189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17250541)
1. Allergy patch test reading from photographic images: disagreement on ICDRG grading but agreement on simplified tripartite reading.
Ivens U; Serup J; O'goshi K
Skin Res Technol; 2007 Feb; 13(1):110-3. PubMed ID: 17250541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantification of allergic and irritant patch test reactions using ImageJ.
Ohshima H; Kinoshita S; Futagawa M; Takiwaki H; Washizaki K; Ishiko A; Kanto H
Skin Res Technol; 2014 May; 20(2):177-81. PubMed ID: 24118475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The importance of context information in the diagnostic rating of digital images of patch test reactions.
Uter W; Frosch PJ; Becker D; Schnuch A; Pfahlberg A; Gefeller O
Br J Dermatol; 2009 Sep; 161(3):554-9. PubMed ID: 19438463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The validity of rating patch test reactions based on digital images.
Uter W; Becker D; Schnuch A; Gefeller O; Frosch PJ
Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Nov; 57(5):337-42. PubMed ID: 17937750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Course of contact allergy in consecutive eczema patients patch tested with TRUE Test panels 1 and 2 at least twice over a 12-year period.
Jensen CD; Andersen KE
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 May; 52(5):242-6. PubMed ID: 15898996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The reaction index and positivity ratio revisited.
Andersen KE; Andersen F
Contact Dermatitis; 2008 Jan; 58(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 18154555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. 'Calibration' of our patch test reading technique is necessary.
Svedman C; Isaksson M; Björk J; Mowitz M; Bruze M
Contact Dermatitis; 2012 Apr; 66(4):180-7. PubMed ID: 22404193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Contact eczema and "standard test"--do "International Standard Test Series" coincide with Austrian local characteristics?].
Aberer W; Reiter E; Ziegler V; Wechdorn D
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1991; 103(13):375-80. PubMed ID: 1832801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of scalp coverage scoring methods for scalp hair loss in male pattern hair loss (androgenetic alopecia).
Van Neste D; Sandraps E; Herbaut D; Lelubre P; Leroy T
Skin Res Technol; 2006 May; 12(2):89-93. PubMed ID: 16626381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Papulo-vesicular count for the rating of allergic patch test reactions. A simple technique based on polysulfide rubber replica.
Peters K; Serup J
Acta Derm Venereol; 1987; 67(6):491-5. PubMed ID: 2451373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Positive patch test reaction without clinical contact dermatitis--what is the best approach in medico-legal evaluation?].
Fartasch M; Drexler H; Diepgen TL; John SM; Brandenburg S
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges; 2008 Jan; 6(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 18190432
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantitative evaluation of patch test reactions: a comparison between visual grading and erythema index image analysis.
Ohshima H; Takiwaki H; Washizaki K; Ishiko A; Itoh M; Kanto H
Skin Res Technol; 2011 May; 17(2):220-5. PubMed ID: 21332805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-part scoring system (tripartite) for teledermatology versus International Contact Dermatitis Research Group criteria to interpret patch test readings: A comparative, observational study.
Jasly K; Goyal S; Ashwini PK; Kanthraj GR; Chethana SG; Ranugha S
Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol; 2024 Apr; ():1-7. PubMed ID: 38594974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contact allergy in children referred for patch testing: North American Contact Dermatitis Group data, 2001-2004.
Zug KA; McGinley-Smith D; Warshaw EM; Taylor JS; Rietschel RL; Maibach HI; Belsito DV; Fowler JF; Storrs FJ; DeLeo VA; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Sasseville D
Arch Dermatol; 2008 Oct; 144(10):1329-36. PubMed ID: 18936397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Delayed patch test reading after 5 days: the Mayo Clinic experience.
Davis MD; Bhate K; Rohlinger AL; Farmer SA; Richardson DM; Weaver AL
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2008 Aug; 59(2):225-33. PubMed ID: 18513826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A study on expert reading of patch test reactions: inter-individual accordance.
Bruze M; Isaksson M; Edman B; Björkner B; Fregert S; Möller H
Contact Dermatitis; 1995 Jun; 32(6):331-7. PubMed ID: 7554879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A high-positive patch test load correlates with further positive patch test reactions irrespective of their location.
Brasch J; Geier J; Schnuch A; Uter W; ;
Allergy; 2006 Dec; 61(12):1411-5. PubMed ID: 17073870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of allergic vesicular reaction to patch test using in vivo confocal microscopy.
Ardigò M; Longo C; Cristaudo A; Berardesca E; Pellacani G
Skin Res Technol; 2012 Feb; 18(1):61-3. PubMed ID: 21443755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Good clinical practice in patch testing: readings beyond day 2 are necessary: a confirmatory analysis. Members of the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology.
Uter WJ; Geier J; Schnuch A
Am J Contact Dermat; 1996 Dec; 7(4):231-7. PubMed ID: 8955487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Interpretation and relevance of patch testing: false-positive and false-negative test reactions, compound allergy, cross-sensitivity].
Le Coz CJ; Sasseville D
Ann Dermatol Venereol; 2009; 136(8-9):610-6. PubMed ID: 19686897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
