214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17249204)
1. Differentiation between malignant and benign ovarian tumors by magnetic resonance imaging.
Chen M; Wang WC; Zhou C; Zhou NN; Cai K; Yang ZH; Zhao WF; Li SY; Li GZ
Chin Med Sci J; 2006 Dec; 21(4):270-5. PubMed ID: 17249204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Complex adnexal masses: detection and characterization with MR imaging--multivariate analysis.
Hricak H; Chen M; Coakley FV; Kinkel K; Yu KK; Sica G; Bacchetti P; Powell CB
Radiology; 2000 Jan; 214(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 10644099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Magnetic resonance evaluation of adnexal masses.
Guerra A; Cunha TM; Félix A
Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):700-9. PubMed ID: 18568564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Characterization of adnexal masses using feature analysis at contrast-enhanced helical computed tomography.
Zhang J; Mironov S; Hricak H; Ishill NM; Moskowitz CS; Soslow RA; Chi DS
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2008; 32(4):533-40. PubMed ID: 18664838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of combination of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography for evaluation of ovarian masses.
Tsuboyama T; Tatsumi M; Onishi H; Nakamoto A; Kim T; Hori M; Sakane M; Hori Y; Morii E; Hatazawa J; Tomiyama N
Invest Radiol; 2014 Aug; 49(8):524-31. PubMed ID: 24637584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Value of CT scan and MRI in primary tumors of the ovary].
Mugel T; Ghossain M; Buy JN; Malbec L; Vadrot D
J Chir (Paris); 1993 Nov; 130(11):486-91. PubMed ID: 8163607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Semi-quantitative contrast-enhanced MR analysis of indeterminate ovarian tumours: when to say malignancy?
Mansour SM; Saraya S; El-Faissal Y
Br J Radiol; 2015 Sep; 88(1053):20150099. PubMed ID: 26083260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Adnexal masses: accuracy of detection and differentiation with multidetector computed tomography.
Tsili AC; Tsampoulas C; Charisiadi A; Kalef-Ezra J; Dousias V; Paraskevaidis E; Efremidis SC
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Jul; 110(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 18486202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Characterization of adnexal mass lesions on MR imaging.
Sohaib SA; Sahdev A; Van Trappen P; Jacobs IJ; Reznek RH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 May; 180(5):1297-304. PubMed ID: 12704041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. MR imaging compared with intraoperative frozen-section examination for the diagnosis of adnexal tumors; correlation with final histology.
Bazot M; Nassar-Slaba J; Thomassin-Naggara I; Cortez A; Uzan S; Daraï E
Eur Radiol; 2006 Dec; 16(12):2687-99. PubMed ID: 16547708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ovarian lesions: detection and characterization with gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging at 1.5 T.
Stevens SK; Hricak H; Stern JL
Radiology; 1991 Nov; 181(2):481-8. PubMed ID: 1924792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Characterization of sonographically indeterminate ovarian tumors with MR imaging. A logistic regression analysis.
Yamashita Y; Hatanaka Y; Torashima M; Takahashi M; Miyazaki K; Okamura H
Acta Radiol; 1997 Jul; 38(4 Pt 1):572-7. PubMed ID: 9240680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Adnexal masses: accuracy of characterization with transvaginal US and precontrast and postcontrast MR imaging.
Yamashita Y; Torashima M; Hatanaka Y; Harada M; Higashida Y; Takahashi M; Mizutani H; Tashiro H; Iwamasa J; Miyazaki K
Radiology; 1995 Feb; 194(2):557-65. PubMed ID: 7824738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. MR imaging in discriminating between benign and malignant paediatric ovarian masses: a systematic review.
van Nimwegen LWE; Mavinkurve-Groothuis AMC; de Krijger RR; Hulsker CCC; Goverde AJ; Zsiros J; Littooij AS
Eur Radiol; 2020 Feb; 30(2):1166-1181. PubMed ID: 31529256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Solid non-invasive ovarian masses on MR: histopathology and a diagnostic approach.
Tanaka YO; Okada S; Satoh T; Matsumoto K; Saida T; Oki A; Yoshikawa H; Minami M
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Nov; 80(2):e91-7. PubMed ID: 20576386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of contrast-enhanced sonography and MRI in displaying anatomic features of cystic pancreatic masses.
D'Onofrio M; Megibow AJ; Faccioli N; Malagò R; Capelli P; Falconi M; Mucelli RP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Dec; 189(6):1435-42. PubMed ID: 18029882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Classification of asymptomatic adnexal masses by ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography.
Grab D; Flock F; Stöhr I; Nüssle K; Rieber A; Fenchel S; Brambs HJ; Reske SN; Kreienberg R
Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Jun; 77(3):454-9. PubMed ID: 10831359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. MR imaging of pelvic masses in women: contrast-enhanced vs unenhanced images.
Thurnher SA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Dec; 159(6):1243-50. PubMed ID: 1442393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging as an Adjunct to CA125 and HE4 to Improve Characterization of Large Ovarian Masses.
Manganaro L; Anastasi E; Porpora MG; Vinci V; Saldari M; Bernardo S; Ballesio L; Sollazzo P; Pecorella I; Recchia N; Stracci F; Panici PB; Angeloni A; Catalano C; Scialpi M
Anticancer Res; 2015 Nov; 35(11):6341-51. PubMed ID: 26504074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Imaging strategy for early ovarian cancer: characterization of adnexal masses with conventional and advanced imaging techniques.
Mohaghegh P; Rockall AG
Radiographics; 2012 Oct; 32(6):1751-73. PubMed ID: 23065168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
