230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17257719)
1. Changes in femur stress after hip resurfacing arthroplasty: response to physiological loads.
Little JP; Taddei F; Viceconti M; Murray DW; Gill HS
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 May; 22(4):440-8. PubMed ID: 17257719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Role of loads and prosthesis material properties on the mechanics of the proximal femur after total hip arthroplasty.
Cheal EJ; Spector M; Hayes WC
J Orthop Res; 1992 May; 10(3):405-22. PubMed ID: 1569504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Finite element modeling of resurfacing hip prosthesis: estimation of accuracy through experimental validation.
Taddei F; Martelli S; Gill HS; Cristofolini L; Viceconti M
J Biomech Eng; 2010 Feb; 132(2):021002. PubMed ID: 20370239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanics of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
Ong KL; Kurtz SM; Manley MT; Rushton N; Mohammed NA; Field RE
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Aug; 88(8):1110-5. PubMed ID: 16877617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bone remodelling inside a cemented resurfaced femoral head.
Gupta S; New AM; Taylor M
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Jul; 21(6):594-602. PubMed ID: 16542761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Less range of motion with resurfacing arthroplasty than with total hip arthroplasty: in vitro examination of 8 designs.
Bengs BC; Sangiorgio SN; Ebramzadeh E
Acta Orthop; 2008 Dec; 79(6):755-62. PubMed ID: 19085491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Surgical variables affect the mechanics of a hip resurfacing system.
Long JP; Bartel DL
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 Dec; 453():115-22. PubMed ID: 17016222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of changes in stem positioning on femoral loading after THR using a short-stemmed hip implant.
Speirs AD; Heller MO; Taylor WR; Duda GN; Perka C
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 May; 22(4):431-9. PubMed ID: 17275151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Finite element analysis of changes in femoral stresses after elite total hip arthroplasty].
He RX; Luo YM; Yan SG; Wu HB
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Sep; 84(18):1549-53. PubMed ID: 15500718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of femoral neck fracture risk for a novel proximal epiphyseal hip prosthesis.
Cristofolini L; Juszczyk M; Taddei F; Field RE; Rushton N; Viceconti M
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2011 Jul; 26(6):585-91. PubMed ID: 21334123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Alterations in femoral strain following hip resurfacing and total hip replacement.
Deuel CR; Jamali AA; Stover SM; Hazelwood SJ
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 Jan; 91(1):124-30. PubMed ID: 19092017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Investigation into the effect of varus-valgus orientation on load transfer in the resurfaced femoral head: a multi-femur finite element analysis.
Radcliffe IA; Taylor M
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Aug; 22(7):780-6. PubMed ID: 17544555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Proximal femoral bone mineral density after resurfacing total hip arthroplasty and after standard stem-type cementless total hip arthroplasty, both having similar neck preservation and the same articulation type.
Hayaishi Y; Miki H; Nishii T; Hananouchi T; Yoshikawa H; Sugano N
J Arthroplasty; 2007 Dec; 22(8):1208-13. PubMed ID: 18078893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Theoretical analysis of changes in femoral stresses after total hip arthroplasty].
Yan S; Wu H; Yu S
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Jun; 23(3):530-4. PubMed ID: 16856384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Changes of the bone mineral density of proximal femur after hip resurfacing arthroplasty].
Lian YY; Yoo MC; Pei FX; Cheng JQ; Feng W; Cho YJ; Kim GI; Chun SW
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Aug; 45(16):1091-4. PubMed ID: 18005605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Gait analysis of patients with resurfacing hip arthroplasty compared with hip osteoarthritis and standard total hip arthroplasty.
Mont MA; Seyler TM; Ragland PS; Starr R; Erhart J; Bhave A
J Arthroplasty; 2007 Jan; 22(1):100-8. PubMed ID: 17197316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Femoral component positioning in resurfacing arthroplasty--effects on cortical strains.
Kummer FJ; Pereira G; Schachter AK; Jaffe WL
Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2009; 67(4):341-6. PubMed ID: 20001936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Limited range of motion of hip resurfacing arthroplasty due to unfavorable ratio of prosthetic head size and femoral neck diameter.
Kluess D; Zietz C; Lindner T; Mittelmeier W; Schmitz KP; Bader R
Acta Orthop; 2008 Dec; 79(6):748-54. PubMed ID: 19085490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effects of total hip arthroplasty on the structural and biomechanical properties of adult bone.
Peck JJ; Stout SD
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2009 Feb; 138(2):221-30. PubMed ID: 18773467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The biomechanical consequence of insufficient femoral component lateralization and exposed cancellous bone in hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
Olsen M; Davis ET; Whyne CM; Zdero R; Schemitsch EH
J Biomech Eng; 2010 Aug; 132(8):081011. PubMed ID: 20670060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
