130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17252705)
1. [Incidence of pelvic lymph node metastasis in radical prostatectomy].
Jeremić N; Cerović S; Brajusković G; Tomović S; Maletić-Vuković V
Vojnosanit Pregl; 2006 Dec; 63(12):1011-4. PubMed ID: 17252705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Extended pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy: high incidence of lymph node metastasis.
Heidenreich A; Varga Z; Von Knobloch R
J Urol; 2002 Apr; 167(4):1681-6. PubMed ID: 11912387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Utility of preoperative serum prostate-specific antigen concentration and biopsy Gleason score in predicting risk of pelvic lymph node metastases in prostate cancer.
Narayan P; Fournier G; Gajendran V; Leidich R; Lo R; Wolf JS; Jacob G; Nicolaisen G; Palmer K; Freiha F
Urology; 1994 Oct; 44(4):519-24. PubMed ID: 7524237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability of preoperative values to determine the need for lymphadenectomy in patients with prostate cancer and meticulous lymph node dissection.
Burkhard FC; Bader P; Schneider E; Markwalder R; Studer UE
Eur Urol; 2002 Aug; 42(2):84-90; discussion 90-2. PubMed ID: 12160577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Outcome after radical prostatectomy with extended pelvic lymphadenectomy for untreated high-risk clinically localized prostate cancer].
Tsurusaki T; Yamasaki Y; Maruta S
Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi; 2013 May; 104(3):496-504. PubMed ID: 23819361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A preoperative nomogram identifying decreased risk of positive pelvic lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer.
Cagiannos I; Karakiewicz P; Eastham JA; Ohori M; Rabbani F; Gerigk C; Reuter V; Graefen M; Hammerer PG; Erbersdobler A; Huland H; Kupelian P; Klein E; Quinn DI; Henshall SM; Grygiel JJ; Sutherland RL; Stricker PD; Morash CG; Scardino PT; Kattan MW
J Urol; 2003 Nov; 170(5):1798-803. PubMed ID: 14532779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Incidence of positive pelvic lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer, a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of < or =10 ng/mL and biopsy Gleason score of < or =6, and their influence on PSA progression-free survival after radical prostatectomy.
Weckermann D; Goppelt M; Dorn R; Wawroschek F; Harzmann R
BJU Int; 2006 Jun; 97(6):1173-8. PubMed ID: 16686707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Indications for pelvic lymphadenectomy in clinically localized prostate cancer].
Peneau M; Villers A; Molinié V; Theis D; Soulié M
Prog Urol; 2004 Jun; 14(3):287-94. PubMed ID: 15373168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Re-evaluation of the need for pelvic lymphadenectomy in low grade prostate cancer.
Fournier GR; Narayan P
Br J Urol; 1993 Oct; 72(4):484-8. PubMed ID: 7505192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of preoperative plasma endoglin for prediction of lymph node metastasis in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer.
Karam JA; Svatek RS; Karakiewicz PI; Gallina A; Roehrborn CG; Slawin KM; Shariat SF
Clin Cancer Res; 2008 Mar; 14(5):1418-22. PubMed ID: 18316564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improved sensitivity for detecting micrometastases in pelvic lymph nodes by real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) compared with conventional RT-PCR in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy.
Terakawa T; Miyake H; Kurahashi T; Furukawa J; Takenaka A; Fujisawa M
BJU Int; 2009 Apr; 103(8):1074-8. PubMed ID: 19348036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is pelvic lymph node dissection necessary in patients with a serum PSA<10ng/ml undergoing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer?
Schumacher MC; Burkhard FC; Thalmann GN; Fleischmann A; Studer UE
Eur Urol; 2006 Aug; 50(2):272-9. PubMed ID: 16632187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Nondissection of pelvic lymph nodes does not influence the results of perineal radical prostatectomy in selected patients.
Salomon L; Hoznek A; Lefrère-Belda MA; Bellot J; Chopin DK; Abbou CC
Eur Urol; 2000 Mar; 37(3):297-300. PubMed ID: 10720855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detecting lymph nodes metastasis in prostate cancer through extended vs. standard laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy.
Arenas LF; Füllhase C; Boemans P; Fichtner J
Aktuelle Urol; 2010 Jan; 41 Suppl 1():S10-4. PubMed ID: 20094944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The incidence of lymph node metastases in prostate carcinoma depends not only on tumor characteristics but also on surgical performance and extent of pelvic lymphadenectomy.
Klevecka V; Musch M; Roggenbuck U; Stoerkel S; Kroepfl D
Medicina (Kaunas); 2008; 44(8):601-8. PubMed ID: 18791337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Incidence of locally invasive prostate cancer in patients with intermediate values of prostate-specific antigen].
Cerović S; Jeremić N; Brajusković G; Milović N; Maletić-Vukotić V
Vojnosanit Pregl; 2007 Aug; 64(8):531-7. PubMed ID: 17874720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. External validation of the updated nomogram predicting lymph node invasion in patients with prostate cancer undergoing extended pelvic lymph node dissection.
Gacci M; Schiavina R; Lanciotti M; Masieri L; Serni S; Vagnoni V; Abdollah F; Carini M; Martorana G; Montorsi F
Urol Int; 2013; 90(3):277-82. PubMed ID: 23296120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radical prostatectomy represents an effective treatment in patients with specimen-confined high pathological Gleason score prostate cancer.
Lughezzani G; Gallina A; Larcher A; Briganti A; Capitanio U; Suardi N; Lista G; Abrate A; Sangalli MN; Buffi N; Cestari A; Guazzoni G; Rigatti P; Montorsi F
BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(5):723-30. PubMed ID: 22487441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laparoscopic extended pelvic lymph node dissection for high-risk prostate cancer.
Wyler SF; Sulser T; Seifert HH; Ruszat R; Forster TH; Gasser TC; Bachmann A
Urology; 2006 Oct; 68(4):883-7. PubMed ID: 17070376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Outcomes after radical prostatectomy for patients with clinical stages T1-T2 prostate cancer with pathologically positive lymph nodes in the prostate-specific antigen era.
Dorin RP; Lieskovsky G; Fairey AS; Cai J; Daneshmand S
Urol Oncol; 2013 Nov; 31(8):1441-7. PubMed ID: 22516714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
