These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17252603)

  • 1. Laparoscopic versus open colposuspension for urodynamic stress incontinence.
    Tan E; Tekkis PP; Cornish J; Teoh TG; Darzi AW; Khullar V
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2007; 26(2):158-69. PubMed ID: 17252603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Open retropubic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women: a short version Cochrane review.
    Lapitan MC; Cody JD; Grant A
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2009; 28(6):472-80. PubMed ID: 19591206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Laparoscopic versus open Burch colposuspension: a randomised controlled trial.
    Carey MP; Goh JT; Rosamilia A; Cornish A; Gordon I; Hawthorne G; Maher CF; Dwyer PL; Moran P; Gilmour DT
    BJOG; 2006 Sep; 113(9):999-1006. PubMed ID: 16956331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Laparoscopic versus open colposuspension: which one should we choose?
    Reid F; Smith AR
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Aug; 19(4):345-9. PubMed ID: 17625416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Effects of laparoscopic Burch colposuspension and tension-free vaginal tape in treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: a comparative study].
    Tong JL; Zhu L; Lang JH
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Dec; 88(45):3192-4. PubMed ID: 19171091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.
    Aziz O; Constantinides V; Tekkis PP; Athanasiou T; Purkayastha S; Paraskeva P; Darzi AW; Heriot AG
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2006 Mar; 13(3):413-24. PubMed ID: 16450220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Laparoscopic versus open colposuspension--results of a prospective randomised controlled trial.
    Kitchener HC; Dunn G; Lawton V; Reid F; Nelson L; Smith AR;
    BJOG; 2006 Sep; 113(9):1007-13. PubMed ID: 16956332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A randomised trial comparing open Burch colposuspension using sutures with laparoscopic colposuspension using mesh and staples in women with stress urinary incontinence.
    Ankardal M; Ekerydh A; Crafoord K; Milsom I; Stjerndahl JH; Engh ME
    BJOG; 2004 Sep; 111(9):974-81. PubMed ID: 15327613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost-effectiveness analysis of open colposuspension versus laparoscopic colposuspension in the treatment of urodynamic stress incontinence.
    Dumville JC; Manca A; Kitchener HC; Smith AR; Nelson L; Torgerson DJ;
    BJOG; 2006 Sep; 113(9):1014-22. PubMed ID: 16956333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension.
    Jenkins TR; Liu CY
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Aug; 19(4):314-8. PubMed ID: 17625411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A cost-effectiveness analysis of tension-free vaginal tape versus laparoscopic mesh colposuspension for primary female stress incontinence.
    Valpas A; Rissanen P; Kujansuu E; Nilsson CG
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(12):1485-90. PubMed ID: 17260226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Five years follow up of laparoscopic burch colposuspension for stress urinary incontinence in Thai women.
    Bunyavejchevin S; Wisawasukmongchol W
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Sep; 88(9):1182-6. PubMed ID: 16536102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative outcome analysis of laparoscopic colposuspension, abdominal colposuspension and vaginal needle suspension for female urinary incontinence.
    Das S
    J Urol; 1998 Aug; 160(2):368-71. PubMed ID: 9679879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of laparoscopic and open retropubic urethropexy for treatment of stress urinary incontinence.
    Polascik TJ; Moore RG; Rosenberg MT; Kavoussi LR
    Urology; 1995 Apr; 45(4):647-52. PubMed ID: 7716846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Laparoscopic transperitoneal colposuspension modo Burch in stress incontinence in women. A comparison of early and late results].
    Huk J; Fryczkowski M
    Przegl Lek; 2002; 59(2):91-4. PubMed ID: 12152257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laparoscopic burch colposuspension: comparison of effectiveness of extraperitoneal and transperitoneal techniques.
    Bulent Tiras M; Sendag F; Dilek U; Guner H
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2004 Sep; 116(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 15294373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laparoscopic vs. open surgery for diverticular disease: a meta-analysis of nonrandomized studies.
    Purkayastha S; Constantinides VA; Tekkis PP; Athanasiou T; Aziz O; Tilney H; Darzi AW; Heriot AG
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2006 Apr; 49(4):446-63. PubMed ID: 16534656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing open and laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery.
    Peters MJ; Mukhtar A; Yunus RM; Khan S; Pappalardo J; Memon B; Memon MA
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Jun; 104(6):1548-61; quiz 1547, 1562. PubMed ID: 19491872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Comparison of laparoscopic and laparotomy colposuspension in the treatment of urinary stress incontinence. Comparative study of 72 matched cases].
    Miannay E; Cosson M; Querleu D; Crépin G
    Contracept Fertil Sex; 1998 May; 26(5):376-85. PubMed ID: 9648382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Laparoscopic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women.
    Dean NM; Ellis G; Wilson PD; Herbison GP
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2006 Jul; (3):CD002239. PubMed ID: 16855989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.