These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17256230)

  • 1. The constitutional right to therapeutic cloning.
    Bellinger M
    J Med Law; 2002; 7(1):37-53. PubMed ID: 17256230
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does the Thirteenth Amendment provide a jurisdictional basis for a federal ban on cloning?
    Vinck SC
    J Legis; 2003; 30(1):183-91. PubMed ID: 17256218
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Supreme Court, the "facts of life" and "the thoughtful part of the nation.
    Destro RA
    Hum Life Rev; 1994; 20(3):28-48. PubMed ID: 11656359
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey: the reaffirmation of Roe or the beginning of the end?
    Henry KS
    Univ Louisv J Fam Law; 1993-1994 Winter; 32(1):93-113. PubMed ID: 11660011
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Respecting human life in 21st century America: a moral perspective to extend civil rights to the unborn from creation to natural death.
    Lugosi CI
    Issues Law Med; 2005; 20(3):211-58. PubMed ID: 15916258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Abortion and a nation at war.
    First Things; 1992 Oct; 26():9-13. PubMed ID: 11659506
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How rights are infringed: the role of undue burden analysis in constitutional doctrine.
    Brownstein A
    Hastings Law J; 1994 Apr; 45(4):867-959. PubMed ID: 11656422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Infanticide or civil rights for women: did the Supreme Court go too far in Stenberg v. Carhart?
    Schmutz SD
    Houst Law Rev; 2002; 39(2):529-66. PubMed ID: 15212035
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Emancipation as freedom in Roe v. Wade.
    Bezanson RP
    Dickinson Law Rev; 1993; 97(3):485-512. PubMed ID: 11656343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Abortion law today.
    Field MA
    J Leg Med; 1993 Mar; 14(1):3-24. PubMed ID: 8463750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the current state of abortion law.
    Berlin SI
    Second Opin; 1993 Jan; 18(3):104-9. PubMed ID: 11645221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the flight from reason in the Supreme Court.
    Linton PB
    St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1993; 13(1):15-137. PubMed ID: 11656611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the death of repose in reproductive decisionmaking.
    Nivala J
    Const Law J; 1993; 4(1):47-95. PubMed ID: 12083095
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. High Court, 5-4, affirms right to abortion but allows most of Pennsylvania's limits.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 1992 Jun; ():A1, A15-17. PubMed ID: 11647923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Health law.
    Gostin LO
    JAMA; 1992 Jul; 268(3):364-6. PubMed ID: 1535384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Human cloning and the Constitution.
    Forsythe CD
    Valparaiso Univ Law Rev; 1998; 32(2):469-542. PubMed ID: 12710444
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis.
    Peterfy A
    J Leg Med; 1995 Dec; 16(4):607-36. PubMed ID: 8568420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Consti-tortion: tort law as an end-run around abortion rights after Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
    Stone AJ
    Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2000; 8(2):471-515. PubMed ID: 16594110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Abortion compromise -- inevitable and impossible.
    Law SA
    Univ Ill Law Rev; 1992; 25(4):921-41. PubMed ID: 11656296
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Abortion: rights or technicalities? A comparison of Roe v. Wade with the abortion decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court.
    Brown HO
    Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(3):60-74. PubMed ID: 11662181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.