155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17252603)
1. Laparoscopic versus open colposuspension for urodynamic stress incontinence.
Tan E; Tekkis PP; Cornish J; Teoh TG; Darzi AW; Khullar V
Neurourol Urodyn; 2007; 26(2):158-69. PubMed ID: 17252603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Open retropubic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women: a short version Cochrane review.
Lapitan MC; Cody JD; Grant A
Neurourol Urodyn; 2009; 28(6):472-80. PubMed ID: 19591206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Laparoscopic versus open Burch colposuspension: a randomised controlled trial.
Carey MP; Goh JT; Rosamilia A; Cornish A; Gordon I; Hawthorne G; Maher CF; Dwyer PL; Moran P; Gilmour DT
BJOG; 2006 Sep; 113(9):999-1006. PubMed ID: 16956331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laparoscopic versus open colposuspension: which one should we choose?
Reid F; Smith AR
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Aug; 19(4):345-9. PubMed ID: 17625416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Effects of laparoscopic Burch colposuspension and tension-free vaginal tape in treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: a comparative study].
Tong JL; Zhu L; Lang JH
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Dec; 88(45):3192-4. PubMed ID: 19171091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.
Aziz O; Constantinides V; Tekkis PP; Athanasiou T; Purkayastha S; Paraskeva P; Darzi AW; Heriot AG
Ann Surg Oncol; 2006 Mar; 13(3):413-24. PubMed ID: 16450220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Laparoscopic versus open colposuspension--results of a prospective randomised controlled trial.
Kitchener HC; Dunn G; Lawton V; Reid F; Nelson L; Smith AR;
BJOG; 2006 Sep; 113(9):1007-13. PubMed ID: 16956332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A randomised trial comparing open Burch colposuspension using sutures with laparoscopic colposuspension using mesh and staples in women with stress urinary incontinence.
Ankardal M; Ekerydh A; Crafoord K; Milsom I; Stjerndahl JH; Engh ME
BJOG; 2004 Sep; 111(9):974-81. PubMed ID: 15327613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness analysis of open colposuspension versus laparoscopic colposuspension in the treatment of urodynamic stress incontinence.
Dumville JC; Manca A; Kitchener HC; Smith AR; Nelson L; Torgerson DJ;
BJOG; 2006 Sep; 113(9):1014-22. PubMed ID: 16956333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension.
Jenkins TR; Liu CY
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Aug; 19(4):314-8. PubMed ID: 17625411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A cost-effectiveness analysis of tension-free vaginal tape versus laparoscopic mesh colposuspension for primary female stress incontinence.
Valpas A; Rissanen P; Kujansuu E; Nilsson CG
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(12):1485-90. PubMed ID: 17260226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Five years follow up of laparoscopic burch colposuspension for stress urinary incontinence in Thai women.
Bunyavejchevin S; Wisawasukmongchol W
J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Sep; 88(9):1182-6. PubMed ID: 16536102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative outcome analysis of laparoscopic colposuspension, abdominal colposuspension and vaginal needle suspension for female urinary incontinence.
Das S
J Urol; 1998 Aug; 160(2):368-71. PubMed ID: 9679879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of laparoscopic and open retropubic urethropexy for treatment of stress urinary incontinence.
Polascik TJ; Moore RG; Rosenberg MT; Kavoussi LR
Urology; 1995 Apr; 45(4):647-52. PubMed ID: 7716846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Laparoscopic transperitoneal colposuspension modo Burch in stress incontinence in women. A comparison of early and late results].
Huk J; Fryczkowski M
Przegl Lek; 2002; 59(2):91-4. PubMed ID: 12152257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Laparoscopic burch colposuspension: comparison of effectiveness of extraperitoneal and transperitoneal techniques.
Bulent Tiras M; Sendag F; Dilek U; Guner H
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2004 Sep; 116(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 15294373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Laparoscopic vs. open surgery for diverticular disease: a meta-analysis of nonrandomized studies.
Purkayastha S; Constantinides VA; Tekkis PP; Athanasiou T; Aziz O; Tilney H; Darzi AW; Heriot AG
Dis Colon Rectum; 2006 Apr; 49(4):446-63. PubMed ID: 16534656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing open and laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery.
Peters MJ; Mukhtar A; Yunus RM; Khan S; Pappalardo J; Memon B; Memon MA
Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Jun; 104(6):1548-61; quiz 1547, 1562. PubMed ID: 19491872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Comparison of laparoscopic and laparotomy colposuspension in the treatment of urinary stress incontinence. Comparative study of 72 matched cases].
Miannay E; Cosson M; Querleu D; Crépin G
Contracept Fertil Sex; 1998 May; 26(5):376-85. PubMed ID: 9648382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Laparoscopic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women.
Dean NM; Ellis G; Wilson PD; Herbison GP
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2006 Jul; (3):CD002239. PubMed ID: 16855989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
