PubMed ID: 27276993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimating the purebred-crossbred genetic correlation for uniformity of eggshell color in laying hens.
    Mulder HA; Visscher J; Fablet J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 May; 48(1):39. PubMed ID: 27151311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing Alternative Single-Step GBLUP Approaches and Training Population Designs for Genomic Evaluation of Crossbred Animals.
    Alvarenga AB; Veroneze R; Oliveira HR; Marques DBD; Lopes PS; Silva FF; Brito LF
    Front Genet; 2020; 11():263. PubMed ID: 32328083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Gene differential expression of liver tissues in crossbred versus purebred chicken and their relationship with heterosis of meat trait].
    Wang D; Zhang Y; Sun DX; Yu Y; Xu GY; Li JY
    Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2004 Mar; 31(3):257-64. PubMed ID: 15195564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genomic evaluation by including dominance effects and inbreeding depression for purebred and crossbred performance with an application in pigs.
    Xiang T; Christensen OF; Vitezica ZG; Legarra A
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Nov; 48(1):92. PubMed ID: 27887565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Balanced selection on purebred and crossbred performance increases gain in crossbreds.
    Esfandyari H; Berg P; Sørensen AC
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Mar; 50(1):8. PubMed ID: 29566647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pedigree and genomic evaluation of pigs using a terminal-cross model.
    Tusell L; Gilbert H; Riquet J; Mercat MJ; Legarra A; Larzul C
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Apr; 48():32. PubMed ID: 27056443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.