416 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17253576)
21. Comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy in the treatment of ureteral calculi: a prospective study.
Strohmaier WL; Schubert G; Rosenkranz T; Weigl A
Eur Urol; 1999 Nov; 36(5):376-9. PubMed ID: 10516445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Treatment of proximal ureteral calculi: holmium:YAG laser ureterolithotripsy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
Lam JS; Greene TD; Gupta M
J Urol; 2002 May; 167(5):1972-6. PubMed ID: 11956420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison between extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy for treating large proximal ureteral stones: a meta-analysis.
Cui X; Ji F; Yan H; Ou TW; Jia CS; He XZ; Gao W; Wang Q; Cui B; Wu JT
Urology; 2015 Apr; 85(4):748-56. PubMed ID: 25681251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Ureteroscopic treatment of ureteral stones: only an auxiliary measure of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy or a primary therapeutic option?
Osti AH; Hofmockel G; Frohmüller H
Urol Int; 1997; 59(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 9428436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Influence of lithotripsy modalities on complication rate].
Radulović S; Milenković-Petronić D; Vuksanović A; Vavić B
Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2009; 137(5-6):259-65. PubMed ID: 19594067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of ESWL and ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy in management of ureteral stones.
Cui Y; Cao W; Shen H; Xie J; Adams TS; Zhang Y; Shao Q
PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e87634. PubMed ID: 24498344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Meta-analysis of Optimal Management of Lower Pole Stone of 10 - 20 mm: Flexible Ureteroscopy (FURS) versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) versus Percutaneus Nephrolithotomy (PCNL).
Yuri P; Hariwibowo R; Soeroharjo I; Danarto R; Hendri AZ; Brodjonegoro SR; Rasyid N; Birowo P; Widyahening IS
Acta Med Indones; 2018 Jan; 50(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 29686172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Compare the outcome of ureteroscopic lithotripsy with ureteroscopic management after failed extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral calculi].
Wang DW; Wang JY; Cao XM
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Feb; 47(4):258-60. PubMed ID: 19570385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A meta-analysis of the efficacy of ureteroscopic lithotripsy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy on ureteral calculi.
Xu Y; Lu Y; Li J; Luo S; Liu Y; Jia Z; Chen P; Guo Y; Zhao Q; Ma X; Jia S
Acta Cir Bras; 2014 May; 29(5):346-52. PubMed ID: 24863324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Treatment of lower urethral calculi with extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy and pneumatic ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a comparison of effectiveness and complications.
Zhong W; Zeng G; Cai Y; Dai Q; Hu J; Wei H
Chin Med J (Engl); 2003 Jul; 116(7):1001-3. PubMed ID: 12890371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. TREATMENT OF DISTAL URETERIC STONES-COMPARATIVE EFFICACY OF TRANSURETERAL PNEUMATIC LITHOTRIPSY AND EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK WAVE LITHOTRIPSY.
Wazir BG; Orakzai AN; Nawaz A
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2015; 27(1):140-2. PubMed ID: 26182760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for treatment of proximal ureteric calculi: a cost-effectiveness study.
Izamin I; Aniza I; Rizal AM; Aljunid SM
Med J Malaysia; 2009 Mar; 64(1):12-21. PubMed ID: 19852314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Management of Proximal Ureteric Stones: Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) Versus Ureterorenoscopic Lithotripsy (URSL).
Joshi HN; Shrestha B; Karmacharya RM; Makaju S; Koju R; Gyawali D
Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ); 2017 Oct.-Dec.; 15(60):343-346. PubMed ID: 30580354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Cost-effectiveness of treating ureteral stones in a Taipei City Hospital: shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy plus lithoclast.
Huang CY; Chen SS; Chen LK
Urol Int; 2009; 83(4):410-5. PubMed ID: 19996647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Treatment of ureteral stones: comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and endourologic alternatives.
Küpeli B; Biri H; Isen K; Onaran M; Alkibay T; Karaoğlan U; Bozkirli I
Eur Urol; 1998 Dec; 34(6):474-9. PubMed ID: 9831788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Outcomes of Flexible Ureteroscopy vs Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Renal Stones in Pediatric Patients: A European Association of Urology Urolithiasis Guidelines Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Geraghty R; Lombardo R; Yuan C; Davis N; Tzelves L; Petrik A; Jung H; Gambaro G; Tailly T; Neisius A; Skolarikos A; Somani B
J Urol; 2023 Dec; 210(6):876-887. PubMed ID: 37669621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Efficiency and cost of treating proximal ureteral stones: shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy plus holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser.
Parker BD; Frederick RW; Reilly TP; Lowry PS; Bird ET
Urology; 2004 Dec; 64(6):1102-6; discussion 1106. PubMed ID: 15596177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Ureteroscopic treatment of ureteric lithiasis. Analysis of 354 urs procedures in a community hospital.
du Fossé W; Billiet I; Mattelaer J
Acta Urol Belg; 1998 Oct; 66(3):33-40. PubMed ID: 9864877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Distal ureteral lithiasis. ESWL versus ambulatory URS].
Miján Ortiz JL; Gutiérrez Tejero F; López Carmona F; Nogueras Ocaña M; Arrabal Martín M; Zuluaga Gómez A
Arch Esp Urol; 2001 Nov; 54(9):983-7. PubMed ID: 11789375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A comparison of ureteroscopy to in situ extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for the treatment of distal ureteral calculi.
Turk TM; Jenkins AD
J Urol; 1999 Jan; 161(1):45-6; discussion 46-7. PubMed ID: 10037364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
