147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17257426)
1. Detecting differential expression in microarray data: comparison of optimal procedures.
Perelman E; Ploner A; Calza S; Pawitan Y
BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Jan; 8():28. PubMed ID: 17257426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multidimensional local false discovery rate for microarray studies.
Ploner A; Calza S; Gusnanto A; Pawitan Y
Bioinformatics; 2006 Mar; 22(5):556-65. PubMed ID: 16368770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A computationally efficient modular optimal discovery procedure.
Woo S; Leek JT; Storey JD
Bioinformatics; 2011 Feb; 27(4):509-15. PubMed ID: 21186247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A note on using permutation-based false discovery rate estimates to compare different analysis methods for microarray data.
Xie Y; Pan W; Khodursky AB
Bioinformatics; 2005 Dec; 21(23):4280-8. PubMed ID: 16188930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Construction of null statistics in permutation-based multiple testing for multi-factorial microarray experiments.
Gao X
Bioinformatics; 2006 Jun; 22(12):1486-94. PubMed ID: 16574697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of seven methods for producing Affymetrix expression scores based on False Discovery Rates in disease profiling data.
Shedden K; Chen W; Kuick R; Ghosh D; Macdonald J; Cho KR; Giordano TJ; Gruber SB; Fearon ER; Taylor JM; Hanash S
BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Feb; 6():26. PubMed ID: 15705192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Work efficiency: a new criterion for comprehensive comparison and evaluation of statistical methods in large-scale identification of differentially expressed genes.
Tan YD
Genomics; 2011 Nov; 98(5):390-9. PubMed ID: 21741470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Modified nonparametric approaches to detecting differentially expressed genes in replicated microarray experiments.
Zhao Y; Pan W
Bioinformatics; 2003 Jun; 19(9):1046-54. PubMed ID: 12801864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Identifying differentially expressed genes using false discovery rate controlling procedures.
Reiner A; Yekutieli D; Benjamini Y
Bioinformatics; 2003 Feb; 19(3):368-75. PubMed ID: 12584122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bias in the estimation of false discovery rate in microarray studies.
Pawitan Y; Murthy KR; Michiels S; Ploner A
Bioinformatics; 2005 Oct; 21(20):3865-72. PubMed ID: 16105901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A unified framework for finding differentially expressed genes from microarray experiments.
Shaik JS; Yeasin M
BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Sep; 8():347. PubMed ID: 17877806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bayesian optimal discovery procedure for simultaneous significance testing.
Cao J; Xie XJ; Zhang S; Whitehurst A; White MA
BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Jan; 10():5. PubMed ID: 19126217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The optimal discovery procedure for large-scale significance testing, with applications to comparative microarray experiments.
Storey JD; Dai JY; Leek JT
Biostatistics; 2007 Apr; 8(2):414-32. PubMed ID: 16928955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Estimation of false discovery proportion under general dependence.
Pawitan Y; Calza S; Ploner A
Bioinformatics; 2006 Dec; 22(24):3025-31. PubMed ID: 17046978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How accurately can we control the FDR in analyzing microarray data?
Jung SH; Jang W
Bioinformatics; 2006 Jul; 22(14):1730-6. PubMed ID: 16644791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Using weighted permutation scores to detect differential gene expression with microarray data.
Guo X; Pan W
J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2005 Aug; 3(4):989-1006. PubMed ID: 16078371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Estimating the false discovery rate using nonparametric deconvolution.
van de Wiel MA; Kim KI
Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):806-15. PubMed ID: 17825012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of small n statistical tests of differential expression applied to microarrays.
Murie C; Woody O; Lee AY; Nadon R
BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Feb; 10():45. PubMed ID: 19192265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. False discovery rate, sensitivity and sample size for microarray studies.
Pawitan Y; Michiels S; Koscielny S; Gusnanto A; Ploner A
Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 21(13):3017-24. PubMed ID: 15840707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reproducibility-optimized test statistic for ranking genes in microarray studies.
Elo LL; Filen S; Lahesmaa R; Aittokallio T
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2008; 5(3):423-431. PubMed ID: 18670045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
