174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17252247)
1. First year radiology residents not taking call: will there be a difference?
Strub WM; Leach JL; Ying J; Vagal A
Emerg Radiol; 2007 Feb; 13(5):231-5. PubMed ID: 17252247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Overnight resident interpretation of torso CT at a level 1 trauma center an analysis and review of the literature.
Chung JH; Strigel RM; Chew AR; Albrecht E; Gunn ML
Acad Radiol; 2009 Sep; 16(9):1155-60. PubMed ID: 19481962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. On-Call Radiology Resident Discrepancies: Categorization by Patient Location and Severity.
Mellnick V; Raptis C; McWilliams S; Picus D; Wahl R
J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Oct; 13(10):1233-1238. PubMed ID: 27319372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Preliminary radiology resident interpretations versus final attending radiologist interpretations and the impact on patient care in a community hospital.
Ruchman RB; Jaeger J; Wiggins EF; Seinfeld S; Thakral V; Bolla S; Wallach S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Sep; 189(3):523-6. PubMed ID: 17715095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preliminary interpretations of after-hours CT and sonography by radiology residents versus final interpretations by body imaging radiologists at a level 1 trauma center.
Carney E; Kempf J; DeCarvalho V; Yudd A; Nosher J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Aug; 181(2):367-73. PubMed ID: 12876012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Radiology resident preliminary reporting in an independent call environment: multiyear assessment of volume, timeliness, and accuracy.
Weinberg BD; Richter MD; Champine JG; Morriss MC; Browning T
J Am Coll Radiol; 2015 Jan; 12(1):95-100. PubMed ID: 25557573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The discrepancy rate between preliminary and official reports of emergency radiology studies: a performance indicator and quality improvement method.
Issa G; Taslakian B; Itani M; Hitti E; Batley N; Saliba M; El-Merhi F
Acta Radiol; 2015 May; 56(5):598-604. PubMed ID: 24833644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Identifying benchmarks for discrepancy rates in preliminary interpretations provided by radiology trainees at an academic institution.
Ruutiainen AT; Scanlon MH; Itri JN
J Am Coll Radiol; 2011 Sep; 8(9):644-8. PubMed ID: 21889753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Increased error rates in preliminary reports issued by radiology residents working more than 10 consecutive hours overnight.
Ruutiainen AT; Durand DJ; Scanlon MH; Itri JN
Acad Radiol; 2013 Mar; 20(3):305-11. PubMed ID: 23452475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. 24/7/365 Neuroradiologist Coverage Improves Resident Perception of Educational Experience, Referring Physician Satisfaction, and Turnaround Time.
Spitler K; Vijayasarathi A; Salehi B; Dua S; Azizyan A; Cekic M; Yaghmai N; Homer R; Salamon N
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2020; 49(3):168-172. PubMed ID: 30391225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Discrepancy rates of on-call radiology residents' interpretations of CT angiography studies of the neck and circle of Willis.
Meyer RE; Nickerson JP; Burbank HN; Alsofrom GF; Linnell GJ; Filippi CG
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Aug; 193(2):527-32. PubMed ID: 19620452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. On-call musculoskeletal radiographs: discrepancy rates between radiology residents and musculoskeletal radiologists.
Kung JW; Melenevsky Y; Hochman MG; Didolkar MM; Yablon CM; Eisenberg RL; Wu JS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Apr; 200(4):856-9. PubMed ID: 23521460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Discrepancy rates of radiology resident interpretations of on-call neuroradiology MR imaging studies.
Filippi CG; Schneider B; Burbank HN; Alsofrom GF; Linnell G; Ratkovits B
Radiology; 2008 Dec; 249(3):972-9. PubMed ID: 19011191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The night stalker effect: quality improvements with a dedicated night-call rotation.
Mann FA; Danz PL
Invest Radiol; 1993 Jan; 28(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 8425860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of neuroradiology emergency MRI interpretations: low discrepancy rates between on-call radiology residents' preliminary interpretations and neuroradiologists' final reports.
Salca D; Lersy F; Willaume T; Stoessel M; Lefèvre A; Ardellier FD; Nicolaï C; Nouri A; Baloglu S; Bierry G; Chammas A; Kremer S
Eur Radiol; 2022 Oct; 32(10):7260-7269. PubMed ID: 35435441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Radiology resident interpretations of on-call imaging studies: the incidence of major discrepancies.
Cooper VF; Goodhartz LA; Nemcek AA; Ryu RK
Acad Radiol; 2008 Sep; 15(9):1198-204. PubMed ID: 18692761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Overnight shift work: factors contributing to diagnostic discrepancies.
Hanna TN; Loehfelm T; Khosa F; Rohatgi S; Johnson JO
Emerg Radiol; 2016 Feb; 23(1):41-47. PubMed ID: 26475281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of preliminary interpretation of neurologic CT examinations by on-call radiology residents and assessment of patient outcomes at a level I trauma center.
Miyakoshi A; Nguyen QT; Cohen WA; Talner LB; Anzai Y
J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Dec; 6(12):864-70. PubMed ID: 19945042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Special section--First year residents taking call: changing radiology resident call.
Rumack CM
J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Sep; 4(9):602-3. PubMed ID: 17845964
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Cross-sectional examination interpretation discrepancies between on-call diagnostic radiology residents and subspecialty faculty radiologists: analysis by imaging modality and subspecialty.
Ruma J; Klein KA; Chong S; Wesolowski J; Kazerooni EA; Ellis JH; Myles JD
J Am Coll Radiol; 2011 Jun; 8(6):409-14. PubMed ID: 21636055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
