189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17250541)
21. Inter-rater variability in patch test readings and final interpretation using store-forward teledermatology.
Goodier MC; DeKoven JG; Taylor JS; Sasseville D; Fowler JF; Fransway AF; DeLeo VA; Marks JG; Zug KA; Hylwa SA; Warshaw EM
Contact Dermatitis; 2021 Sep; 85(3):274-284. PubMed ID: 33837533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Patch test results with metals and meteorological conditions.
Hegewald J; Uter W; Kranke B; Schnuch A; Gefeller O; Pfahlberg A
Int Arch Allergy Immunol; 2008; 147(3):235-40. PubMed ID: 18594154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Objective evaluation of skin prick test reactions using digital photography.
dos Santos RV; Titus RG; Lima HC
Skin Res Technol; 2007 May; 13(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 17374055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Web-based grading of compressed stereoscopic digital photography versus standard slide film photography for the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy.
Rudnisky CJ; Tennant MT; Weis E; Ting A; Hinz BJ; Greve MD
Ophthalmology; 2007 Sep; 114(9):1748-54. PubMed ID: 17368543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Allergic patch test reactions associated with cosmetics: retrospective analysis of cross-sectional data from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group, 2001-2004.
Warshaw EM; Buchholz HJ; Belsito DV; Maibach HI; Fowler JF; Rietschel RL; Zug KA; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Sasseville D; Storrs FJ; Taylor JS; Deleo VA; Marks JG
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2009 Jan; 60(1):23-38. PubMed ID: 18992965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Quantitative evaluation of elderly skin based on digital image analysis.
Tanaka H; Nakagami G; Sanada H; Sari Y; Kobayashi H; Kishi K; Konya C; Tadaka E
Skin Res Technol; 2008 May; 14(2):192-200. PubMed ID: 18412562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Differentiating allergic and irritant contact dermatitis by high-definition optical coherence tomography: a pilot study.
Boone MA; Jemec GB; Del Marmol V
Arch Dermatol Res; 2015 Jan; 307(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 25186162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Irritant and allergic responses as influenced by triamcinolone in patch test materials.
Rietschel RL
Arch Dermatol; 1985 Jan; 121(1):68-9. PubMed ID: 3966823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Value of photo assessment in late patch test readings-A multicenter study from six European patch test clinics.
Yüksel YT; Sedeh FB; Brans R; Svedman C; Paulsen E; Gimenéz-Arnau A; Foti C; Agner T;
Contact Dermatitis; 2021 May; 84(5):283-289. PubMed ID: 33152126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Changing trends and allergens in the patch test standard series: a mayo clinic 5-year retrospective review, january 1, 2001, through december 31, 2005.
Davis MD; Scalf LA; Yiannias JA; Cheng JF; El-Azhary RA; Rohlinger AL; Farmer SA; Fett DD; Johnson JS; Linehan DL; Richardson DM; Schroeter AL; Connolly SM
Arch Dermatol; 2008 Jan; 144(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 18209170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Non-invasive evaluation techniques to quantify the efficacy of cosmetic anti-cellulite products.
Bielfeldt S; Buttgereit P; Brandt M; Springmann G; Wilhelm KP
Skin Res Technol; 2008 Aug; 14(3):336-46. PubMed ID: 19159381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Reflectance of human skin using colour photometric stereo: with particular application to pigmented lesion analysis.
Sun J; Smith M; Smith L; Coutts L; Dabis R; Harland C; Bamber J
Skin Res Technol; 2008 May; 14(2):173-9. PubMed ID: 18412559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Sodium tetrachloropalladate (Na2[PdCl4]) as an improved test salt for palladium allergy patch testing.
Muris J; Kleverlaan CJ; Feilzer AJ; Rustemeyer T
Contact Dermatitis; 2008 Jan; 58(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 18154558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Anogenital allergic contact dermatitis, the role of spices and flavour allergy.
Vermaat H; Smienk F; Rustemeyer T; Bruynzeel DP; Kirtschig G
Contact Dermatitis; 2008 Oct; 59(4):233-7. PubMed ID: 18844699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Classification of papulo-squamous skin diseases using image analysis.
Mashaly HM; Masood NA; Mohamed AS
Skin Res Technol; 2012 Feb; 18(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 21338407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Standardization of patch tests in Japan.
Contact Dermatitis; 1976 Aug; 2(4):205-11. PubMed ID: 1021351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Allergic skin disease: investigation of both immediate- and delayed-type hypersensitivity is essential.
Usmani N; Wilkinson SM
Clin Exp Allergy; 2007 Oct; 37(10):1541-6. PubMed ID: 17883733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The impact of meteorological conditions on patch test results with 12 standard series allergens (fragrances, biocides, topical ingredients).
Uter W; Hegewald J; Kränke B; Schnuch A; Gefeller O; Pfahlberg A
Br J Dermatol; 2008 Apr; 158(4):734-9. PubMed ID: 18284398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Enhancement of visual scoring of skin irritant reactions using cross-polarized light and parallel-polarized light.
Farage MA
Contact Dermatitis; 2008 Mar; 58(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 18279152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Patch test reactions through the lens of dermoscopy: Further insights, particularly on weak allergic reactions.
Corazza M; Toni G; Scuderi V; Forconi R; Borghi A
Contact Dermatitis; 2019 Dec; 81(6):417-425. PubMed ID: 31373019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
