266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17252270)
1. Field evaluation of the efficacy of proprietary repellent formulations with IR3535 and picaridin against Aedes aegypti.
Naucke TJ; Kröpke R; Benner G; Schulz J; Wittern KP; Rose A; Kröckel U; Grünewald HW
Parasitol Res; 2007 Jun; 101(1):169-77. PubMed ID: 17252270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative efficacy of IR3535 and deet as repellents against adult Aedes aegypti and Culex quinquefasciatus.
Cilek JE; Petersen JL; Hallmon CE
J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 2004 Sep; 20(3):299-304. PubMed ID: 15532931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Formulations of deet, picaridin, and IR3535 applied to skin repel nymphs of the lone star tick (Acari: Ixodidae) for 12 hours.
Carroll JF; Benante JP; Kramer M; Lohmeyer KH; Lawrence K
J Med Entomol; 2010 Jul; 47(4):699-704. PubMed ID: 20695288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Field evaluation of the efficacy and persistence of insect repellents DEET, IR3535, and KBR 3023 against Anopheles gambiae complex and other Afrotropical vector mosquitoes.
Costantini C; Badolo A; Ilboudo-Sanogo E
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg; 2004 Nov; 98(11):644-52. PubMed ID: 15363644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Lethal and behavioural effects of three synthetic repellents (DEET, IR3535 and KBR 3023) on Aedes aegypti mosquitoes in laboratory assays.
Licciardi S; Herve JP; Darriet F; Hougard JM; Corbel V
Med Vet Entomol; 2006 Sep; 20(3):288-93. PubMed ID: 17044879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Field evaluation of picaridin repellents reveals differences in repellent sensitivity between Southeast Asian vectors of malaria and arboviruses.
Van Roey K; Sokny M; Denis L; Van den Broeck N; Heng S; Siv S; Sluydts V; Sochantha T; Coosemans M; Durnez L
PLoS Negl Trop Dis; 2014 Dec; 8(12):e3326. PubMed ID: 25522134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Efficacy of Thai herbal essential oils as green repellent against mosquito vectors.
Soonwera M; Phasomkusolsil S
Acta Trop; 2015 Feb; 142():127-30. PubMed ID: 25438256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the sensitivity of Aedes aegypti and Anopheles gambiae complex mosquitoes to two insect repellents: DEET and KBR 3023.
Badolo A; Ilboudo-Sanogo E; Ouédraogo AP; Costantini C
Trop Med Int Health; 2004 Mar; 9(3):330-4. PubMed ID: 14996361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Single blinded semi-field evaluation of MAÏA
Mbuba E; Odufuwa OG; Tenywa FC; Philipo R; Tambwe MM; Swai JK; Moore JD; Moore SJ
Malar J; 2021 Jan; 20(1):12. PubMed ID: 33407496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Insecticidal, acaricidal and repellent effects of DEET- and IR3535-impregnated bed nets using a novel long-lasting polymer-coating technique.
Faulde MK; Albiez G; Nehring O
Parasitol Res; 2010 Mar; 106(4):957-65. PubMed ID: 20162432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A novel test cage with an air ventilation system as an alternative to conventional cages for the efficacy testing of mosquito repellents.
Obermayr U; Rose A; Geier M
J Med Entomol; 2010 Nov; 47(6):1116-22. PubMed ID: 21175061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of Sex Ratio and Density on the Comparative Repellency of IR3535
Nakayama SK; Graf R; Bohlmann AM; Zurlage J; Epstein H; Ranzani MRTC; Pflüecker F
J Cosmet Sci; 2019; 70(4):197-207. PubMed ID: 31441773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative field evaluation of repellent formulations containing deet and IR3535 against mosquitoes in Queensland, Australia.
Frances SP; MacKenzie DO; Rowcliffe KL; Corcoran SK
J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 2009 Dec; 25(4):511-3. PubMed ID: 20099600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The efficacy of repellents against Aedes, Anopheles, Culex and Ixodes spp. - a literature review.
Lupi E; Hatz C; Schlagenhauf P
Travel Med Infect Dis; 2013; 11(6):374-411. PubMed ID: 24201040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Field evaluations of topical arthropod repellents in North, Central, and South America.
Lawrence KL; Achee NL; Bernier UR; Mundal KD; Benante JP
J Med Entomol; 2014 Sep; 51(5):980-8. PubMed ID: 25276927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Repellent and deterrent effects of SS220, Picaridin, and Deet suppress human blood feeding by Aedes aegypti, Anopheles stephensi, and Phlebotomus papatasi.
Klun JA; Khrimian A; Debboun M
J Med Entomol; 2006 Jan; 43(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 16506445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Field evaluation of repellent formulations against daytime and nighttime biting mosquitoes in a tropical rainforest in northern Australia.
Frances SP; Van Dung N; Beebe NW; Debboun M
J Med Entomol; 2002 May; 39(3):541-4. PubMed ID: 12061453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Laboratory and field evaluations of the insect repellent 3535 (ethyl butylacetylaminopropionate) and deet against mosquito vectors in Thailand.
Thavara U; Tawatsin A; Chompoosri J; Suwonkerd W; Chansang UR; Asavadachanukorn P
J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 2001 Sep; 17(3):190-5. PubMed ID: 14529087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. EPA-Registered Repellents for Mosquitoes Transmitting Emerging Viral Disease.
Patel RV; Shaeer KM; Patel P; Garmaza A; Wiangkham K; Franks RB; Pane O; Carris NW
Pharmacotherapy; 2016 Dec; 36(12):1272-1280. PubMed ID: 27779781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Field evaluation against mosquitoes of regular and polymer-based deet formulations in Manitoba, Canada, with comment on methodological issues.
Schofield S; Tepper M; Gadawski R
J Med Entomol; 2007 May; 44(3):457-62. PubMed ID: 17547231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
